Page 13 - WJOLS - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 13

RESEARCH ARTICLE
            Hemorrhoidectomy with Harmonic Scalpel vs Conventional

            Hemorrhoidectomy


                                                      3
                                          2
                         1
            Hana Alhomoud  , Mohamed Mohsen  , Salah Termos
             AbstrAct
             Background: Hemorrhoidal disease is one of the most frequently encountered anorectal conditions in the clinical practice. A variety of instruments
             including circular staplers, harmonic scalpel, laser, and bipolar electrothermal devices are currently used when performing hemorrhoidectomy
             grades III and IV.
             Objective: This study compares outcomes between hemorrhoidectomy performed with harmonic scalpel and conventional methods.
             Materials and methods: A prospective randomized study of consecutive 50 patients who underwent hemorrhoidectomy between January 2017
             and October 2017. Patients were randomly enrolled in two different groups. Group I consisted of 25 patients who underwent hemorrhoidectomy
             using an ultrasonic scalpel device (harmonic) and group II with 25 patients who had conventional hemorrhoidectomy.
             Results: The patients’ demographics data and clinical characteristics were similar in both groups. The harmonic group had a shorter operation
             time, less postoperative pain, less postoperative bleeding, and shorter hospital stay.
             Conclusion: Harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy appears to be a better procedure for symptomatic grades III and IV hemorrhoids with ease
             of operating due to less bleeding, less postoperative pain, and patient acceptance. Long-term follow-up with larger scale studies is required.
             Keywords: Harmonic scalpel, Hemorrhoids, Milligan–Morgan procedure.
             World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery (2018): 10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1352



            IntroductIon                                       1,2   Department of Surgery, Al-Sabah Hospital, Alyarmouk, Kuwait
            Hemorrhoidectomy is the standard treatment for patients   3   Department of Surgery, Amiri Hospital, Kuwait city, Kuwait
                                      1
            with grade III or IV hemorrhoids.   Milligan and Morgan open   Corresponding Author: Hana Alhomoud, Department of Surgery,
            hemorrhoidectomy or Ferguson closed hemorrhoidectomy is   Al-Sabah Hospital, Alyarmouk, Kuwait, Phone: +965 99227676, e-mail:
            still the gold standard for surgical treatment of symptomatic   hana_alhomoud@hotmail.com
                       2
            hemorrhoids.   However, both are associated with significant   How to cite this article: Alhomoud H, Mohsen M,  et  al.  Hem-

            postoperative pain and complicaions such as urinary retention,   orrhoidectomy with Harmonic Scalpel vs Conventional Hemorrhoid-
            constipation, postoperative bleeding, anal incontinence, and anal   ectomy. World J Lap Surg 2018;11(3):121–123.
                  3
            stenosis.                                          Source of support: Nil


               As a result, various types of surgical equipment have been   Conflict of interest: None

            introduced to overcome the postoperative pain and bleeding.
               The  operative procedures  vary from  conventional
            cautery dissection to vessel-sealers, harmonic scalpels, laser
            hemorrhoidectomy, and stapling devices.               Patients were randomized into two groups: group I consist of 25
               A harmonic scalpel is a device that simultaneously cuts and   patients who had hemorrhoidectomy using harmonic scalpel and
            coagulates tissues by producing a vibration of 55.5 kHz. When   group II with 25 patients who had conventional hemorrhoidectomy.
            compared with conventional electrosurgical devices, this ultrasonic   All patients underwent preoperative lab tests, chest X-rays,
            cutting and coagulating device has advantages such as causing   electrocadiography, and urinanalysis and were admitted to the
            minimal lateral tissue injury 1–3 mm wide, less fumes, more localized   hospital the day before surgery. All patients were fully informed
                  4
            impact,   better hemostasis, less stimulation to neuromuscular   about the procedure and possible complications, and a written
            tissues, and local control of the surgical site compared to a   consent was given. All patients had a glycerin enema the night
            hemorrhoidectomy performed with surgical scissors or monopolar   before surgery and prophylactic antibiotics were injected before
                        5
            electric cautery.                                  surgery.
               The aim of this study was to analyze and compare between   The outcome factors including intraoperative bleeding,
            conventional hemorrhoidectomy and hemorrhoidectomy   postoperative pain (on VAS scale), postoperative bleeding, urinary
            performed with harmonic scalpel.                   retention, and anal stenosis were compared between the two
                                                               groups.
            MAterIAls And Methods                                 All data were collected and analyzed using SPSS 2 version.
            A prospective randomized study involving 50 patients who were   Chi-square test and student t  test were performed for com-

            operated for symptomatic grade III and IV hemorrhoids, in Sabah   parison of groups. A p value <0.05 was considered as statistically
            Hospital, Kuwait, between January 2017 and October 2017.  significant.


            © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.
            org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to
            the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain
            Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18