Page 11 - Journal of WALS
P. 11

WJOLS

          10.5005/jp-journals-10007-1152
           ORIGINAL RESEARCH                                   Making Robotic Surgery Easier and Safer: A Clinical Review
          Making Robotic Surgery Easier and Safer: A Clinical Review


          Meenakshi Jain



          ABSTRACT                                            simple intent was to learn it, do some cases and then walk
                                                              away from it guilt-free. Then I would have the first-hand
          The author proposes an alternative method of robotic docking
          for gynecologic total robotic hysterectomy surgery. In this side-  knowledge, perspective and practical experience I needed
          docking method, the robot is docked on the side of the patient.  to easily convince myself, my peers and my patients that
          The remainder of the patient and trocar setup is similar to  my initial gut feelings about robotic surgery were correct,
          traditional docking. The author has had an excellent experience
          with this method as there does not seem to be an increased  that it was indeed a gimmick and provided neither perceived
          risk of robotic arm collision as long as the surgeon respects the  nor actual benefit over traditional laparoscopic surgery.
          basic principle of maintaining at least an 8 to 10 cm distance  I had reservations about using this new technology to
          between each of the instrument ports.
                                                              treat patients who I was convinced I could treat
          Keywords:  Robotic hysterectomy, DaVinci hysterectomy,  laparoscopically. To overcome my reservations, I only used
          Robotic surgery.
                                                              this technique on very complex cases. The first 10 robotic
          How to cite this article: Jain M. Making Robotic Surgery Easier  cases I performed were only on patients who were very
          and Safer: A Clinical Review. World J Lap Surg 2012;5(2):  obese, very complex and had very large uteri, factors which
          67-71.
                                                              I knew would lead me to not even attempt laparoscopy to
          Source of support: Nil                              begin with.
          Conflict of interest: None declared                    Surprisingly, I was able to do seven of those ten complex
                                                              cases robotically. I was thrilled and realized I had saved
          INTRODUCTION                                        seven of my patients from all the potential consequences of
                                                              a long hospitalization and the longer recovery times typically
          I did not want to learn robotics. I was quite content doing
          most of my hysterectomies and other gynecological   associated with an open surgery. So I continued to do
          procedures laparoscopically.                        robotics but only in very select cases.
             I was considered a skilled surgeon by my peers, and
          I felt good about myself. I felt as though I was part of an  CONCERNS ABOUT ROBOTICS
          elite and talented group of surgeons, who were able to do  But I still was not completely convinced of the benefits of
          advanced laparoscopic surgeries and could give their patient  robotics to use as a replacement to laparoscopy. I had the
          multiple minimally invasive alternatives to traditional  following concerns, which stopped me from incorporating
          surgery like LASH, TLH, LAVH, laparoscopic          robotics completely in my practice.
          myomectomies, etc. The percentage of my patients requiring  1. Lack of control. I was away from my patient and I felt
          an abdominal hysterectomy was about 10% or less, all the  that in the case of an emergency I would not be able
          more telling when compared with the 70% average in the  to convert to a laparotomy rapidly and easily.
          rest of the USA.                                      2. There were too many people in the operating room,
             When my hospital administrator Mr Conroy approached  there were extra staff, Da Vinci reps, an extra
          me with the possibility of purchasing a DaVinci robot for  anesthesiologist. All this caused too much commotion
          the hospital and asked for my support, I clearly informed  and confusion.
          him of my total lack of interest in this new technology. I  3. The size, presence and operation of the robot appeared
          went on and further reiterated my firm belief that this  very intimidating and cumbersome.
          methodology had no benefits over laparoscopy and was  4. Docking between the legs was especially difficult, it
          merely a gimmick.                                       took a long time and appeared very problematic.
             Despite my feelings and reservations, I could not deny  5. My assistant was not able to manipulate the uterus
          the rapid incorporation of this new technique in the USA  the way I wanted, which made the case very frustrating
          and the growing claims of potential benefits in using this  and as I was away from my patient, even I could not
          technology, especially in benign gynecology and         manipulate the uterus myself.
          gynecological oncology.                               6. I was not used to routinely doing port placement above
             To clear my conscience, I decided to go through the  the umbilicus in the right and left upper quadrants, so
          motions of learning robotics. Four years ago, my clear and  I felt somewhat out of my comfort zone.
          World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, May-August 2012;5(2):67-71                                 67
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16