Page 50 - WJOLS - Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery

WJOLS

LSG vs LRYGB Surgery in Obese and Morbidly Obese Patients
online literature search from Medline, PubMed, and
Excess weight loss better with LRYGB and comorbidity resolution similar efficacy at end of 1 year. But at 5 years, similar excess weight loss in both groups. More complications in Both LRYGB and LSG safe procedures for weight loss and resolution of comorbidities at 18 months Similar long-term weight loss between LRYGB and LSG. No difference in two procedures in EWL after 2 years LRYGB provides better weight loss and resolution to diab
Cochrane central. The article was to see if the popular
procedure of LRYGB was better than or comparable to

complex operative procedure, which entails longer
operative time compared with LSG and, in some studies,
comparatively longer hospital stay. The incidence of
postoperative complications has not been much in both
Conclusion LSG group at 5 years postsurgery study groups since surgeons who have achieved a good
learning curve in bariatric surgery have done the above
studies. The studies detailed above show that with
LRYGB, there is a sustained excessive weight loss even on
prolonged follow-up compared with LSG. On a limited
One-year follow-up and 5 year-follow-up Follow-up at 6, 12, and 18 months done. Weight loss better in LRYGB at 18 months Yearly follow-up for up to 5-year period Follow-up period of follow-up, both LSG and LRYGB show similar excessive

weight loss and resolution of comorbidities. The need of
long-term follow-up is emphasized and also to ensure that
Follow-up done 1 year patients are not lost to follow-up to ensure data collection.

CONCLUSION
Operative outcome Operative time marginally higher for LRYGB group Operative time longer in LRYGB Operative time longer for LRYGB than LSG No adverse postoperative outcome in either group The LRYGB shows better excessive weight loss on long-
term follow-up compared with LSG. Resolution of comor-
bidities in both procedures has similar efficacy. More
studies which have 5-year and longer follow-up will be
useful in this regard.
117 patients of whom 75 were assigned to LRYGB and 42 to 36 LRYGB and 34 LSG 226 patients assigned to LRYGB and 208 to LSG 74 patients underwent LSG and 285 patients underwent REFERENCES

1. Franco JV, Ruiz PA, Palermo M, Gagner M. A review of
studies comparing three laparoscopic procedures in bariat-
ric surgery: sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
and adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg 2011 Sept;21(9):
1458-1468.
Study group LRYGB 2. Daskalakis M, Weiner RA. Sleeve gastrectomy as a single-
stage bariatric operation: indications and limitations. Obes
LSG
Facts 2009;2 (Suppl 1):8-10.
3. Wittgrove AC, Clark GW, Tremblay LJ. Laparoscopic gastric
bypass, Roux-en-Y: preliminary report of five cases. Obes
Year study was conducted January 2008– December 2008 January 2008– June 2011 Retrospective review from 2005 to 2011 January 2004– January 2013 4. Leyba JL, Aulestia SN, Llopis SN. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y
Surg 1994 Nov;4(4):353-357.
gastric bypass versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for
the treatment of morbid obesity. A prospective study of 117
patients. Obes Surg 2011 Feb;21(2):212-216.

surgery in China–reevaluation of surgical indications and
Year of publishing July 2014 September 2013 March 2014 December 2014 5. Li X, Zheng C, Rosenthal RJ. The new concept of bariatric
criteria of therapeutic effect of laparoscopy for treatment of
obesity. Obes Surg 2008 Apr;18(9):1180-1182.
6. Wittgrove AC, Clark GW, Tremblay LJ. Laparoscopic Gastric
Bypass, Roux-en-Y: Preliminary Report of Five Cases. Obes
Surg. 1994;4(4):353–357.
7. Edholm D, Svensson F, Naslund I, Karlsson FA, Rask E,
Name of principal author Leyba et al 4 Torre Médica Terras Plaza, Caracas, Venezuela Albeladi B et al 17 Department of Digestive and Bariatric Surgery, TOURS University Hospital (Hôpital Trousseau),Tour, France Lim et al Department of General Surgery, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, California Jeremei Thereaux et al Ambroise Pare University Hospital, France 8. Himpens J, Verbrugghe A, Cadiere GB, Everaerts W, Greve JW.
Sundbom M. Long-term results 11 years after primary
gastric bypass in 384 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2012 Sep-
Oct;9(5):708-713.
Long-term results of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass:
evaluation after 9 years. Obes Surg 2012 Oct;22(10):1586-1593.
(Cont’d…) and institute 9. NIH Conference. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity.
Consensus Development Conference Panel. Ann Intern Med
1991 Dec;115(12):956-961.
World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, September-December 2017;10(3):129-132 131