Page 19 - WJOLS - Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 19

Abhay Singhal et al
          able to attain a three-dimensional surgical view enabling   gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: five-year results of a ran-
                                     ®
          depth perception, the EndoWrist  technology which allows   domized prospective trial. Ann Surg 2005 Feb;241(2):232-237.
          for seven degrees of freedom, tremor suppression and filtra-    5.  Kim HH, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, Kim MC, Han SU, Kim W,
                                                                  Ryu SW, Lee HJ, Song KY. Morbidity and mortality of lapa-
          tion, and improved ergonomics. 10-13  Additionally, images   roscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric
          can be enlarged enabling the performance of delicate steps,   cancer: an interim report–a phase III multicenter, prospective,
          such as lymph node dissection along great vessels which   randomized Trial (KLASS Trial). Ann Surg 2010 Mar;251(3):
          are essential in achieving a D2 dissection, suturing, or knot-  417-420.
          ting. These features could enable the performance of rela-    6.  Kodera Y, Fujiwara M, Ohashi N, Nakayama G, Koike M,
          tively complicated procedures, such as function-preserving   Morita S, Nakao A. Laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer:
                                                                  a collective review with metaanalysis of randomized trials.
          gastrectomy or extended resections for advanced gastric   J Am Coll Surg 2010 Nov;211(5):677-686.
          cancer using a minimally invasive method. 23          7.  Ding J, Liao GQ, Liu HL, Tang J. Meta-analysis of laparoscopy-
             Encouraging results are being published using the    assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection
          robotic technique, but the lack of homogeneous study    for gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol 2012 Mar;105(3):297-303.
          groups in terms of staging, comorbidities, and adjuvant     8.  Yamamoto M, Rashid OM, Wong J. Surgical management of
                                                                  gastric cancer: the East vs West perspective. J Gastrointest
          and neoadjuvant therapies makes it hard to establish a   Oncol 2015 Feb;6(1):79-88.
          clear indication for RG in gastric cancer. Carefully weigh-    9.  Kim MC, Jung GJ, Kim HH. Learning curve of laparoscopy-
          ing the treatment options is especially important since   assisted distal gastrectomy with systemic lymphadenec-
          there are more and more groups publishing acceptable    tomy for early gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2005
          results with the robotic technique.                     Dec;11(47):7508-7511.
             Nonetheless, there are a series of shortcomings of the     10.  Song J, Oh SJ, Kang WH, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH.
                                                                  Robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for
          robotic platform explaining this situation. First of all, the   gastric cancer: lessons learned from an initial 100 consecutive
          lack of robotic staplers and robotic seal and cut devices,   procedures. Ann Surg 2009 Jun;249(6):927-932.
          such as LigaSure™ is a considerable inconvenience.     11.  Song J, Kang WH, Oh SJ, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH. Role
          Second, due to the costs and duration of the procedures,   of robotic gastrectomy using da Vinci system compared with
          the robotic platform cannot be used to cover the whole   laparoscopic gastrectomy: initial experience of 20 consecutive
                                                                  cases. Surg Endosc 2009 Jun;23(6):1204-1211.
          spectrum of procedures normally performed by a general     12.  Hashizume M, Sugimachi K. Robot-assisted gastric surgery.
          surgeon. 21                                             Surg Clin North Am 2003 Dec;83(6):1429-1444.
                                                                13.  Kakeji Y, Konishi K, Ieiri S, Yasunaga T, Nakamoto M, Tanoue K,
          CONCLUSION                                              Baba H, Maehara Y, Hashizume M. Robotic laparoscopic
                                                                  distal gastrectomy: a comparison of the da Vinci and Zeus
          Within the limitation of a small-sized, nonrandomized   systems. Int J Med Robot 2006 Dec;2(4):299-304.
          analysis, our study confirms that robot-assisted gastrec-    14.  Procopiuc L, Tudor Ş, Mănuc M, Diculescu M, Vasilescu C.
          tomy is a feasible and safe surgical procedure. When    Robot-assisted surgery for gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest
          compared with conventional laparoscopy, robotic surgery   Oncol 2016 Jan;8(1):8-17.
          shows evident benefits in performing lymphadenectomy     15.  Cianchi F, Indennitate G, Trallori G, Ortolani M, Paoli B,
          with a higher number of retrieved and examined lymph    Macrì G, Lami G, Mallardi B, Badii B, Staderini F, et al.
                                                                  Robotic vs laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph-
          nodes, and also the use of robotics is a good option for   adenectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective comparative
          the upcoming surgeons since only less than 10 cases of   monoinstitutional study. BMC Surg 2016 Sep;16:65.
          robotic surgery are needed to become proficient in gastric     16.  Parisi A, Reim D, Borghi F, Nguyen NT, Qi F, Coratti A,
          cancer surgery.                                         Cianchi F, Cesari M, Bazzocchi F, Alimoglu O, et al. Mini-
                                                                  mally invasive surgery for gastric cancer: a comparison
          REFERENCES                                              between robotic, laparoscopic and open surgery. World
                                                                  J Gastroenterol 2017 Apr;23(13):2376-2384.
            1.  Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Uyama I, Sugihara K, Tanigawa N, The     17.  Hong SS, Son SY, Shin HJ, Cui LH, Hur H, Han SU. Can
              Japanese Laparoscopic Surgery Study Group. A multicenter   robotic gastrectomy surpass laparoscopic gastrectomy by
              study on oncologic outcome of laparoscopic gastrectomy for   acquiring long-term experience? A propensity score analysis
              early cancer in Japan. Ann Surg 2007 Jan;245(1):68-72.  of a 7-year experience at a single institution. J Gastric Cancer
            2.  Koeda K, Nishizuka S, Wakabayashi G. Minimally invasive   2016 Dec;16(4):240-246.
              surgery for gastric cancer: the future standard of care. World     18.  Shen W, Xi H, Wei B, Cui J, Bian S, Zhang K, Wang N, Huang X,
              J Surg 2011 Jul;35(7):1469-1477.                    Chen L. Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric
            3.  Hayashi H, Ochiai T, Shimada H, Gunji Y. Prospective ran-  cancer: comparison of short-term surgical outcomes. Surg
              domized study of open versus laparoscopy-assisted distal   Endosc 2016 Feb;30(2):574-580.
              gastrectomy with extraperigastric lymph node dissection for     19.  Kim HI, Han SU, Yang HK, Kim YW, Lee HJ, Ryu KW, Park JM,
              early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 2005 Sep;19(9):1172-1176.  An JY, Kim MC, Park S, et al. Multicenter prospective com-
            4.  Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, Sansonetti A, Di Paola M,    parative study of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for
              Recher A, Ponzano C. Laparoscopic versus open subtotal   gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2016 Jan;263(1):103-109.
          100
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24