Page 22 - Peer Reviewed Laparoscopic Jornal
P. 22

WJOLS

          10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1187
           REVIEW ARTICLE        Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence after Minimal Invasive Hysterectomy: Laparoscopic Surgical Techniques
          Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence after Minimal Invasive

          Hysterectomy: Laparoscopic Surgical Techniques


          Raquel Maciel, Tânia Freitas


          ABSTRACT                                               Despite the difficulty just described, it is reported that

          Vaginal cuff dehiscence (VCD) after hysterectomy is an adverse  the incidence of VCD after total laparoscopic hysterectomy
          event with potential severe morbidity. Although the data are  (TLH) varies between 0.3 and 3.1%. 3-10  This is higher
          limited, minimally invasive approaches to hysterectomy, such  compared with the abdominal (AH) and vaginal (VH)
          as total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), may be associated          1,3
          with a higher risk of vaginal cuff dehiscence. The cause for these  approach (0.1–0.3%).  Currently, 50% of the cases of VCD
          dehiscences is unknown, and multiple factors may be involved.  that have been reported in the literature occurred after TLH
          Internationally, the etiology of VCD is still a matter of concern.  or robotic hysterectomy.
          Either in its technique (TLH) as in the used technology  After abdominal total hysterectomy, the vaginal cuff can
          (electrosurgical colpotomy and/or suturing method), an
          explanation could be found for the higher incidence of VCD.  be sutured closed or left open. In the open technique, the
             This study aims to review laparoscopic surgical techniques  edges of the vaginal cuff seal gradually via granulation.
          in the minimal invasive hysterectomy and its association  It does not appear that either technique is superior for
          with VCD.
                                                              preventing cuff dehiscence. 5,12
          Keywords:  Vaginal cuff dehiscence, Total laparoscopic  In several studies, the vaginal route suturing of vault
          hysterectomy, Vaginal cuff laparoscopic suture methods,
          Electrosurgical colpotomy.                          approach, in the total laparoscopic hysterectomy, is described
                                                                                                10
                                                              to reduce the incidence of VCD (0.18%).  However, other
          How to cite this article: Maciel R, Freitas T. Vaginal Cuff
          Dehiscence after Minimal Invasive Hysterectomy: Laparoscopic  parameters must be considered are as follows:
          Surgical Techniques. World J Laparosc Surg 2013;6(2):81-85.  1. In TLH, vaginal vault closure by laparoscopic route
                                                                 requires statistically significant less time for completion
          Source of support: Nil
                                                                 as compared to vaginal route.
          Conflict of interest: None declared
                                                              2. Postoperative complications, like vault infection and
          INTRODUCTION                                           pain, are suggested to be significantly lower in the
                                                                 laparoscopic route as compared to vaginal route suturing
          Vaginal cuff dehiscence (VCD) after hysterectomy is an  for vault closure.
          adverse event with potential severe morbidity.      3. The mean postoperative vaginal length was significantly
             VCD had complicated gynecologic surgery long before  more in the laparoscopic closure than in the vaginal route
          the advent of laparoscopic approach to hysterectomy. In  suturing of vault approach.  Given the fact that
                                                                                          12
          older reviews of vaginal evisceration, most cases that were  transvaginal closure can not always be accomplished in
          reported in the literature had occurred after vaginal  all women, alternatives to this suturing method should
                           1
          hysterectomy (63%).  However, the distribution of reported  be studied.
          cases has changed significantly over the past 5 years. 2  Since, the continuous increment in the number of
             The reported incidence of VCD following hysterectomy
                                        3-5
          is, nowadays, approximately 0.24%.  In a large case series,  hysterectomies performed laparoscopically, the etiology of
          there were 28 cases of VCD among 11,606 patients    VCD and explanations for its association with TLH have
                                              5
          (0.24%) who underwent total hysterectomy.  The incidence  been subjected to research. Patient characteristics, such as
          of VCD after any type of pelvic surgery is 0.03% and varies  smoking, diabetes, advanced age, radiation therapy and
          by surgical approach. 6                             chronic steroid administration, next to precipitating factors,
             However, the true incidence of VCD after hysterectomy  such as sexual intercourse, postoperative cuff infection and/
          is unknown since:                                   or hematoma and increased abdominal pressure (e.g.
          1. The complication is likely under-reported.       coughing, vomiting and straining at toilet) have been
          2. Patients with cuff dehiscences may present to a different  addressed with regard to their association with VCD. 4-6,13
             physician or hospital than for the initial hysterectomy,  Nevertheless, none of these factors are unique for TLH.
             making data collection difficult and                Because studies have pointed to the possibility of
          3. Case reports of VCD generally do not include for  increased risk of dehiscence with minimally invasive
             comparison in the number of hysterectomies that were  techniques, some potential differences in surgical technique
             not associated with this complication. 7         that could contribute to this problem have been studied. 3,7
          World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, May-August 2013;6(2):81-85                                 81
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27