Page 9 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 9

Laparoscopic vs Mini-incision Open Appendectomy
            stump leak. The peritoneum and fascia were approximated using   while categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and
            2/0 vicryl sutures. The incision in the skin was closed by using 1/0   percentages. Graphically, the data was presented by bar diagrams.
            non-absorbable suture.                             Student’s independent t-test was used for comparing continuous
                                                               variables, while Chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test was used
            Postoperative Course                               for comparing categorical variables. A p <0.05 was considered
            In the postoperative period intravenous fluids were continued for   statistically significant. All p values were two-tailed ones.
            12 hours. All patients were given two doses of third-generation
            cephalosporin, one dose was given at the time of intubation
            and another was given 12 hours after surgery. Patients with   results And observAtIons
            complicated appendicitis received a combination of third-  The total number of patients studied was 101, out of which 52
            generation cephalosporin and metronidazole. For purpose of   were taken for MIA and 49 for LA. We did not convert any of the
            analgesia, all patients were put on paracetamol infusion during the   laparoscopic procedures to open surgery.
            procedure followed by 75-mg intramuscular diclofenac sodium as   The patients who were taken for MIA had a mean age of 31.9
            and when needed.                                   (13.06) years, while the patients who were taken for LA group had
               During the postoperative period, pulse rate, blood pressure,   a mean age of 32.4 (14.34) years (Table 1). Thus, both groups were
            temperature, and respiratory rate were monitored in all patients.   comparable as far as the age is concerned, with no statistically
            All patients were monitored for VAS at 6, 12, and 24 hours after   significant difference (p >0.05). In MIA group, out of 52 patients, 31
            surgery and same was recorded in the already prepared pro    (59.6%) were males and 21 (40.4%) were females, while in LA group,
            forma. The patients were allowed to take a clear liquid diet once   out of 49 patients, 24 (49%) were males and 25 (51%) were females
            the bowel sounds were present, followed by a regular diet. The   with p >0.05, which is statistically insignificant.
            patients were monitored for various clinical parameters which were   The patients who underwent MIA had an operating time
            recorded in already prepared pro forma. These parameters included   ranging from 30–35 minutes, with a mean of 32.7 (2.52) while
            total operative time, number of doses of analgesia received in   patients who were subjected to LA had the operative time ranging
            the immediate postoperative period, time taken to resume oral   from 25–30 minutes, with a mean of 26.9 (2.46). The difference in
            intake, pain score, hospital stay, and complications if any. Pain   operating time was statistically significant in favor of LA (p <0.001)
            score was assessed independently by the resident doctors using   (Table 1).
            10-cm unscaled VAS. The patients were advised to take tablet of   Intraoperative bleeding was seen in 2 (3.84%) patients
            aceclofenac 100 mg as an analgesia as and when needed. Total   belonging to MIA group while another 2 (3.84%) patients had an
            operative time was calculated from the time of incision in the skin   iatrogenic injury to bowel. No such complication was seen in any
            till the placement of last suture.                 of the patients taken for laparoscopy (p >0.05) (Table 2).
               The patients were discharged on oral antibiotics and were   The patients belonging to LA group experienced less pain in
            advised to take analgesic tablets as and when needed and to   contrast to MIA group on a VAS. The overall pain score in MIA was
            keep a record of it. The follow-up was done in the outpatient clinic   2.86 (1.184) in MIA and 2.30 (1.022) in case of LA. This difference in
            at weekly intervals for a period of 1 month. During follow-up, a   pain between the two groups was statistically significant with a
            detailed history was taken and thorough examination was done   p <0.001 (Table 1).
            as per the pro forma.                                 The number of injectable analgesics needed during the first
                                                               24 hours after surgery was significantly higher in MIA group
            Statistical Analysis                               as compared to LA group with p = 0.002, which is statistically
            All observed data was compiled and entered in a spreadsheet   significant (p <0.05). After discharge from the hospital, the number
            (Microsoft Excel) and then exported to data editor of Statistical   of analgesic tablets taken by patients who underwent LA was less
            Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), version 20.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago,   as compared to patients who underwent MIA, which was again
            Illinois, USA). Continuous variables were expressed as mean (SD),   statistically significant (Table 1).

            Table 1: Comparison of study variables between two groups
                                                      Mini-incision open      Laparoscopic appendectomy
                                                  appendectomy group, N = 52       group, N = 49
             Parameter                                  Mean (SD)                   Mean (SD)             p-value
             Age (years)                               31.9 (13.06)                 32.4 (14.34)           0.876
             Operating time (minutes)                  32.7 (2.52)                  26.9 (2.46)            0.001
                                                         (30–35)                     (24–30)
             Intraoperative complications                  4                           0                   0.118
             Postoperative pain score on VAS (1–10)    2.86 (1.184)                 2.30 (1.022)           0.001
             Analgesic injection requirement           2.05 (1.09)                  1.41 (0.93)            0.002
             Postoperative complication                    11                          1                  <0.008
             Hospital stay above 30 hours                  52                          5                  <0.001
             Analgesic tablet requirement               5.3 (1.31)                  3.2 (1.17)             0.001
             Return to routine activities in 1–2 weeks   2 (3.8%)                    47 (96%)             <0.001*
            *Significant when p <0.05

                                                 World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, Volume 15 Issue 3 (September–December 2022)  195
   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14