Page 11 - WALS Journal
P. 11

The Role of Laparoscopic Surgery in the Surgical Treatment of HIV Patients
                                 World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, May-August 2008;1(2):9-14
            The Role of Laparoscopic Surgery in the

            Surgical Treatment of HIV Patients



            Vijaykumar Rajaram Naik
            Consultant Laparoscopic Surgeon and GI Endoscopist, Bel-air Hospital, Panchgani, Dist- Satara, Maharashtra, India





            AIMS OF STUDY                                      REVIEW OF LITERATURE
            The purpose of present study is to evaluate the role of  A computerized Medline Search was conducted from 1966
            laparoscopic surgery in the surgical treatment of HIV patients  through the present and turned up only 10 papers concerning
            (related or unrelated to HIV illness in whom requiring surgical  HIV positivity and surgery, none of them being in transgendered
                                                                                                        1
            intervention) by comparing results of open  surgeries with the  or transsexual individuals. In 1997, Flum and Wallack  conducted
            results of review articles on laparoscopic surgeries under  a literature search concerning the impact of the human
            following headings as:                             immunodeficiency virus infection and syndrome has had on
                                                               the practice of surgery. They concluded that the incidence of
            1. Universal precautions during surgery
            2. Procedure details                               human immunodeficiency virus infection ranges from 1.3% of
            3. Operation time                                  patients hospitalized at sentinel hospitals to 1.5/1,000 patients
            4. Blood loss                                      in lower risk environments. The rate of percutaneous injury
            5. Occupational exposure risk                      during an operation is 5 to 6% and human immunodeficiency
            6. Postoperative analgesics requirement            virus transmission after percutaneous injury with a needle
            7. Postoperative morbidity and mortality           contaminated with the human immunodeficiency virus is  3%.
            8. Economy                                         Furthermore, Lowenfels, Mehta, Levi, Montecalvo, Savino and
                                                                       2
                                                               Wormser  reported in 1993 on the incidents of percutaneous
                                                               injuries in surgeons. They reported that there was a decrease in
            INTRODUCTION
                                                               the frequency of reported percutaneous injuries over the period
            Despite much clinical experience, there are few published  1988 to 1993. The number of yearly injuries per surgeon
                                                                                                     1
            accounts of the surgical manifestations of HIV/AIDS and role  decreased from 5.5 to 2.1. As Flum and Wallack  reported, the
            of laparoscopic surgery in HIV patients. More than 40 million  transmission of human immunodeficiency virus after
            people worldwide are infected with HIV. Surgical treatment of  percutaneous injury with a needle contaminated with HIV is
            HIV-infected patients is indicated for problems both related  3%. It would therefore seem not particularly dangerous to the
                                    3
            and unrelated to HIV infection.  The laparoscopic surgeon plays  individual surgeon, providing universal precautions are
            an important role in the diagnosis and management of AIDS  undertaken, to undertake surgery on HIV positive patients. From
            related conditions in conjunction with physician. As most of  the first case in 1988 until mid 1995, our index of severity of HIV
            the HIV patients are poorly nourished, immunocompromised  infection was the CD4 Lymphocyte count. After this time the
            and final outcome of the open surgeries is not satisfactory.  viral load has been used and this is measured as viral RNA.
            Laparoscopic procedures provide several specific advantages  Before 1995, measurement of viral load was unavailable to us.
            over routine (open) procedures in this population. For the patient,  In 1901, first diagnostic laparoscopy was performed by Kelling
            the extent of invasiveness is diminished; incisions are  on dog. After him in 1910, a Swedish internist, Jacobaeusc
                  6
            limited,  associated with better preservation of the immune  performed first diagnostic laparoscopy in human. After that an
                                7
            system than open surgery  which decreases healing time and  era of minimal access surgery created outbreak in the treatment
            wound complications, pulmonary function is optimized; and  of HIV patients due its advantages over traditional open
            the patient rapidly returns to regular activity. Although CO 2  surgeries.
            pneumoperitoneum affects the peritoneal response to injury, it
            seems to have no harmful effect in terms of intra-abdominal  INDICATIONS OF LAPAROSCOPY IN HIV PATIENTS
            infection. For the surgical team, risk of exposure to body fluids  Indications of laparoscopy in surgical patients and HIV patients
            is minimized. 5                                    are almost same as HIV- negative patients.

                                                             9
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16