Page 27 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery

WJOLS

Laparoscopic Appendectomy as a Standard of Care for Both Complicated and Uncomplicated Appendicitis in South Africa
The main cause of morbidity was ventilator-associated REFERENCES
pneumonia and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). These 1. Ekah AP, Wozniak CJ, Monson B, Crawford J, McCarthy MC.
were patients who were admitted to intensive care unit Laparoscopic in the contemporary management of acute
(ICU). Also, improvement in ICU care and appropriate appendicitis. Am J Surg 2007 Mar;193(3):310-314.
use of venous thromboembolism are measures we should 2. Garbutt JM, Soper NJ, Shannon WD, Botero A, Littenberg B.
improve on. Meta analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing
Mortality was 1.7%, which is higher than reported laparoscopic and conventional appendectomy. Surg Laparosc
Endosc 1999 Jan;9(1):17-26.
18
by other researchers. Majority of the causes were 3. Chung RS, Rowland DY, Li P, Diaz J. A meta analysis of ran-
nonprocedure-related causes. Systemic sepsis and acute domized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional
respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) contributed to a appendectomy. Am J Surg 1999 Mar;177(3):250-256.
significant proportion to mortality. Both of the causes 4. Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D. Laparoscopic versus open appen-
dectomy: a meta analysis. J Am Coll Surg 1998 May;186(5):
were found in the four-quadrant pus subgroup. Majority 545-553.
of these patients were delayed presentation and often 5. Slim K, Pezet D, Chipponi J. Laparoscopic or open appen-
came in septic shock and needed postoperative care dectomy? Critical review of randomized controlled trials.
in ICU. Many of them were ventilated for more than Dis Colon Rectum 1998 Mar;41(3):398-403.
a week. Therefore, delayed presentation, septic shock, 6. Long KH, Bannon MP, Zietlow SP, Helgeson ER, Harmsen WS,
Smith CD, Ilstrup DM, Baerga-Varela Y, Sarr MG, Laparo-
and prolong ICU stay seem to be a major contributing scopic Appendectomy Interest Group. A prospective random-
factors to mortality. ized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open
The results of this study seem to be comparable to appendectomy: clinical and economic analyses. Surgery 2001
previous studies and the negative outcome seen in the Apr;129(4):390-400.
four-quadrant pus subgroup seem to be due to patients’ 7. Fingerhut A, Millat B, Borrie F. Laparoscopic versus open
appendectomy: time to decide. World J Surg 1999 Aug;23(8):
factors and not procedure-related. 835-845.
8. Maxwell JG, Robinson CL, Maxwell TG, Maxwell BG, Smith CR,
CONCLUSION Brinker CC. Deriving the indications for laparoscopic appen-
dectomy from a comparison of the outcomes of laparoscopic
The positive outcome found in this study when LA was and open appendectomy. Am J Surg 2001 Dec;182(6):687-692.
used in both complicated and uncomplicated cases of 9. Peiser JG, Greenberg D. Laparoscopic versus open appen-
acute appendicitis suggests that this approach is possible dectomy: results of a retrospective comparison in an Israeli
in carefully selected patients and with appropriate basic hospital. Isr Med Assoc J 2002 Feb;4:91-94.
laparoscopic skills. 10. Garg CP, Vaidya BB, Chengalath MM. Efficacy of laparoscopy
in complicated appendicitis. Int J Surg 2009 Jun;7(3):250-252.
However, we recognize the limitations of our study: 11. Frazee RC, Bohannon WT. Laparoscopic appendectomy for
Retrospective study, with a small study population size. complicated appendicitis. Arch Surg 1996 May;131(5):509-512.
Therefore, more studies with large population size are 12. Pai PS, Towson JA, Anthone GJ, Ortega AE, Simons AJ,
needed to establish the role of LA as the standard of care Beart RW Jr. Intra abdominal abscesses following laparo-
in both complicated and uncomplicated cases of appen- scopic and open appendectomies. J Gastrointest Surg 1997
Mar-Apr;1(2):188-192.
dicitis (Appendix 1). 19 13. Ball CG, Kortbeck JB, Kirkpatrick AW, Mitchell P. Laparoscopic
appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: an evaluation of
postoperative factors. Surg Endosc 2004 Jun;18(6):969-973.
Appendix 1: Alvarado score 14. Sakpal SV, Bindra SS, Chamberlain RS. Laparoscopic appen-
dectomy conversion rates two decades later: an analysis of
Variables Clinical features Score surgeon and patient-specific factors resulting in open conver-
Symptoms Migratory RIF pain 1 sion. J Surg Res 2012 Jul;176(1):42-49.
Anorexia 1 15. Bombil I, Lunda WS, Maraj A. Laparoscopic appendectomy
for complicated appendicitis at Sebokeng Hospital. J Dent
Nausea and vomiting 1 Med Sci 2015 Dec;14(12):65-69.
Signs Tenderness (RIF) 2 16. Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorgyan A, Essani R.
Rebound tenderness 1 Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy a prospective ran-
domized double-blind study. Ann Surg 2005 Sep;242(3):439-450.
Elevated temperature 1 17. Tate JJ. Laparoscopic appendectomy. Br J Surg 1996 Sep;83
Laboratory Leukocytosis 2 (9):1169-1170.
Shift to left (neutrophils) 1 18. Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H, Muhlbaier LH, Peterson ED,
Total score 10 Eubanks S, Pietrobon R. Laparoscopic versus open appendec-
tomy outcomes comparison based on a large administrative
Score Significance Plan database. Ann Surg 2004 Jan;239(1):43-52.
≤ 3 Appendicitis unlikely Observation 19. Mckay R, Shepherd J. The use of the clinical scoring system
4–6 Appendicitis likely Imaging (U/S or CT) by Alvarado in the decision to perform computed tomogra-
7–10 Appendicitis highly likely phy for acute appendicitis in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2007
Jun;25(5):489-493.
World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, January-April 2017;10(1):22-25 25