Page 22 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 22

Role of Hysterolaparoscopy in Evaluation of Subfertility
            Table 3: Abnormal hysteroscopic findings           the gold standard technique in evaluating tubal and peritoneal
                  Abnormalities detected  Primary infertility  Secondary infertility  pathology, as these can be missed easily on ultrasound. It also
             Sl. no.  in hysteroscopy  (n = 67)    (n = 35)    plays an important role in predicting future pregnancy outcomes
                                                               in many infertile women. 7
             1    Septum             5 (7.5%)      1 (2.8%)
                                                                  The present study showed ovarian pathology to be the most
             2    Myoma              3 (4.5%)      2 (5.7%)    common one detected by hysterolaparoscopy in women with
                                                                                                          8,9
             3    Polyp              9 (13.4%)     4 (11.4%)   primary infertility, similar to the previous literature.  In the
                                                               secondary-infertility group, tubal, uterine, and ovarian pathology
             4    Bicornuate uterus   1 (1.5%)       0
                                                               were almost in similar distribution. Tubal pathology was found to
             5    Synechiae             0          4 (11.4%)   be about 28.4 and 54.3% in both groups, and pelvic peritoneal
             6    Deep-seated ostia  3 (4.5%)      1 (2.8%)    pathology in about 11.9 and 31.4%, these pathologies could
                                                               solely be detected by laparoscopy, and the following corrective
             7    Periosteal adhesions  3 (4.5%)     0
                                                               measures were taken in the same setting. Without the help of these
                                                               endoscopic surgeries, this class of pathologies causing subfertility
            Table 4: Laparoscopic abnormalities                would be missed.
                                                                  Major hysteroscopic abnormalities in the present study
                  Abnormalities detected  Primary infertility Secondary infertility  were polyp followed by septate uterus, myoma, periosteal
             Sl. no.  in hysteroscopy  (n = 67)    (n = 35)
                                                               adhesions, and deep-seated Ostia in primary infertility, whereas
             1    Myoma              9 (13.4%)     3 (8.6%)    among the secondary infertility group, polyp and synechiae
             2    Endometriosis     15 (22.3%)    12 (34.3%)   were the most common causes. This finding is consistent with
                                                               the findings of other studies. 10,11  PCOS and endometriosis were
             3    Adhesions          1 (1.5%)      4 (11.3%)
                                                               major abnormalities found on laparoscopy in both the groups.
             4    Hydrosalpinx       1 (1.5%)      3 (8.6%)    The incidence of tubal blockage was high in the secondary
             5    Ovarian cyst       7 (10.5%)     3 (8.6%)    subfertility group.
                                                                  The goal of endoscopic surgeries is to restore the anatomy as
             6    PCOD              39 (58.2%)    12 (34.3%)
                                                               far as possible. The major advantage of these endoscopic surgeries
             7    Uterine anomaly    1 (1.5%)        0         is that they follow the principles of microsurgery. “Microsurgery”
                                                               is a set of principles developed to improve fertility surgery
                                                               outcomes. Laparoscopy and hysteroscopy are the cornerstones of
            Table 5: Chromopertubation
                                                               reproductive microsurgery with fertility outcome as the endpoint.
                                   Primary    Secondary        Postoperative adhesions are the key cause of failure of fertility-
             Sl.                   infertility    infertility    Total   enhancing surgeries, laparoscopy primarily addresses this issue
             no.  Chromopertubation  (n = 67)  (n = 35)  (n = 102)
                                                               with its ability to reduce postoperative adhesions to minimum by
             1    B/L spill       49 (73.1%)  19 (54.3%)  68   following microsurgical principles.
             2    Unilateral spill  16 (23.9%)  12 (34.3%)  28
             3    No spill         2 (2.9%)   4 (11.4%)  6     conclusIon
                  Total              67        35       102    Combined hysterolaparoscopy is a safe, effective, and reliable tool
                                                               in comprehensive evaluation of infertility. Correctable structural
                                                               abnormalities in the pelvis may be unfortunately missed by routine
            hydrosalpinx. The ovarian cyst was found in 10.5% of primary   pelvic examination and imaging procedures that can be detected by
            infertility, out of which 2 were dermoid cysts. Three patients with   hysterolaparoscopy. Reversible causes such as adnexal adhesions,
            secondary infertility had ovarian cysts (Table 4).  tubal blockade, uterine synechiae, etc., can easily be diagnosed
               On chromopertubation, there was no spillage in 2.9% of primary   and treated by hysterolaparoscopy in the same sitting. It should
            and 11.4% of secondary infertile women. Unilateral spillage of   be considered as a definitive day-care procedure for evaluation
            dye was found in 23.9 and 34.3% of women in the primary and   and treatment of female infertility. Fertility-enhancing endoscopic
            secondary groups, respectively, the rest of them had free bilateral   procedures can be performed easily as there is minimal handling of
            spillage of dye (Table 5).                         pelvic organs due to better application of microsurgical principles
               Pathologies warranting simultaneous surgical procedures were   and very limited side effects.
            identified. Necessary surgical interventions were carried out either
            by laparoscopy or by hysteroscopy, namely adhesiolysis, ovarian   orcId
            drilling, ovarian cystectomy, myomectomy, removal of subserous
            fibroid, fulguration of endometriotic spots, salpingostomy, and   Soumya Rajshekar Patil   https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8092-8703
            polypectomy.
                                                               references
            dIscussIon                                           1.  “WHO Infertility”. Who.int. 2013-03-19. Retrieved 2013-06-17.
                                                                 2.   World Health Organization. Infecundity, infertility, and childlessness
            Perspectives of evaluating infertile women have changed recently
            due to developments in gynecological endoscopy. Current   in developing countries. DHS Comparative Reports No 9. Calverton,
                                                                    Maryland, USA: ORC Macro and the World Health Organization; 2004.
            approach to infertility is no longer based on diagnosing an exact     3.  Acholonu, Uchenna C, et al. Hysterosalpingography versus sonohyster-
            etiology. The investigation of infertile couples should be rapid   ography for intrauterine abnormalities. JSLS 2011;15(4):471–474.
                                                6
            and inexpensive, using minimally invasive tests.  Laparoscopy is   DOI: 10.4293/108680811X13176785203923.
            118   World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, Volume 15 Issue 2 (May–August 2022)
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27