Page 29 - Peer Reviewed Laparoscopic Jornal
P. 29

WJOLS



                                 A Review of Randomized Controlled Trials comparing Single Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

          conventional cholecystectomy in databases such as Google  trials as well as the learning curve within each trial group.
          Scholar, Highwire press, and PubMed, and SCOPUS     A decline in operating time of about 21 minutes was
          between 1st January 2009 and 20th February 2013 was made  observed between the first five single port laparoscopy
          using search terms, such as single incision laparoscopic  procedures and the last five procedures, more so, two
          cholecystectomy, single port cholecystectomy, and   surgeons with more than 15 years experience in advanced
          minimally invasive cholecystectomy. Other synonyms were  laparoscopic surgery and transanal endoscopic microsurgery
                                                                                      16
          included in the search, such as transumbilical laparoscopic  performed all the procedures.  Other studies showed mean
          cholecystectomy, nearly scarless cholecystectomy and  operating times for conventional laparoscopic chole-
          laparoendoscopic single site cholecystectomy, NOTUS  cystectomy that were marginally statistically significant
                                                                      27
                                                                                26
          cholecystectomy. These studies must compare conventional  (p = 0.03),  p = 0.05.  Phillips et al demonstrated a highly
          laparoscopic cholecystectomy, or its synonyms, such as  statistically significant difference in the mean operating time
          traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy and Four-port  in a multicenter study involving 10 centers which enrolled
          laparoscopic cholecystectomy.                       a large number of participating patients.

          Inclusion Criteria                                  Postoperative Pain
          •  Articles published in English.                   The reduction in postoperative pain is a one of the benefits
          •  Publications between 1st January 2009 and 20th   of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
             February 2013.                                   Conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy involves about
          •  Randomized controlled trials.                    three to four multiple incision, rather than one umbilical
          •  The patients are adults aged 18 years up to 90 years old.  incision used in single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
          •  The articles must evaluate any of the following criteria,  Other factors that may cause postoperative pain include
             operating time, postoperative pain and cosmesis, and  irritation of the peritoneum under the diaphragm by the
             bile duct injury and postoperative wound infection and  carbon dioxide used in creating the pneumoperitoneum, and
             conversion.

          Exclusion Criteria

          Randomization with bias or Quasi randomization. Eleven
          randomized controlled trials were found, but one study was
          excluded because the randomization was biased, hence,
          10 studies were considered.

          DISCUSSION

          Operating Time
          Operating time is an important consideration because it
          offers some idea about the difficulty of a surgical procedure.  Fig. 1: Laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy 23
          Single incision cholecystectomy is associated with crossing
          of instrument intracorporeally as well as the ends of trocars
          and handles of the hand instruments impeding the
          extracorporeal instrumentation. It depicts the time from the
          first incision on the patient to the closure of the last incision
          on the patient. There were no differences in the mean
          operation time in two studies (Figs 1 and 2), 23,24  similarity
          in the operating time noted in these results may be as a
          result of the similarity in the instruments used which are
          the chip on tip flexible telescope and the articulated
          instruments. While the mean operating time for conventional
          laparoscopic cholecystectomy was shorter and statistically
                                        16
                              25
          significant (p  = 0.003,  p = 0.001  and p = 0.00001). 26
          These variations may be partly explained by the differences
          in the level of skill of different surgeons’ involved in the  Fig. 2: Conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy 23
          World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, May-August 2013;6(2):93-97                                 95
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34