Page 87 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 87

A Prospective Observational Study on Single-incision or Conventional Three-port Laparoscopic TEP Inguinal Hernia Repair























            Figs 17A and B: Postoperative scar at (A) 1 week; (B) 2 months


                           8
               Wijerathne et al.  reported that postoperative seroma was the   VAS score at 6 hours in CTEP was 2.6 ± 1.3 and in the SILS TEP group
            most common complication in both methods. All patients with   2.1 ± 1.5. VAS score at 24 hours was 2.1 ± 1.5 in the CTEP group and
            seroma were managed conservatively without any intervention.   SILS TEP group 1.5 ± 1.5. At 6 hours, p-value = 0.146 and 0.067 at
            Postoperative seroma developed in 17% of cases undergoing CTEP   24 hours after surgery; hence the difference between CTEP and
            and 8% of cases undergoing SILS TEP.               SILS TEP was not statistically significant.
               Thus our results are consistent with the above-given studies.  The observation made in our study favored SILS TEP to be less
                                                               painful than CTEP, however, statistically insignificant. The findings
            Hospital Stay                                      were consistent with the observation made by Wijerathne et al.
            Orals were started as soon as postoperative nausea was over and   when VAS is compared at 6 and 24 hours.
            the patient felt hungry. Patients in both groups were advised early
            ambulation. As the patients became ambulant, tolerated orals,   Cosmesis
            and voided urine, they were discharged. The mean postoperative   The cosmetic outcome of the patients was compared after 1 month
            hospital stay in CTEP repair was 19.2 hours and in SILS TEP repair   of surgery. Cosmetic results were graded subjectively 1 month
            21.8 hours; (p-value of 0.97—statistically insignificant).  postoperatively using the following range of choices: 5 (very
                           8
               Wijerathne et al.  reported the mean hospital stay of 19.7 hours   satisfied), 4 (satisfied), 3 (acceptable), 2 (dissatisfied), and 1 (very
            in CTEP group and in SILS TEP group, it was 20.5 hours.  dissatisfied) (Fig. 17). The mean cosmetic result was 3.9 ± 0.8 in the
               Lomanto et al. reported in their study that the mean hospital   CTEP group and 4.1 ± 0.9 in the SILS TEP group. The p-value = 0.14
            stay for CTEP was 19.7 hours and for SILS TEP, it was 22.1 hours.  which is statistically insignificant.
                                                                          11
            Time Until Return to Normal Daily Work                Tai et  al.  observe that the cosmetic outcome graded
            In our study, the average time to resume normal nonstrenuous   objectively by the patient was 3.9 ± 0.7 and 4.1 ± 0.8 in CTEP and
                                                               SILS TEP groups, respectively. The p-value = 0.14 which is statistically
            work was 3.7 ± 0.8 days in CTEP repair and 3.3 ± 1.2 days in SILS   insignificant.
            TEP repair. Thus CTEP group had the almost same time to resume   Thus concerning cosmetic outcomes, our results are consistent
            normal work as the SILS TEP group.                 with the above study.
                     11
               Tai et al.  observed that patients operated by CTEP repair
            and SILS TEP repair return to normal work after a mean of 3.8 and   Conversion to Open
            3.4 days which was statistically nonsignificant.   In our study of 30 patients with inguinal hernia undergoing CTEP/
               Thus our observations were consistent with the results of other   SILS TEP, there was no conversion to open technique.
            studies.                                              Choi et al.  in his study “Single-port versus conventional three-
                                                                          9
                                                               port laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair:
            Postoperative Pain                                 a randomized controlled trial” had no conversion to the open
            The postoperative pain was calculated using a VAS score. VAS     technique.
            score was almost the same in CTEP and SILS TEP procedures.
            VAS score was calculated at 6 and 24 hours after surgery. The   Cost
            mean VAS score at 6 hours in the CTEP group was 3.1 ± 2.8 and   In our study, the cost in the SILS TEP group, using routine
            in the SILS TEP group 2.8 ± 0.8. VAS score at 24 hours was 2 ± 1   laparoscopic instruments was not statistically different from the
            and 1.2 ± 1.1 for CTEP group and SILS TEP group, respectively. At     CTEP group without compromising patient safety. However,
            6 hours, p-value = 0.5 and 0.32 at 24 hours after surgery.  the actual cost for SILS TEP when using specialized articulating
                           8
               Wijerathne et al.  concluded that pain score (VAS) at 6 hours,   instruments is significantly higher.
            24 hours, 1 week, 4 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery   Observation made in our study was consistent with the
                                                                                     13
            was slightly higher in the CTEP group compared to SILS TEP group.   study by Rajapandian et al.,  who in their study “single incision
                                                       World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, Volume 15 Issue 1 (January–April 2022)  85
   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92