Page 49 - WJOLS - Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 49

Shalmali Alva                                                                                (Cont’d…)




                             Both LRYGB and LSG have good  outcomes in weight loss and resolution  of comorbidity. Better long-term weight   Weight loss maintenance in LRYGB  better. Resolution of comorbidities   Weight loss better with LRYGB at 2  year follow-up, but resolution of type II  DM similar in both LSG and LRYGB  Both LRYGB and LSG promote  significant remission rate in metabolic  syndrome over 12 months. EWL better   In the short term, LSG has better  safe








                           Conclusion  loss for LRYGB  same in both   in LRYGB










                           Follow-up  Median follow-up   period of 24 months.   Weight loss at end of   12 months similar  Followed up for   period of 5 years   postoperative till 2013  Follow-up of 2 years   in postoperative   period  Excessive weight   loss (EWL) better in   LRYGB at end of 1   year compared with   LSG  Follow-up at 6, 12,   and 24 months. At 24   months, the %EWL   lesser in patients of   LSG vs patients of   LRYGB  One-year follow-up   and smaller




                           Operative outcome  Operative time   higher for LRYGB.   Long-term weight   at end of 4 years   better for LRYGB  Weight loss   better in LRYGB   except in first   postoperative year  LRYGB had longer   operative time and   technically more   complicated but   reversible. LSG   not reversible  Postoperative   hospital stay   longer in LRYGB   group  Postoperative   readmission rates   for LRYGB higher   for complaints of   dehydration and   p




                     Table 1: Comparitive studies  249 patients between 18 and  60 years. Of these 135 patients   64 patients randomly assigned   controlled trials, 4 retrospective   114 patients were randomized










                           Study group  underwent LRYGB and 114   patients underwent LSG  to either LRYGB or LSG  Among all 16 included  studies, 1 was randomized  controlled trial and 15 were  nonrandomized (11 parallel   observational studies)  102 patients diagnosed with   metabolic syndrome (63  undergoing LRYGB and 39   undergoing LSG)  Total of 885 patients. 547  patients underwent LRYGB  (61.8%) and 338 underwent   LSG (38.2 %)  at time of surgery, 56 to SR-  L





                        Year study was   conducted  January 2004–  October 2011  January 2007–  July 2008  Database   collected from   inception to   September 2013   from CNKI,   Embase, and   PubMed  Between 2010   and 2013  Retrospective   analysis of   data conducted   between January   2009 and   December 2012  October 2011–  October 2015   RCT









                        Year of   publishing  November   2012  May 2014  June 2014  February   2017  August   2014  August   2017







                        Name of principal author    and institute Pablo Vidal et al (Hospital del Mar  Institut d’Investigacions Mèdiques,   Barcelona, Spain)  Yong Zhang et al, Center of  Minimally Invasive Surgery,  Nankai, Hospital of Tianjin Medical   University, China Chengda Zhang et al Peking  Union Medical College, Chinese  Academy of Medical Sciences,  Beijing, People’s Republic of China  Rodrigo Koprovski Menguer et al  Diabetes and Obesity Education  and Re











          130
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54