Page 12 - WJOLS - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 12

Evaluation of Abdominal Malignancies by Minimal Access Surgery
            were diagnosed unresectable on laparoscopy. The reasons for     8.  Leake PA, Cardoso R, et al. A systematic review of the accuracy
            unresectability were liver metastasis in 53 (21.2%), fixity to adjacent   and indications for diagnostic laparoscopy prior to curative-intent
            structures in 64 (25.6%), peritoneal metastasis in 54 (21.6%) and   resection of gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2012;15(1):S38–S47. DOI:
            omental metastasis in 59 (23.6%) patients that could be diagnosed on   10.1007/s10120-011-0047-z.
            laparoscopy. Thus 111 (44.44%) patients were subjected to definitive     9.  Jiminez RE, Warshaw AL, et al. Impact of laparoscopic staging in the
                                                                    treatment of pancreatic cancer. Arch Surg 1999;135(4):409–415. DOI:
            surgery depending upon the type of abdominal malignancy after   10.1001/archsurg.135.4.409.
            diagnostic laparoscopy. Rest of the patients had undergone palliative     10.  Reddy KR, Levi J, et al. Experience with staging laparoscopy in
            management depending upon the type of malignancy and were   pancreatic malignancy. Gastrointest Endosc 1999;49(4):498–503.
            subjected to chemotherapy. Because of the use of diagnostic staging   DOI: 10.1016/S0016-5107(99)70050-7.
            laparoscopy, out of 250 patients, in 120 (48%) cases, nontherapeutic     11.  Ahmed SI, Bochkarev V, et al. Patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma
            laparotomy could be prevented and could be subjected to further   benefit From staging laparoscopy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech
            palliative management like chemotherapy without much delay and   2006;16(5):458–463. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2006.16.458.
            minimum morbidity. The advantages are very minimal procedure-    12.  Ari D, Brooks MD, et al. The value of laparoscopy in the management
            related complications, no pain, faster recovery minimum morbidity,   of ampullary, duodenal, and distal bile duct tumors. J Gastrointest
                                                                    Surg 2002;6(2):139–146.
            no mortality, no procedure-related adverse oncological effects. Out     13.  Christopher  JB, Keith  DL, et al. Diagnostic laparoscopy for
            of 250 patients of abdominal malignancies, 109 (43.6%) patients had   periampullary and pancreatic cancer: What is the true benefit?
            positive peritoneal cytology who also had metastases proven with   J Gastrointest Surg 2002;6(1):75–81.
            laparoscopic staging. The sensitivity and specificity of laparoscopy     14.  Weber SM, DeMatteo RP, et al. Staging laparoscopy in patients with
            in abdominal malignancies to detect resectable disease was 93.88%   extrahepatic biliary carcinoma. Analysis of 100 patients. Ann Surg
            and 54.44%, respectively.                               2002;235(3):392–399. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200203000-00011.
                                                                 15.  Tilleman EH, de Castro SM, et al. Diagnostic laparoscopy and
                                                                    laparoscopic ultrasound for staging of patients with malignant
            conclusIon                                              proximal bile duct obstruction. J Gastrointest Surg 2002;6(3):426–431.
            This study highlights the emphatic utility of diagnostic laparoscopy   DOI: 10.1016/S1091-255X(02)00005-7, discussion 430431.
            procedures in staging and management of abdominal malignancy.     16.  Goere D, Wagholikar GD, et al. Utility of staging laparoscopy in
            Laparoscopic evaluation of a patient with intra-abdominal   subsets of biliary cancers: laparoscopy is a powerful diagnostic tool
                                                                    in patients with intrahepatic and gallbladder carcinoma. Surg Endosc
            malignancies is a desirable tool against imaging modalities in   2006;20(5):721–725. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0583-x.
            improving the detection of metastatic disease and accurate staging     17.  Rahusen FD, Cuesta MA, et al. Selection of patients for resection of
            of the disease process.                                 colorectal metastases to the liver using diagnostic laparoscopy and
                                                                    laparoscopic ultrasonography. Ann Surg 1999;230(1):31–37. DOI:
                                                                    10.1097/00000658-199907000-00005.
            lImItAtIons of study
                                                                 18.  Jarnagin WR, Conlon K, et al. Clinical scoring system predicts
            Long-term follow-up of patients could not be done.      the yield of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with potentially
                                                                    resectable hepatic colorectal metastases. Cancer 2001;91(6):1121–
            references                                              1128. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010315)91:6<1121::AID-CNCR1108>
                                                                    3.0.CO;2-2.
              1.  Conlon KC, Minnard EA. The Value of Laparoscopic Staging in Upper     19.  Grobmyer SR, Fong Y, et al. Diagnostic laparoscopy prior to
                Gastrointestinal Malignancy. Oncologist 1997;2(1):10–17.  planned hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. Arch Surg
              2.  Armenta JF, Iqbal A, et al. Resolution and magnification of the   2004;139(12):1326–1330. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.139.12.1326.
                laparoscope: an observational analysis. Asociación Mexicana de     20.  Weitz J, D’Angelica M, et al. Selective use of diagnostic laparoscopy
                Cirugía Endoscópica, A.C 2004;5(2):104–106.         prior to planned hepatectomy for patients with hepatocellular
              3.  Ramshaw BJ, Esartia P, et al. Laparoscopy for diagnosis and staging   carcinoma. Surgery 2004;135(3):273–281. DOI: 10.1016/
                of malignancy. Semin Surg Oncol 1999;16(4):279–283. DOI: 10.1002/  j.surg.2003.07.004.
                (SICI)1098-2388(199906)16:4<279::AID-SSU2>3.0.CO;2-4.    21.  Lai EC, Tang CN, et al. The evolving influence of laparoscopy and
              4.  Muntean V, Oniu T, et al. Staging laparoscopy in digestive cancers.     laparoscopic ultrasonography on patients with hepatocellular
                J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2009;18(4):461–467.      carcinoma. Am J Surg 2008;196(5):736–740. DOI: 10.1016/
              5.  Vainio A, Auken M.  Prevalence of Symptoms Among Patients With   j.amjsurg.2007.08.073.
                Advanced Cancer: An International Collaborative Study. J Pain     22.  Marmor RA, Kelly KJ, et al. Laparoscopy is safe and accurate to
                Symptom Manag 1996;12(1);3–10. 10.1016/0885-3924(96)00042-5.  evaluate peritoneal surface metastasis prior to cytoreductive surgery.
              6.  Burke EC, Karpeh MS, et al. Laparoscopy in the management of   Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23(5):1461–1467. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4958-
                gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 1997;225(3):262–267. DOI:   5.
                10.1097/00000658-199703000-00004.                23.  Nieveen van Dijkum EJM, Patrick DS, et al. Cytology of peritoneal
              7.  Kriplani AK, Kapur BML. Laparoscopy for the preoperative staging   lavage performed during staging laparoscopy for gastrointestinal
                and assessment of operability in gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc   malignancies: Is It Useful?*. Ann Surg 1998;228(6):728–733. DOI:
                1991;37(4):441–443. DOI: 10.1016/S0016-5107(91)70776-1.  10.1097/00000658-199812000-00002.














            120   World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, Volume 11 Issue 3 (September–December 2018)
   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17