Page 28 - Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery

Shaukat Jeelani et al.

respectively. In our series postoperative stay was com- 9. Hagood PG, Mehan DJ, Worischeck JH, et al. Laparoscopic
parable to other available series in the literature. It was varicocelectomy: preliminary report of a new technique. J
observed that patients who were from city or nearby Urol Jan1992;147:73-76.
areas happily accepted early discharge from the hos- 10. Al-Shareef ZH, Koneru SR, Al-Tayeb A, Shehata ZM, Aly
TF, Basyouni A. Laparoscopic ligation of varicoceles: an
pital, whereas some patients from far-flung areas were anatomically superior operation. Annals of the Royal College
mentally unprepared to get their discharge early. It was of Surgeons of England. 1993 Sep;75(5):345-348.
experienced that there was a need to motivate and tell 11. Jiménez AG, de la Torre García MV, de Badajoz Sánchez E. A
patients about the real benefits of laparoscopic varico- decade of laparoscopic varicocelectomy: costs and learning
celectomy including early discharge from the hospital. stages. Archivos espanoles de urologia. 1999 Apr;52(3):245-
248.
12. Matsuda T, Horii Y, Higashi S, Oishi K, Takeuchi H, Yoshida
CONCLUSION O. Laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a simple technique for clip
ligation of the spermatic vessels. The Journal of urology. 1992
In our study of 100 patients, it was observed that the Mar 1;147(3):636-638.
results of laparoscopic varicocelectomy were comparable 13. Shamsa A, Mohammadi L, Abolbashari M, Shakeri MT,
to open technique with minimum morbidity, shorter Shamsa S. Comparison of open and laparoscopic varicoce-
hospital stay and with the advantage of treating bilateral lectomies in terms of operative time, sperm parameters, and
varicoceles without any additional incisions. Also, lapa- complications. Urology journal. 2009 Aug 20;6(3):170-175.
roscopic varicocelectomy produces better overall patient 14. Watanabe M, Nagai A, Kusumi N, Tsuboi H, Nasu Y, Kumon
satisfaction and hence can be considered as a preferred H. Minimal invasiveness and effectivity of subinguinal
microscopic varicocelectomy: a comparative study with ret-
surgical technique although sperm analysis results were roperitoneal high and laparoscopic approaches. International
the same in both methods. journal of urology. 2005 Oct;12(10):892-898.
15. Kočvara R, DvočÁček J, SedlÁček J, DÍT˘ E ZE, NOVÁK KE.
REFERENCES Lymphatic sparing laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a micro-
surgical repair. The Journal of urology. 2005 May;173(5):1751-
1. Choi WS, Kim SW. Current issues in varicocele management: 1754.
a review. World J Mens Health. 2013 Apr;31(1):12-20. 16. Al-Kandari AM, Shabaan H, Ibrahim HM, Elshebiny YH,
2. Clarke BG. Incidence of varicocele in normal men and among Shokeir AA. Comparison of outcomes of different varico-
men of different ages. JAMA. 1966 Dec 5;198(10):1121-1122. celectomy techniques: open inguinal, laparoscopic, and
3. Gorelick JI, Goldstein M. Loss of fertility in men with vari- subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy: a randomized
cocele. Fertil Steril. March 1993;59:613-616. clinical trial. Urology. 2007 Mar 1;69(3):417-420.
4. Alsaikhan B, Alrabeeah K, Delouya G, Zini A. Epidemiology 17. Osman T, El-Shourbagy A, Moustafa H, Maged W. Laparo-
of varicocele. Asian journal of andrology. 2016 Mar;18(2): scopic versus Open Retroperitoneal Bilateral Varix Ligation
179-181. for Obese Patients Presenting with Primary Sub-Fertility: A
5. Dubin L, Amelar RD. Varicocele. Urol Clin North Am. Randomized Comparative Study. African Journal of Urology.
1978;5:563-572. 2004;10(1):50-57.
6. Hargreave TB. Varicocele: A clinical enigma. Br J Urol. 1993 18. Podkamenev VV, Stalmakhovich VN, Urkov PS, Solovjev
Oct;72(4):401-408. AA, Iljin VP. Laparoscopic surgery for pediatric varicoceles:
7. Bebars GA, et al. Laparoscopic versus open high ligation of randomized controlled trial. Journal of pediatric surgery.
the testicular veins for the treatment of varicocele. JSLS. 2000 2002 May 1;37(5):727-729.
Jul-Sep; 4(3): 209-213 19. Ogura K, Matsuda T, Terachi T, Horii Y, Takeuchi H, Yoshida
8. Lynch W J, Badenoch D F and Mcanena O J Comparison of O. Laparoscopic varicocelectomy: invasiveness and effective-
Laparoscopic and open ligation of the testicular veins. British ness compared with conventional open retroperitoneal high
Journal of Urology dec 1993;72:796-798. ligation. International Journal of Urology. 1994 Mar;1(1):62-66.

80