Page 15 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 15

Peroperative Scoring System for Difficult Lap Cholecystectomy
            difficult anatomy in an extreme degree of complex cholecystectomy   references
            is the reason for conversion to open. 15,16  Difficult cholecystectomy
            is judged by a few peroperative scoring systems with some amount     1.  Murphy JB. The diagnosis of gallstones. Am Med News 1903:
                                                                    825–833.
            of accuracy. 17                                      2.  Litynski GS. Erich Mühe and the rejection of laparoscopic
               Recently acute cholecystitis is operated by laparoscopic   cholecystectomy (1985): a surgeon ahead of his time. Journal of the
            method within 48 hours with the increasing trend rather than   Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 1998;2(4):341–346. PMID:
            interval cholecystectomy. So, to make the decision for conversion   10036125.
            to open surgery intraoperative scoring system will provide     3.  Sugrue M, Sahebally SM, Ansaloni L, et al. Grading operative findings
                    18
            indications.  Scoring and evaluating intraoperative findings gives   at laparoscopic cholecystectomy–a new scoring system. World J
            us a standardized protocol to judge the complexity of the disease.   Emerg Surg 2015;10:14. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-015-0005-x.
            Above all, it guides us to convert the procedure to open and good     4.  Solmaz A, Gülçiçek OB, Biricik A, et al. Evaluation of the parameters
                                                                    increasing intraoperative difficulty scores of elective laparoscopic
            outcome measurement with the score.                     cholecystectomy. J Liver Clin Res 2016;3(1):1023.
               In this study chronic calculous cholecystitis has a mean score     5.  Gutt CN, Encke J, Koninger J, et al. Acute cholecystitis: early versus
            of 5 and acute calculous cholecystitis has a mean score of 6, so   delayed cholecystectomy, a multicenter randomized trial (ACDC
            even though acute calculous cholecystitis has more degree of   study, NCT00447304). Ann Surg 2013;258(3):385–393. DOI: 10.1097/
            difficulty according to the scoring system we have managed them   SLA.0b013e3182a1599b.
            laparoscopically without any complications but the time taken to     6.  Takada T, Strasberg SM, Solomkin JS, et  al. TG13: Updated
            complete acute calculous cholecystitis was around 10 minutes   Tokyo Guidelines for the management of acute cholangitis and
            more as compared to chronic calculous cholecystitis.    cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2013;20(1):1–7. DOI: 10.1007/
                                                                    s00534-012-0566-y.
               In this study, 47 (94%) patients have encountered a severe      7.  Committee AT, Adler DG, Conway JD, et al. Biliary and pancreatic
            amount of complexity. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was   stone extraction devices. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;70(4):603–609.
            completed successfully when there was a score of ≤7. It was   DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.06.015.
            converted to open surgery when the score was ≥8. With a score     8.  Pitt HA. Patient value is superior with early surgery for acute
            of eight extreme amount of complexity was faced and our three   cholecystitis. Ann Surg 2014;259:16–17. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.000000
            patients of this score were converted to open surgery.  0000000428.
               So, according to our findings higher the peroperative score,     9.  Gupta N, Ranjan G, Arora MP, et al. Validation of a scoring system
            there might be higher chances of conversion to open surgery, and   to predict difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Int J Surg
                                                                    2013;11(9):1002–1006. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.05.037.
            if the score is ≥8 the chances of successful completion of surgery     10.  Vivek MA, Augustine AJ, Rao R. A comprehensive predictive scoring
            by the laparoscopic method is very low.                 method for difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Minim Access
               None of our cases had any complications like bile duct injury.   Surg 2014;10(2):62–67. DOI: 10.4103/0972-9941.129947.
            So, the scoring system has also guided us in the prevention of      11.  Surati K, Rathod A, Shah AS. Intraoperative assessment of
            life-threatening peroperative complications.            laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 2019.
                                                                 12.  Okamoto S, Nakano K, Kosahara K, et al. Effects of pravastatin and
                                                                    ursodeoxycholic acid on cholesterol and bile acid metabolism in
            conclusIon                                              patients with cholesterol gallstones. J Gastroenterol 1994;29(1):
            This intraoperative scoring system according to peroperative   47–55. DOI: 10.1007/BF01229073.
            finding is important in the evaluation of the mild, moderate, severe,     13.  Lal P, Agarwal PN, Malik VK, et  al. A difficult laparoscopic
            and extreme amount of complexity in carrying out laparoscopic   cholecystectomy that requires conversion to open procedure can be
            cholecystectomy. According to the scoring system, severe and   predicted by peroperative ultrasonography. Journal of the Society
                                                                    of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2002;6(1):59–63. PMID: 12002299.
            extreme categories fall into difficult cholecystectomy. Most of     14.  Khan IA, El-Tinay OE. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute
            the difficult cholecystectomy can be completed laparoscopically   cholecystitis: can peroperative factors predict conversion? Saudi
            while only an extreme degree of peroperative finding has to be   Med J 2004;25(3):299–302. PMID: 15048165.
            converted to open surgery thus the scoring system also provides     15.  Gupta G, Sharma PK, Gupta S, et al. Pre and per operative prediction
            indication for conversion.                              of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy using clinical and
               However, this is a small and single-center study. Further, large   ultrasonographic parameters. Int J Res Med Sci 2015;3(11):
            multicentric study are required.                        3342–3346. DOI: 10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20151188.
                                                                 16.  Peters JH, Krailadsiri W, Incarbone R, et al. Reasons for conversion
                                                                    from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy in an urban
            clInIcAl sIgnIfIcAnce                                   teaching hospital. Am J Surg 1994;168(6):555–558. DOI: 10.1016/
            In mild, moderate, and severe degrees of difficult cholecystectomy   s0002-9610(05)80121-7.
            according to the peroperative scoring system surgery can be     17.  Kwon YJ, Ahn BK, Park HK, et al. What is the optimal time for
            successfully completed laparoscopically without complication. On   laparoscopic cholecystectomy in gallbladder empyema? Surg Endosc
                                                                    2013;27:3776–3780. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-2968-6.
            an extreme level difficult cholecystectomy, peroperative scoring     18.  Pisano M, Ceresoli M, Campanati L, et al. Should We must push
            system can help and provide guidance for conversion to open   for primary surgery attempt in case of acute cholecystitis? A
            surgery and also help in preventing life-threatening complications   retrospective analysis and a proposal of an evidence based clinical
            like bile duct injury.                                  pathway. Emerg Med 2014;4(4):201.









                                                       World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, Volume 15 Issue 1 (January–April 2022)  13
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20