Page 7 - Journal of WALS
P. 7

WJOLS

          10.5005/jp-journals-10007-1151
                      Drainage in Cholecystectomy: Required or Not? A Comparative Randomized Study in Northern Indian Subjects
          ORIGINAL RESEARCH
          Drainage in Cholecystectomy: Required or Not?

          A Comparative Randomized Study in

          Northern Indian Subjects


          Aman Nagpal, Subhash Goyal, Latika Abbey, Abhishek Singh


          ABSTRACT                                            laparoscopic cholecystectomy has revolutionized this
                                                                       2
          Background: Routine abdominal drainage after laparoscopic  procedure.  The need to put a drain has always been a
          cholecystectomy is an issue of considerable debate in surgical  controversial subject in surgery. There are those who believe
          fraternity. So a comparative study was planned as an effort to  that all intraperitoneal operations should be drained and
          solve the controversy regarding the need of drainage in
          cholecystectomy.                                    there are others who feel drains are useless. Number of
                                                              drains available bears witness to the fact that no one is ideal
          Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate merits and demerits
          of drainage  vs nondrainage in patients undergone   or suitable for universal use.
          cholecystectomy.                                       Therapeutic drains are a necessity, prophylactic drains
          Materials and methods: Study was carried out in the  are in questions and perhaps this can be answered by age
          Department of General Surgery, MM Institute of Medical  old saying that drains cannot substitute a meticulous
          Sciences and Research between June 2009 and October 2011  technique. Higher wound infection has been reported in
          on 40 cases of symptomatic gall stone disease. Cases were  drain group.  Hospital stay is also prolonged as none of
                                                                        3
          divided randomly into two equal groups. Group A containing
          20 cases with drain placed and group B containing 20 cases  patient can be discharged on same day. Some studies have
          without drainage. Subjects were observed for postoperative  demonstrated that infection rate and reoperation rate were
          morbidity in the form of pain–incidence and severity, duration  not significantly different irrespective of whether drains
          of postoperative hospital stay, analgesia requirement,
          postoperative nausea, vomiting and antiemetics required.  were put or not. Also, some studies showed that post
                                                              laparoscopic cholecystectomy, pain was not statistically
          Results: Mean operative time in groups A and B was 93 and
          86 minutes respectively. Gallbladder rupture was most common  different between drain and no drain group.
          complication encountered in both the groups. At 12th   So, in review of this unresolved controversy regarding
          postoperative hour, 90% of patients of group A and 95% of  necessity of using drains in cholecystectomy present study
          patients of group B had pain in abdomen.
                                                              was planned with the aim to evaluate merits and demerits
          Conclusion: We found no significant advantage of using  of drainage vs nondrainage in the patients undergoing
          drainage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, as there was
          higher incidence of postoperative pain and longer duration of  cholecystectomy. Objectives of the study were to find out
          hospital stay with its use. Therefore, its routine use cannot be  incidence of postoperative morbidity in terms of
          recommended as a means to reducing postoperative morbidity.
                                                              complications among patients undergoing cholecystectomy
          Keywords: Cholecystectomy, Drainage, Postoperative care.  with and without drain and to detect difference in operative
          How to cite this article: Nagpal A, Goyal S, Abbey L, Singh A.  time and hospital stay in the above groups.
          Drainage in Cholecystectomy: Required or Not? A Comparative
          Randomized Study in Northern Indian Subjects. World J Lap  MATERIALS AND METHODS
          Surg 2012;5(2):63-66.
                                                              The present study was carried out in the Department of
          Source of support: Nil
                                                              General Surgery, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of
          Conflict of interest: None declared
                                                              Medical Sciences and Research (MMIMSR), Mullana
                                                              (Ambala) between June 2009 and October 2011 in which
          INTRODUCTION
                                                              40 cases of symptomatic gallstone disease were admitted
          Cholelithiasis is among the most common gastrointestinal  for cholecystectomy included in the study. These 40 cases
          illness requiring hospitalization and frequently occurs in  were randomized into two groups equally, group A contains
                1
          young.  Cholelithiasis and associated complications are the  20 cases with drain placed in subhepatic space and brought
          leading causes of surgical entry into the peritoneal cavity  out through right anterior axillary port and group B contains
          in Northern India. Cholecystectomy remains the treatment  20 cases without drain.
          of choice of symptomatic gall stones despite the challenges  The inclusion criteria’s for study group were symptoms
          of dissolution therapy and lithotripsy. The introduction of  consistent with biliary colic, fit for general anesthesia and
          World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, May-August 2012;5(2):63-66                                 63
   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12