Page 88 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery

A Prospective Observational Study on Single-incision or Conventional Three-port Laparoscopic TEP Inguinal Hernia Repair
versus conventional laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: A 4. Hernias G. Surgical-tutor.org website. Available from: http://www.
matched comparison” concluded that the cost of SILS TEP using surgical-tutor.org.uk/specialities/general/hernias.htm [Accessed
conventional laparoscopic instruments in a resource-poor and cost- May 13, 2008].
sensitive country like India was not statistically different from the 5. Wantz GE. Abdominal wall hernias. In: Schwartz SI, editor. Principles
of Surgery. 7th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1999. p. 1585–1611.
conventional group without compromising the safety of the patient. 6. Read RC. The contributions of Usher and others to the elimination of
tension from groin herniorrhaphy. Hernia 2005;9(3):208–211. DOI: 10.1007/
s10029-005-0322-1.
conclusIon 7. Neumayer L, McGregor DB, Mann B. Abdominal wall, including
The outcome of inguinal hernias using laparoscopic modality is hernia. In: Lawrence PF, editor. Essentials of general surgery. 4th ed.
associated with good results in both techniques. SILS TEP inguinal Baltimore, MD: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2006. p. 225–237.
hernia repair using conventional laparoscopic instruments is a safe 8. Wijerathne S, Agarwal N, Ramzi A, et al. Single-port versus
and feasible alternative to CTEP in experienced hands. The outcomes conventional laparoscopic total extra-peritoneal inguinal hernia
of SILS TEP for operation time, postoperative complication, duration repair: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Surg
Endosc 2016;30(4):1356–1363. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4378-4.
of stay, time until return to normal nonstrenuous activity, and 9. Choi BJ, Jeong WJ, Lee IK, et al. Single-port versus conventional three-
conversion to open are comparable to CTEP. port laparoscopic totally extra peritoneal inguinal hernia repair: a
However, the approach provided advantage in terms of randomized controlled trial. Hernia 2016;20(6):789–795. DOI: 10.1007/
cosmesis and postoperative pain using VAS score. s10029-016-1499-1.
10. Kim JH, Park SM, Kim JJ, et al. Initial experience of single port
laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair: nearly-scarless
orcId inguinal hernia repair. J Korean Surg Soc 2011;81(5):339–343. DOI:
10.4174/jkss.2011.81.5.339.
Yaser Hussain Wani https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5249-2164 11. Tai HC, Lin CD, Chung SD, et al. A comparative study of standard versus
Safoora Wani https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3186-4413 laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) totally extraperitoneal
(TEP) inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 2011;25(9):2879–2883. DOI:
10.1007/s00464-011-1636-y.
references 12. Wijerathne S, Agarwal N, Ramzy A, et al. A prospective randomized
1. Liu N, Greenberg JA, Brooks DC. Chapter 11: inguinal hernia. In: controlled trial to compare single-port endo-laparoscopic surgery
Maingot’s abdominal operations. 13th ed. McGraw Hill Education; versus conventional TEP inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc
2019. p. 193. 2014;28(11):3053–3058. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3578-7.
2. Malangoni MA, Rosen MJ. Hernias. In: Sabiston textbook of surgery: the 13. Rajapandian S, Bushan C, Sabnis SC, et al. Single incision multiport
biological basis of modern surgical. 20th ed. Elsevier; 2008. p. 1092–1093. versus conventional laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a matched
3. Kingsnorth A, LeBlanc K. Hernias: inguinal and incisional. Lancet comparison. J Minim Acess Surg 2018;14(1):44–51. DOI: 10.4103/
2003;362(9395):1561–1571. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14746-0. jmas.JMAS_30_17: 10.4103/jmas_30_17.

86 World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, Volume 15 Issue 1 (January–April 2022)