Page 12 - WALS Journal
P. 12

Vijaykumar Rajaram Naik

            Laparoscopy in HIV Positive Patients with Acute    Role of Laparoscopy in Gynecological Emergencies
            Abdomen
                                                               Laparoscopy is useful in the early recognition of pelvic
            •  Correct diagnosis achieved with least surgical trauma.  inflammatory disease and Fitz Hughes Curtis syndrome
            •  Institution of timely and effective treatment.  (Perihepatitis associated with PID). It is also useful in the early
            •  Reduction of risks of transmission of virus to theater  recognition of pelvic inflammatory disease and Fitz Hughes
               personnel’s due to small incision and less contact with  Curtis syndrome (Perihepatitis associated with PID).
               patient’s body fluids.
                                                               Role of Laparoscopy in Suspected Acute Appendicitis
               Diagnostic laparoscopy minimizes unnecessary laparotomies
            and complications.                                 Commonest abdominal emergency all round the world is acute
                                                               appendicitis. An early diagnostic laparoscopy in suspected
            Laparoscopy in Trauma Patients (Blunt and          acute appendicitis reduces the risk of appendiceal perforation,
            Penetrating)                                       improves diagnostic accuracy and reduces the number of
                                                               negative laparotomies. It helps the surgeon to rule out
            Trauma patients with equivocal signs are always a dilemma,  concomitant problems but two important groups of patients
            more so when patients are victims of “Urban violence, car  where it is immensely useful in:
            accidents, intoxication by alcohol, spinal cord injury and/or
            head injury. Commonly used diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL)  •  Premenopausal women when it is difficult to rule out
            has a sensitivity of > 95% and specificity of 83%. The rate of  •  gynecological conditions.
                                                                  Obese patients in whom large incisions may be required to
            unnecessary laparotomy is still very high with a morbidity of  remove the appendix.
            20% and mortality of 6%. If diagnostic laparoscopy is combined
            with diagnostic peritoneal lavage then the sensitivity can be  Laparoscopy in Patients with Perforated Peptic
            increased up to 100% and specificity up to 90%. Diagnostic  Ulcers
            laparoscopy is extremely useful in patients with equivocal signs
            and hemodynamically stable. It is slowly replacing the old belief  Early diagnosis and treatment of perforated peptic ulcer within 6
            that, all penetrating abdominal wounds whether stab or gunshot  hours of the incident can reduce mortality from 90% to about
            should be explored. Also in cases of subcapsular tears of liver  10%. Diagnostic laparoscopy is much more sensitive than CT as
            or spleen or minor tears in mesentery or omental injury can now  it can determine the type of fluid along with food debris and can
            be completely conserved saving the number of non-therapeutic  accurately localize the site of perforation. Perforations are closed
            laparotomies (NTL).                                by simple suture, omental patch, fibrinous glue, falciform ligament
                                                               patch or ligamentum teres patch. The trend is towards suture
                                                               less closure or ligamentous patches. A larger delay, beyond 6
            Laparoscopy in ICU Patients/Critically Ill
                                                               hours, makes closure difficult and hazardous due to inflammatory
            •  Acalculus/Calculus cholecystitis.               changes and phlegmon. Main disadvantage is increased
            •  Large bowel perforation.                        operating time and recent studies have not shown to decrease
            •  Duodenal and gastric perforations (e.g. stress ulcers)  length of hospital stay, resumption of normal diet, reduction of
            •  Duodenal and gastric perforations (e.g. stress ulcers)  pain in the first 24 hours, or early return to normal activities.
            •  Pancreatitis (due to biliary sludge)            Prospective random trials are needed to clarify these factors.
            •  Intra-abdominal hemorrhage.
                                                               Laparoscopy and Small Bowel Obstruction (SBO)
               It is extremely difficult to diagnose above mentioned
            complications in a patient who is already in MOF (multiple organ  Early SBO, with minimal peritonitis, single band adhesions,
            failure). There are no symptoms and signs which can be elucidated  without obvious gangrenous changes in the bowel can be
            as patients are on ventilation or gravely ill and delay in surgical  managed by therapeutic laparoscopy.
            treatment may lead to increase in morbidity and mortality.  The other criteria for selection are:
                                                               •  Proximal obstruction.
            Laparoscopy in Chronic Abdomen in HIV Patients     •  A partial obstruction.
                                                               •  Obstruction partially responding to nasogastric suction.
            Most of patients presenting with chronic abdominal pain after
            laparotomy found to have mesenteric lamphadenopathy, or drug  Laparoscopy and Diverticular Disease
            induced pancreatitis, here diagnostic laparoscopy can take
            mesenteric lymph node biopsy without much major surgical  Diagnostic laparoscopy is very useful in diagnosing severity
            trauma.                                            of diverticular disease so that management decision can be

                                                             10
   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17