Page 58 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 58

CLINICAL TECHNIQUE
            Is Laparoscopy Valuable for Detection of Distal Fallopian

            Tubal Peristalsis?


                      1
            Atef Darwish , Dina Darwish 2
            Received on: 14 December 2022; Accepted on: 20 February 2023; Published on: 05 September 2023

             AbstrAct
             Objectives: To evaluate the usefulness of employing laparoscopy to observe distal fallopian tube (FT) peristalsis and to compare its efficacy to
             the hysteroscopic viewing of proximal FT peristalsis in normal and hydrosalpingeal FT.
             Design: A prospective comparative cohort study.
             Patients and methods: One hundred and fifteen infertile women undergoing concomitant diagnostic or operative laparoscopy and hysteroscopy
             were divided into two groups. Group A comprised 59 cases with apparently normal FTs while group B comprised 56 cases with hydrosalpingies.
             Setting: Endoscopy unit of a tertiary university hospital.
             Methods: Fallopian tube status was assessed during diagnostic or therapeutic laparoscopy, including whether morphologically normal and
             patent or not. Whenever possible, monitoring of the distal ends of both FTs was performed to detect any potential peristalsis. The proximal
             portions of each FT were then subjected to hysteroscopy to assess proximal tubal peristalsis. The effectiveness of laparoscopy in assessing
             distal FT peristalsis and comparing its findings to the hysteroscopic assessment of proximal FT peristalsis in normal and pathologic FT were
             the primary outcomes.
             Results: Laparoscopic detection of distal tubal peristalsis either in normal or hydrosalpingeal FT was low [5 (4.2%) and 5 (4.4%)] in both groups,
             respectively. After the exclusion of cases with unilateral patent FT from group B, the percentage dropped to 3.2% (only three FT). Hysteroscopic
             detection of proximal tubal peristalsis was significantly higher in group A [80 (67.8%) vs 40 (35.7%)] in total group B.
             Conclusions: Laparoscopic evaluation of distal FT peristalsis, whether for healthy or pathologic FT, is of limited utility and is not advised. Its
             effectiveness is significantly lower than the hysteroscopic evaluation of proximal FT peristalsis.
             Keywords: Anatomy, Hysteroscopy, Hydrosalpinx, Laparoscopy, Peristalsis, Physiology.
             World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery (2023): 10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1563



            IntroductIon
            Peristalsis, or the contractility of the fallopian tube (FT), is a   1,2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Assiut University, Assiut,
            recognized physiological phenomenon. For the proximal, middle,   Egypt
            and distal sections, respectively, it may be continuous tonic   Corresponding Author:  Atef  Darwish, Department  of  Obstetrics
            contractions, brief periodic contractions, or a series of oscillating   and Gynecology, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt, Phone:
            movements. It provides proper mixing of tubal secretions necessary   +20 0201001572723, e-mail: atef_darwish@yahoo.com
            for the gametes and embryo, acts as a functional gate at the utero-  How to cite this article: Darwish A, Darwish D. Is Laparoscopy Valuable
            tubal junction and ampullary–isthmic junction, and aids in the   for Detection of Distal Fallopian Tubal Peristalsis? World J Lap Surg
                                                   1,2
            oocyte pick-up process in the three parts, respectively.  It has been   2023;16(1):57–60.
                                                3
            proven for a very long period in several animals,  experimental or    Source of support: Nil
            in vitro human research. 4–6  Right now, it is accepted that FT patency   Conflict of interest: None
                                                            7
            testing is considered a tubal function test that includes peristalsis.
            Numerous cases of infertility have been satisfactorily explained
                                                            8
            by gynecologic endoscopy in contemporary clinical practice.
            Endoscopic visualization of proximal FT peristalsis is achievable   and was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT03953586). It
                                  9
            utilizing office hysteroscopy.  The purpose of this study was to   included infertile women in the reproductive age group subjected
            evaluate the utility of laparoscopy for distal FT peristalsis visibility   to combined laparoscopy and hysteroscopy to be done under
            in normal and hydrosalpingeal FT, and to compare outcomes to   general anesthesia due to different indications as previously
                                                                            10
            hysteroscopic detection of proximal FT peristalsis.  recommended.  After proper counseling, informed written
                                                               consent was taken from every case. Detailed clinical, sonographic,
                                                               and radiologic assessments of all cases were similar to a previous
            PAtIents And Methods                               study on the same cases.  Intraoperatively, patients were divided
                                                                                  11
            This is a prospective comparative cohort study done at the   into two groups according to the laparoscopic appearance of the
            Endoscopy Unit of the Woman’s Health Hospital, Assiut, Egypt,   FT. If the FT was patent after a chromopertubation test, of normal
            between December 10, 2019 and August 20, 2020. It was approved   size, length, integrity, external surface, and fimbriae; the patient
            by the Assiut Medical School Ethical Review Board (#17101059)   was allocated in group A regardless of the existence, extent, and

            © The Author(s). 2023 Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.
            org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to
            the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain
            Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63