Page 54 - WJOLS - Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 54
S
WJOLS
WJOL
10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1322
Laparoscopy in Cesarean Scar Pregnancy
RevieW ARticLe
Laparoscopy in Cesarean Scar Pregnancy
R Meenakshi Menon
ABSTRACT detection is possible, mean gestational age at diagnosis
Introduction: With the increase in rates of cesarean deliveries, being 7.5 ± 2.5 weeks with interval between last cesarean
complications in subsequent pregnancies like placenta accreta/ section and CSP being 6 months to 12 years. 1
percreta, uterine rupture, and cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy Cesarean scar pregnancy has been hypothesized
are on the rise. Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) accounts for to occur from an early invasion of myometrium which
about 2 to 4% of all ectopic pregnancies. Improvement in diag-
nostic techniques and advancement in transvaginal ultrasound occurs through a microscopic tract in the cesarean scar
and advent of minimal access surgery has contributed to early tissue. 2
detection and timely management of CSP. Two types of CSP have been explained: Endogenic or
Objective: This article aims to review different treatment type I and exogenic or type II. Endogenic CSP progresses
modalities of CSP and hence to compare efficacy of laparo toward cervicoisthmic space, or uterine cavity could
scopy with other management techniques. progress to viability but with high risk of bleeding from
Materials and methods: Case series, retrospective cohort placental site.
studies, and articles were reviewed which included studies from Type II progresses toward bladder or abdominal
PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane library, and EMBASE. The main cavity with deep invasion of scar defect. Type II usually
outcome was successful firstline treatment. Complications
during treatment were listed as bleeding more than 1 L, blood complicates with uterine rupture or bleeding early in
transfusion, hysterectomy, and laparotomy. pregnancy. 3
Ultrasound plays a pivotal role in diagnosis. Cesar-
Results: Successful treatment and reduced complications
were noted with laparoscopy as compared with medical ean scar pregnancy (Fig. 1) is characterized by certain
4
management. ultrasound findings :
Conclusion: Interventional than medical approach is preferred • Empty uterus and cervical canal
in management of CSP. Laparoscopic surgery helps in removal • Gestational Saction located in anterior uterine wall (part
of ectopic tissue in cesarean scar with simultaneous repair of of isthmus) with diminished or absent myometrium
the defect under adequate visualization. between gestational sac and bladder and discontinuity
Keywords: Cesarean scar pregnancy, Ectopic pregnancy, in anterior wall of uterus adjacent to gestational sac
Laparoscopy. • Circular blood flow surrounding the sac on Doppler.
How to cite this article: Menon RM. Laparoscopy in Cesarean Aborting gestation and cervical pregnancy are easily
Scar Pregnancy. World J Lap Surg 2017;10(3):135-138. mistaken for a CSP.
Source of support: Nil Early diagnosis with high index of suspicion and timely
management depending on the availability, skill of surgeon,
Conflict of interest: None
and severity of symptoms are of prime importance.
The treatment options available and reviewed are
INTRODUCTION • Dilation and curettage (D&C) and excision of tropho-
National Family Health Survey 2014 to 2015 reveals that blastic tissue using laparoscopy or laparotomy
rate of cesarean surgery has doubled over the last decade • Local or systemic methotrexate (MTX)
from 8.5% in 2005 to 17.2% in 2015. Thus, complications
like CSP have also been on the rise. Incidence of CSP has
been reported to be 1 in 1,800 to 1 in 2,200 pregnancies.
With the advent of transvaginal ultrasonography, early
Senior Resident
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. John’s Medical
College Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Corresponding Author: R Meenakshi Menon, 1069, Poorna
Shree, Sector 7, HSR Layout, Bengaluru 560102, Karnataka
India, Phone: +919746758373, e-mail: rmeenamenon@
gmail.com
Fig. 1: Ultrasonographic view of a scar ectopic
World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, September-December 2017;10(3):135-138 135