Page 37 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 37

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
            A Study of Clinical Profile and Outcome of Open Mesh Repair

            vs Laparoscopic Mesh Repair of Umbilical Hernia in Public

            Sector Hospital


                        1
                                    2
            Aeiman Saniya , Manikanta KS , Mir Md Noorul Hassan 3
             AbstrAct
             Background: When a viscus or part of a viscus protrudes through the umbilicus, it is known as umbilical hernia. These hernias constitute as one
             of the common hernias of adults. Umbilical hernias are common in individuals with increased intra-abdominal pressure such as obesity, ascites,
             or chronic abdominal distension including malignancy. Mesh repair in umbilical hernia can be open mesh repair or laparoscopic mesh repair
             with each having their own advantages and disadvantages. This study attempts to evaluate various operative procedures and postoperative
             results of umbilical hernia in public sector hospital.
             Methods: Study was an interventional study with a total sample size of 80. Study population were all the patients admitted with umbilical
             hernia to the surgical wards of hospitals associated with Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute. The study was conducted from
             November 2018 to May 2020. After admission, patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were enrolled into the study and informed written consent
             was obtained. All the details and investigations of each patient were recorded in the case record form at the baseline visit. In 40 patients, open
             mesh repair of umbilical hernia was done, and in another 40 patients, laparoscopic mesh repair of umbilical hernia was done. The duration of
             surgery and various other postoperative complications were recorded.
             Results: Eighty cases of umbilical hernia were operated, out of which, in 40 patients, open mesh repair was done and, in another 40 patients,
             laparoscopic mesh repair was done. Thirty-six of 40 patients were females, and 4 of 40 patients were males in the laparoscopic mesh group.
             Thirty-two of 40 patients were females, and 8 of 40 patients were males who underwent open mesh repair. Mean age was 45.0 years, and mean
             operating time was 64.75 minutes for open mesh repair group, whereas mean age was 42.37 years and mean operating time was 50.38 minutes
             for laparoscopic mesh repair group. Operating time showed statistical significance.
             Conclusion: Laparoscopic mesh repair of umbilical hernia is becoming the procedure of choice in public sector hospitals in terms of decrease
             operating time, early recovery, less pain and less complications in postoperative period, and reduced duration of hospital stay as compared to
             open mesh repair of umbilical hernia.
             Keywords: Laparoscopic mesh repair, Open mesh repair, Umbilical hernia.
             World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery (2022): 10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1501



            IntroductIon                                       1–3 Department of  General Surgery, Bangalore Medical College and
            In Latin, the word hernia means rupture. An abnormal protrusion   Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
            of an organ or tissue through a defect in its surrounding walls   Corresponding  Author: Manikanta KS, Department of  General
            defines hernia. When a viscus or part of a viscus protrudes through   Surgery, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru,
            the umbilicus, it is known as umbilical hernia. It is a full thickness   Karnataka, India, e-mail: dr.manisurg@gmail.com
            protrusion of the umbilicus with an underlying fascial defect and   How to cite this article: Saniya A, Manikanta KS, Hassan MMN. A Study
            may contain peritoneal fluid, preperitoneal fat, intestine, or omentum   of Clinical Profile and Outcome of Open Mesh Repair vs Laparoscopic
            as the content. 1                                  Mesh Repair of Umbilical Hernia in Public Sector Hospital. World J Lap
               Umbilical hernia in infants is common and congenital, whereas   Surg 2022;15(1):35–39.
            in adults, it is largely acquired. Umbilical hernia is commonly seen   Source of support: Nil
            in females and in patients with conditions that result in increased   Conflict of interest: None
            intra-abdominal pressure such as obesity, pregnancy, ascites, or
                                   2
            chronic abdominal distension.
               The physical examination or ultrasound has identified up to 50%   for surgery are incarcerated hernia requiring reduction, strangulated
                                                      3
            of all individuals having fascial defect of umbilical ring.  Patients   hernia,  perforation,  and  evisceration.  The  persistence  and
                                                                                                               5
            with umbilical hernia usually present as a soft bulge located anterior   appearance of hernia are relative indications for operative repair.
                                 4
            or adjacent to the umbilicus.                         This study is done to estimate the prevalence, clinical findings,
               Umbilical hernia is the second commonest type of hernia. The   and risk factors associated with the umbilical hernia in adults and also
            surgical management of umbilical hernia has developed over the   compare the operative techniques of umbilical hernia repair. This
            years, and umbilical hernia can be treated by anatomical repair, open   study also compares the postoperative outcomes of the umbilical
            mesh repair, or laparoscopic mesh repair. The absolute indications   hernia repair by open mesh repair and laparoscopic mesh repair.



            © The Author(s). 2022 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.
            org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to
            the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain
            Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42