Page 16 - WJOLS - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 16

RESEARCH ARTICLE
            Factors Guarantee Competence of Laparoscopic Repair of

            Inguinal Hernia


                     1
                                   2
            Amr Elheny , Khaled Mahran , Abdel F Saleh 3
             AbstrAct
             Aim: To evaluate the impact of age, type of hernia, size of the mesh used, and fixation of the mesh on the competence of laparoscopic repair
             of inguinal hernia.
             Materials and methods: Randomized controlled clinical study carried out from November 2016 to July 2017 in 98 patients with inguinal hernias
             admitted to surgery Department of Minia University Hospital. Patients were divided into two groups randomly. Group I includes 49 patients
             who underwent laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernioplasty and group II includes 49 patients who underwent laparoscopic
             totally extra peritoneal (TEP) hernioplasty with and without fixation of the mesh.
             Results: Operative time in group I ranges between 40 minutes and 110 minutes with mean time of about 66.85 minutes, while in group II ranges
             between 20 minutes and 105 minutes with mean time of about 52.65 minutes. This difference was statistically significant. Pain was 8.2% in
             group I and 10.2% in group II. Scrotal edema was 0% in all patients in both groups. Urinary retention was 2% in group I and 4.1% in group II.
             Seroma was the same (6.1%) in both groups. Recurrence after 6-month follow-up was 2% in both groups. All recurrent cases are nonfixed.
             Conclusion: There is no difference between TEP and TAPP, but TAPP technique appears to be superior to the TEP repair in patients undergoing
             unilateral inguinal hernia repair.
             Clinical significance: The TEP approach can be offered to patients with bilateral and recurrent hernias. TEP procedure was associated with
             more adverse events during surgery but less postoperative pain, faster recovery of daily activities, quicker return to work, and less impairment
             of sensibility after 1 year.
             Keywords: Inguinal hernia, Laparoscopic, Minia.
             World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery (2018): 10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1353



            IntroductIon                                       1–3   Department of General Surgery, Minia University, Minia, Egypt
            Inguinal hernias comprise approximately 7% of all surgical   Corresponding Author: Amr Elheny, Department of General Surgery,
            outpatient visits. Male-to-female ratio is 8:1. They affect 1–3% of   Minia University, Minia, Egypt, Phone: +20 1277340340, e-mail: amr_
            young children. In men, the incidence rises from 11 per 10,000   elheny@yahoo.com
            person-years, aged 16–24 years, to 200 per 10,000 person-years,   How to cite this article: Elheny A, Mahran K, et al.  Factors Guarantee
                             1
            aged 75 years or above.                            Competence of Laparoscopic Repair of Inguinal Hernia. World J Lap
               Conventionally, there are two types of inguinal hernia:   Surg 2018;11(3):124–127.
            Indirect—a protrusion through the internal inguinal ring passes   Source of support: Nil


            along the inguinal canal through the abdominal wall, running   Conflict of interest: None

            laterally to the inferior epigastric vessels. This is the more common
            form accounting for 80% of inguinal hernias, especially in children. It
            is associated with failure of the inguinal canal to close properly after   technique. The three techniques are based on the principles of
            passage of the testis in utero or during the neonatal period. Direct—  using mesh prosthesis to cover the defect of the abdominal wall
            the hernia protrudes directly through a weakness in the posterior   from inside. 7–9
            wall of the inguinal canal, running medially to the inferior epigastric   The advantages over conventional surgery are primarily pain
                                                         2
            vessels. It is more common in the elderly and rare in children.    reduction, shorter length of hospital stay, and faster resumption of
               Inguinal hernia repair is the most frequently performed   usual activities. In addition, many studies also show lower morbidity
                                                                                                    10
            operation in general surgery. The standard method for inguinal   rates and less impairment of the immune system.
            hernia repair had changed little over a hundred years until the   Disadvantages of the laparoscopic technique compared with
            introduction of synthetic mesh. This mesh can be placed by either   conventional surgery include the higher operating room costs, time
            using an open approach or by using a minimal access laparoscopic   consuming specially in the early learning curve of the surgeons, and
                                                                                       11
                    3
            technique.                                         the need for general anesthesia.
               Although open mesh-based tension-free repair remains the
            standard operation, laparoscopic hernioplasty in the hands of
            adequately trained surgeons produces excellent results comparable   objectIve
            to those of open repair. 4–6                       The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of age, type
               The  techniques  of  laparoscopic  hernioplasty  include   of hernia, size of the mesh used, and fixation of the mesh on the
            TAPP, TEP approach, and intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM)    competence of laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia.


            © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.
            org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to
            the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain
            Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21