Page 34 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 34

A Comparative Evaluation of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy
            Table 1: Demographic Characteristics               Table 3: Recuperation from surgery
            Variable             LSH (n = 15) TLH (n = 15)  p-value  Variable        LSH (n = 15)  TLH (n = 15)  p-value
            Age (year)           40.3 ± 4.8  44.3 ± 8.1  0.1    Ability to take care of self   7.2 ± 1.2  6.4 ± 1.68  0.14
                    2
            BMI (kg/m )          23.3 ± 3.4  23.5 ± 2.8  0.8    (days)
                                                                Routine activity (days)  15.87 ± 3.13 13.47 ± 2.30 0.02
            Diagnosis (%)
            Fibroid              9 (60)    10 (66.6)            Outdoor activity (days)  27.07 ± 4.6  26.07 ± 3.47 0.50
            AUB                  4 (26.6)   2 (13.3)
            Adenomyosis          2 (13.3)   1 (6.6)  0.8        Urinary dysfunction  0/15      3/15      0.22
            Postmenopausal bleeding  0      1 (6.6)             Bowel dysfunction    0/15      0/15      –
            Submucous polyp      0          1 (6.6)             Resumption of sexual    60.67  65.60     0.06
            Previous caesarean section  5 (33.3)  0  0.042      activity (days)
            (%)                                                Data presented as n and mean ± SD
            Previous major abdominal   3 (20)  3 (20)  1
            surgery (%)                                        difference in the postoperative bladder, bowel, and sexual functions
            Data presented as n and mean ± SD; AUB, abnormal uterine bleeding; BMI,   in both groups. Cochrane review also suggested that supracervical
            body mass index                                    hysterectomy does not improve outcomes for sexual, urinary, or
                                                               bowel function as compared to total hysterectomy. 8
                                                                            9
            Table 2: Perioperative outcome measures in both the groups  Cipullo et al.  did a retrospective cohort study for 7 years and
                                                               reported shorter surgery time in the LSH group (100 min) than TLH
            Variable         LSH (n = 15)  TLH (n = 15)  p-value  group (110 min). Other studies also reported that the operating
            Operative time (mins) 88.6 ± 22.1  86 ± 27.2   0.29  time and blood loss were less in LSH group when compared to TLH
            Blood loss (mL)  256 ± 141.6  210 ± 107.5  0.37    group. 10–12  In the present study, we found that LSH was associated
            Uterine weight (g)  254.4 ± 221.7  254.9 ± 265.2  0.7  with slightly longer operation time and more blood loss compared
            Absolute change    1.73 ± 1.0  1.23 ± 0.5  0.001   to TLH, statistically insignificant. It could be the effect of a learning
            in Hb (g/dL)                                       curve and extra time required for morcellation in LSH group.
                                                                           9
            Intraoperative    0/15       0/15         –           Cipullo et al.  reported a higher incidence of major complication
            complications                                      rates (bladder, bowel, and ureteric injuries) in TLH group than LSH group
            Blood transfusion  3/15      1/15         0.59     (4.5 vs 1.3%). Minor complications, such as wound infection, urinary
            Hospital stay (days)  3 ± 1.4  3.1 ± 2.3  0.4      tract infection, vaginal cuff abscess, and hematoma were comparable
                                                                                                            10
            Postoperative    0/15        1/15         1        in both the groups (TLH: 13.3% and LSH: 13.4%). Einarsson et al.  and
                                                                       11
                                                               Boosz et al.  also reported higher chances of intraoperative (visceral
            complications                                      injuries), and postoperative complications in patients undergoing TLH.
            Readmission      0/15        0/15         –        No intraoperative complications were noted in our study and only one
            VAS day 0        7.8 ± 0.8   8.2 ± 0.6    0.16     patient in TLH group had a wound infection.
            VAS day 1        3.6 ± 0.8   4.4 ± 1.6    0.03        Postoperative pain and analgesic requirement were comparable
            VAS day 7        1.2 ± 0.4   1.3 ± 0.1    0.49     in both the groups in previous studies. 10,13  While, we found
            Injectable analgesics  1.8 ± 0.4  2.0 ± 0.2  0.04  significantly less pain on day 1 of surgery and less need for injectable
            (no. of days)                                      analgesics in LSH group than TLH group.
                                                                           14
            Data presented as n and mean ± SD; Hb, hemoglobin; VAS, visual analog scale  Ozgur et al.  reported a 5.1% readmission rate in TLH group
                                                               and 2.8% in LSH group. While no patient required readmission in
               Two (13.3%) out of fifteen patients in LSH group developed   our study.
                                                                         15
            postoperative spotting per vaginum, managed by low dose oral   Kafy et al.  described improvement in overall health, body and
            contraceptive pills for 3 months.                  self-images, and sexual function in both LSH and TLH groups. Some
               On six month follow-up period, no patient was found to have   studies reported mean time to return to normal activity is earlier
                                                                                             5,6
            vault prolapse.                                    after LSH (2 weeks) than TLH (3 weeks).
                                                                             16
                                                                  Einarsson et al.  documented significantly better improvement
                                                               in the short-term postoperative quality of life in terms of physical
            discussion                                         functioning, role physical, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning,
            Hysterectomy by minimally invasive approach is now preferred as   and physical component summary in LSH group than TLH group.
            it obviates the need for a huge abdominal incision, longer hospital   However, they did not find any difference in return to daily activities,
            stay, longer convalescence time, and associated complications with   perioperative pain, or use of pain medication. On the contrary,
            added advantages of better visualization, faster recovery, less pain,   patients in our study took significantly longer time to return to
            and cosmetically better. We compared two types of laparoscopic   normal activity with LSH group than TLH group and resumption
            hysterectomy.                                      of sexual activity was earlier in LSH group.
                                                                          17
               One of the basic ideas behind performing supracervical   Berlit et al.  published in their article that preservation of the
            hysterectomy was the total hysterectomy might lead to damage   cervix does not have any impact in improving sexual functioning
            pelvic nerves or pelvic supports, which could increase the risk   postoperatively. Both LSH and TLH have a similar improvement in
            of urinary incontinence, bowel dysfunction, and reduces sexual   long-term sexual functioning in women who had impaired sexuality
            pleasure. But in the present study, we did not find any significant   preoperatively.


             32   World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, Volume 14 Issue 1 (January–April 2021)
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39