Page 16 - WJOLS - Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 16

WJOLS



                                                            Two-port Mini LC vs Conventional Four-port vs Single-incision LC





















                                       Fig. 3: SILS port and technique of insertion of SILS port

          CONCLUSION                                            9.  Poon CM, Chan KW, Lee DW, Chan KC, Ko CW, Cheung HY,
                                                                  Lee KW. Two-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystec-
          In our conclusion, LC can be performed with two-port    tomy. Surg Endosc 2003 Oct;17(10):1624-1626.
          technique in properly selected cases and optimize the     10.  Ramachandran CS, Arora V. Two-port laparoscopic cholecys-
          benefits of minimal access surgeries. Two-port mini     tectomy: an innovative new method for gallbladder removal.
          LC resulted in reduced pain, need for analgesia, and    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 1998 Oct;8(5):303-308.
          improved cosmesis without increasing the operative time     11.  Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Trap R, Kehlet H, Rosenburg J. Micro-
          and complication rates compared with that in four-port LC   laparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy:
                                                                  a prospective randomized double-blind trial. Surg Endosc
          or SILC. Hence, two-port mini LC can be tried firstly and   2002 Mar;16(3):458-464.
          can be continued with addition of fourth port if necessary.    12.  Schwenk W, Neudecker J, Mall J, Bohm B, Muller JM. Prospec-
                                                                  tive randomized blinded trial of pulmonary function, pain,
          REFERENCES                                              and cosmetic results after laparoscopic vs. microlaparoscopic
                                                                  cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2000 Apr;14(4):345-348.
            1.  Soper NJ, Barteau JA, Clayman RV. Comparison of early     13.  Look M, Chew SP, Tan YC, Liew SE, Cheong DM, Tan JC,
              postoperative results for laparoscopic vs standard open   Wee SB, Teh CH, Low CH. Post-operative pain in needle-
              cholecystectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992 Feb;174(2):114-118.  scopic versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy:
            2.  de la Fuente SG, Demaria EJ, Reynolds JD, Portenier DD,   a prospective randomised trial. J R Coll Surg Edinb 2001
              Pryor AD. New developments in surgery: Natural Trans-  Jun;46(3):138-142.
              luminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES). Arch Surg 2007     14.  Lomanto D, De Angelis L, Ceci V, Dalsasso G, So J, Frat-
              Mar;142(3):295-297.                                 taroli FM, Muthiah R, Speranza V. Two-trocar laparoscopic
            3.  Curcillo PG 2nd, Wu AS, Podolsky ER, Graybeal C, Katk-  cholecystectomy: A reproducible technique. Surg Laparosc
              houda N, Saenz A, Dunham R, Fendley S, Neff M, Copper C,   Endosc Percutan Tech 2001 Aug;11(4):248-251.
              et al. SPATM cholecystectomy: a multi-institutional report.     15.  Alponat A, Cubukcu A, Gonullu N, Canturk Z, Ozbay O.
              Surg Endosc 2010 Aug;24(8):1854-1860.               Is minisite cholecystectomy less traumatic? Prospective
            4.  Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, Carcoforo P, Donini I.   randomized study comparing minisite and conventional
              One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1997   laparoscopic cholecystectomies. World J Surg 2002 Dec;26(12):
              May;84(5):695-697.                                  1437-1440.
            5.  Kalloo A, Singh V, Jagannath S. Flexible transgastric peri-    16.  Sarli L, Iusco D, Gobbi S, Porrini C, Ferro C, Roncoroni L.
              toneoscopy a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic   Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy
              interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc   performed with mini-instruments. Br J Surg 2003;90:
              2004 Jul;60(1):114-117.                             1345-1348.
            6.  Mori T, Ikeda Y, Okamoto K, Sakata K, Ideguchi K, Nakagawa K,      17.  Novitsky YW, Kercher KW, Czerniach DR, Kaban GK, Khera S,
              Yasumitsu T. A new technique for two-trocar laparoscopic   Gallagher-Dorval KA, Callery MP, Litwin DE, Kelly JJ.
              cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2002 Apr;16(4):589-591.  Advantages of mini-laparoscopic vs conventional lapa-
            7.  Slim K, Pezet D, Stencl J Jr, Lechner C, Le Roux S, Lointier P,   roscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 2005 Dec;140(12):
              Chipponi J. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an original three-  1178-1183.
              trocar technique. World J Surg 1995 May-Jun;19(3):394-397.    18.  Lai EC, Fok M, Chan AS. Needloscopic cholecystectomy:
            8.  NIH Consensus Conference: Gallstones and laparoscopic   prospective study of 150 patients. Hong Kong Med J 2003
              cholecystectomy. JAMA 1993 Feb;269(8):1018-1024.    Aug;9(4):238-242.







          World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, September-December 2017;10(3):95-97                        97
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21