Page 16 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 16

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
            A Comparative Study of Extracorporeal Knotting vs Clips for

            Ligating Cystic Duct in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy


                              1
                                              2
            Hebbatam Vishnu Teja , Deepak R Chavan , Girish Kullolli 3
             AbstrAct
             The aims of present study were as following: To compare extracorporeal knotting vs clips for ligating cystic duct in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
             in terms of feasibility operative time (incision to closer) based on types of cholecystitis postoperative pain, operative cost, and associated
             morbidities like gallbladder perforation, bile leak, liver bed injury, port site infection, migration of clips, and slipping of knot.
             Methodology: All the patients were assigned by randomization into either of two groups: study group—patients in whom extracorporeal
             knotting was done for ligation of cystic duct, and control group—patients in whom clips were used for clipping of cystic duct. Period of study
             was from November 2018 to June 2020.
             Results: This was a case series analysis conducted from November 2018 to June 2020; i.e., for a period of 20 months, 60 cases were subjected
             to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In the control group, 11 patients had intraoperative complications, and no complications in the study group.
             In the study group, mean time taken for the operation was 67.37 minutes when compared to control group of 61.83 minutes. The cost of the
             suture material used in study group was 302 rupees, and the average cost of the titanium clips used in control group was 500 rupees.
             Conclusion: In laparoscopic cholecystectomy, extracorporeal knotting has the advantages over clipping of cystic duct in operative cost and
             lesser intraoperative complications with the only limitation being operative time.
             Keywords: Clipping, Cystic duct, Extracorporeal knotting, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
             World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery (2022): 10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1494


            IntroductIon                                       1 Department of General Surgery, Rural Development Trust Hospital,
                                                            1
            Cholecystectomy is the common operation of the biliary system.    Bathalapalle, Andhra Pradesh, India
            In cholecystectomy, cystic duct is ligated with the sutures or clips.   2 Department of General Surgery, BLDE (Deemed to be University), Shri
            The conception of laparoscopy has revolutionized the art of surgery   BM Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Vijayapura,
            due to its advantages over open technique. The lately innovated   Karnataka, India
            laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been drastically refined over the   Corresponding Author:  Deepak  R Chavan,  Department  of  General
            years by better exploration of ergonomics, new energy sources,   Surgery, BLDE (Deemed to be University), Shri BM Patil Medical College
                          2
            and endo suturing.  The conventional four-port access technique   Hospital and Research Centre, Vijayapura, Karnataka, India
            has been modified to three ports, two ports, and single incision   How to cite this article: Teja HV, Chavan DR, Kullolli G. A Comparative
            laparoscopic surgery. Cystic duct ligation methods using metallic   Study of Extracorporeal Knotting vs Clips for Ligating Cystic Duct in
            clips, harmonic scalpel, plasma kinetic, and intracorporeal and   Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. World J Lap Surg 2022;15(1):14–17.
            extracorporeal suturing techniques have been tried with gratifying   Source of support: Nil
            results. 3–8  Open cholecystectomy is replaced by the gold standard
            procedure, i.e., laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of   Conflict of interest: None
            gallbladder diseases.
               Using clips will reduce the intraoperative time which has   (incision to closer) based on types of cholecystitis, postoperative
            advantage over the extracorporeal knotting, whereas clips have   pain, operative cost, and associated morbidities like gallbladder
            the drawback of slippage, resulting in leakage or hemorrhage,   perforation, bile leak, liver bed injury, port site infection, migration
            and there are situations such as wide cystic duct where clipping   of clips, and slipping of knot.
            is difficult; in such cases, using the extracorporeal knotting for
            occluding the cystic duct is best alternative. Extracorporeal knotting   methodology
            with absorbable suture material is feasible, practical, economic,
            and safe as well.                                  This was a case series analysis done in patients who underwent
               In 5–10% of the cases, there are chances of conversion to open   laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Department of Surgery at a
            cholecystectomy from laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  tertiary hospital in North Karnataka.
                                                                  All the patients were grouped into study group and control
                                                               group based on computerized random number tables: Study
            AIms And objectIve of study                        group—patients in whom extracorporeal knotting was done for
            The aims of present study were as following: To compare   ligation of cystic duct. Control group—patients in whom clips were
            extracorporeal knotting vs clips for ligating cystic duct in   used for clipping of cystic duct. Period of study was from November
            laparoscopic cholecystectomy in terms of feasibility, operative time   2018 to June 2020.


            © The Author(s). 2022 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.
            org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to
            the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain
            Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21