Page 22 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery

Sheriff Z Kotb et al
both groups but more in the second group. Operative 6. Ben Hur H, Phipps JH. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Am
blood loss was higher in the LAVH group. Two cases Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2000 Feb;7(1):140-146.
in the LAVH group were converted to laparotomy to 7. Reich H, Roberts L. Laparoscopic hysterectomy in current
gynecological practice. Gynaec Pract 2003 Jun;3(1):32-40.
control bleeding and to repair a urinary bladder tear. The 8. Munver, R, Del Pizzo, JJ, Sosa, RE. The evolution and current
HALH group showed less analgesic consumption, earlier applications of hand assisted laparoscopy. Contemporary
ambulation, shorter hospital stay, and earlier regain of Urology, 2003;15(10):30-58.
daily and coital activities. On the contrary, the HALH 9. Meijer DW, Bannernberg JJ, Jakimowicz JJ. Hand – assisted
group had much more direct costs. endosc 2000;14:891-895.
10. Ikram M, Saeed M, Shazia J. Hysterectomy comparison
KEY MESSAGES of laparoscopic assisted vaginal versus total abdominal
hysterectomy. Professional Med J 2012 Mar-Apr;19(2):
Hand-assisted laparoscopic technique was successfully 214-221.
developed and manual access to the laparoscopic field 11. Park J-Y, Kim D-Y, Kim J-H, Kim YM, Kim YT, Nam JH.
facilitated completion of an otherwise minimally invasive Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy for elderly
patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol
procedure. 2012 Sep;207(3):195.e1-195.e8.
We demonstrated that HALH is technically feasible, 12. Hong JH, Choi JS, Lee JH, Eom JM, Ko JH, Bae JW, Park SH.
and in selected cases may provide an alternative to Can laparoscopic radical hysterectomy be a standard surgical
conventional techniques of hysterectomy. modality in stage IA2–IIA cervical cancer? Gynec Oncol 2012
Modifications in the technique that reduce surgical Oct;127(1):102-106.
time would be beneficial and careful case selection and 13. Ding DC, Chu TY, Chan YH. Trend changes in the proportion
of minimal invasive hysterectomies over a five-year period:
preparation is important for a successful outcome. a single-center experience. Tzu Chi Med J 2012 Sep;24(3):
In our study the direct cost of HALH was much 136-138.
more than laparoscopic hysterectomy, because the LAP 14. Twijnstra ARH, Kianmanesh Rad NA, Smeets MJGH,
®
DISC alone costs about £850. So we recommend its Admiraal JF, Jansen FW. Twenty-first century laparoscopic
usage in patients with large uteri as the indirect costs of hysterectomy: Should we not leave the vaginal step out?
Gynecol Surg 2009 Nov;6(4):311-316.
conventional laparotomy may exceed the direct costs of 15. Shin JW, Lee HH, Lee SP, Park CY. Total laparoscopic
hand-assisted surgery. hysterectomy and laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
JSLS 2011 Apr-Jun;15(2):218-221.
REFERENCES 16. Song X, Waters HC, Pan K, Subramanian D, Sedgley RC,
Raff GJ. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy versus
1. Gil-Moreno A, Puig O, Perez-Benavente MA, Díaz B, Vergés R, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. JSLS 2011 Oct-
De la Torre J, Martínez-Palones JM, Xercavins J. Total Dec;15(4):460-470.
laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type II–III) with pelvic 17. Soliman HO, Elsebaie HI, Gad ZS, Iskandar SS, Gareer WY.
lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer. J Minim Laparoscopic hysterectomy in the treatment of endometrial
Invasive Gynecol 2005 Mar-Apr;12(2):113-120. cancer: NCI experience. J Egyptian Natl Cancer Inst 2011
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center Sep;23(3):101-104.
for Health Statistics. Number of all-listed procedures for 18. Shiota M, Kotani Y, Umemoto M, Tobiume T, Hoshiai H.
discharges from short stay hospitals: United States, 2010 [cited Indication for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
2013 Jan 1]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ JSLS 2011 Jul-Sep;15(3):343-345.
nhds/10 Detailed diagnoses procedures/2010 det10_ all listed 19. Twijnstra AR, Blikkendaal MD, van Zwet EW, van Kesteren
procedures.pdf. PJ, de Kroon CD, Jansen FW. Predictors of successful surgical
3. Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, outcome in laparoscopic hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2012
Garry R, van Voorst S, Mol BW, Kluivers KB. Surgical Apr;119(4):700-708.
approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. 20. Yi YX, Zhang W, Zhou Q, Guo WR, Su Y. Laparoscopic-
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009 Jul8;(3):CD003677. assisted vaginal hysterectomy vs abdominal hysterec-
4. Farquhar CM, et al. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99(2):229-234. tomy for benign disease: a meta-analysis of randomized
5. Reich H, de Cripo J, McGlynn F. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. controlled trials. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011 Nov;
J Gynecol Surg 1989;5:213-215. 159(1):1-18.

70