Page 36 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 36

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
            Simple and Reliable Scoring System to Predict Difficult

            Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Preoperatively


                        1
                                               2
            Pradeep Goyal , Shanmugavel Muthuraman , Saurabh Sharma 3
             AbstrAct
             Aim and objective: To validate the efficacy of proposed scoring system compared to the Randhawa scoring system in prediction of difficult
             laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) preoperatively.
             Materials and methods: A prospective study was conducted including 102 patients who underwent LC for symptomatic cholelithiasis.
             Preoperatively a score was given to the patient according to both scoring systems. Final outcome was decided on intraoperative findings
             of operative time, adhesions, and bile spillage. Univariate and multivariate analyses of preoperative factors were done. Receiver operating
             characteristic (ROC) curves of both the scoring system were compared, and the results were reported as a difference in proportion (95% CI).
             p value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
             Results: The specificity and positive predictive value of the modified scoring system were 92 and 95.1% which was higher than Randhawa
             scoring system, i.e., 76 and 87.5%. Area under ROC curve was also more in modified scoring system. Also, univariate analysis found age >50 years,
             history of hospitalization, previous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, diabetes mellitus, palpable gallbladder, gallbladder wall
             thickness, and contracted gallbladder on ultrasound to be statistically significant factors.
             Conclusion: The proposed modified scoring system significantly increases the specificity and positive predictive value of the Randhawa scoring
             system. This scoring system is easy to perform, require no additional investigation and can effectively categorize patient where LC will be difficult.
             Clinical significance: The proposed scoring system can effectively predict difficult preoperatively which would help in better preoperative
             preparation by the surgical team for a difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients can be optimally counseled preoperatively so that they
             are well prepared for various outcomes of the procedure.
             Keywords: Difficult cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Prediction, Preoperative, Scoring system, Simple.
             World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery (2021): 10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1444



            IntroductIon                                       1–3 Department of General Surgery, Maharishi Markandeshwer Medical
            Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the most common minimal   College and Hospital, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India
            invasive procedure performed by general surgeons around   Corresponding Author: Saurabh Sharma, Department of General
            the globe. Early recovery, shorter hospital stay, and minimal   Surgery, Maharishi Markandeshwer Medical College and Hospital,
            postoperative discomfort after the surgery are among the few   Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India, Phone:  +91 09418173024, e-mail:
            reasons which make this surgery a gold standard treatment for   100rbhs@gmail.com
            symptomatic cholelithiasis. Although the complication rate of LC   How to cite this article: Goyal P, Muthuraman S, Sharma S. Simple
            ranges from 0.1 to 6%, which might look small, the actual number   and Reliable Scoring System to Predict Difficult Laparoscopic
            of complications is both large and is a cause of significant morbidity   Cholecystectomy Preoperatively. World J Lap  Surg 2021;14(1):34–38.
                      1

            to the patient.  Most complications, which are avoidable, are caused   Source of support: Nil
            due to the lack of adequate preparation for a difficult operation.   Conflict of interest: None
            Randhawa et al. proposed a scoring system for preoperative
            prediction of difficult LC, which has been validated by many studies
            with variable results. 2–4  To improve the predictive value of this   anesthesia, had comorbidity (except diabetes and hypertension),
            scoring system, very few modifications have been proposed; these   bleeding diathesis, operation which were prolonged due to
                                             5,6
            are complicated and too much elaborated.  Here we propose   nontechnical reasons (light or instrument failure), and patient not
            a simple modified scoring system that can be done bedside   giving consent for the study. Patients were admitted a day before
            preoperatively and compare its efficacy to the original scoring   surgery, and a detailed history and examination were done along
            system.                                            with documentation of the investigations. A score was given to each
                                                               patient preoperatively according to the modified scoring system as
                                                               well as the Randhawa scoring system (Table 1) to label each patient
            MAterIAls And Methods                              as easy or difficult LC. In both scoring systems, a score of <5 was
            A prospective study was conducted between July 2019 and   considered easy, 6 to 10 was considered difficult, and >11 as need
            December 2019 enrolling a total 102 patients who underwent LC for   for conversion to open (Table 2).
            symptomatic cholelithiasis. All patients were operated by a single   Standard four-port LC was performed with pneumoperitoneum
            surgeon, with experience of more than five years in laparoscopic   of 12 mm Hg. A standard intraoperative protocol was followed
            surgery. Exclusion criteria had those patients who were unfit for   in each patient starting with bile duct timeout to visualize the


            © Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers. 2021 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
            (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give
            appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons
            Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41