Page 52 - tmp

Adopting Culture of Safety for LC
5. Slater K, Strong RW, Wall DR, et al. Iatrogenic bile duct injury: the “critical view of safety” technique. J Gastrointest Surg 2009;13(3):
scourge of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. ANZ J Surg 2002;72(2): 498–503. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-008-0748-8.
83–88. DOI: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2002.02315.x. 19. Heistermann HP, Tobusch A, Palmes D. Prevention of bile duct
6. Way LW, Stewart L, Ganter W, et al. Causes and prevention of lap- injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. “The critical view of
aroscopic bile duct injuries: analysis of 252 cases from a human safety.” Zentralbl Chir 2006;131(6):460–465. DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-
factors and cognitive psychology perspective. Ann Surg 2003;237(4): 957031.
460–469. DOI: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000060680.92690.E9. 20. Huge TB. New Strategies to prevent laparoscopic bile duct injury.
7. Pucher PH, Brunt LM, Fanelli RD, et al. SAGES expert Delphi Surgeons can learn from pilots. Surgery 2002;132(5):826–835. DOI:
consensus: critical factors for safe surgical practice in laparoscopic 10.1067/msy.2002.127681.
cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2015;29(11):3074–3085. DOI: 10.1007/ 21. Huge TB, Kelly MD, Mekisic A. Rouviere’s sulcus: a useful landmark in
s00464-015-4079-z. laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1997;84(9):1253–1235. DOI:
8. Teilum D. The prevalence of gallstones in autopsies from a Danish 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1997.02769.x.
urban area. Frederiksberg 1914-1955. Acta Chir Scand 1989;155(2): 22. Singh K, Ohri A. Anatomic landmarks: their usefulness in safe
103–106. PMID: 2787087. laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2006;20(11):1754–1758.
9. Schirmer BD, Winters KL, Edlich RF. Cholelithiasis and cholecystitis. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0528-4.
J Long Term Eff Med Implants 2005;15(3):329–338. DOI: 10.1615/ 23. Ladocsi LT, Benitez LD, Filippone DR, et al. Intraoperative chol-
jlongtermeffmedimplants.v15.i3.90. angiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review of 734
10. Calland JF, Tanaka K, Foley E, et al. Outpatient laparoscopic consecutive cases. Am Surg 1997;63(2):150–156. PMID: 9012429.
cholecystectomy: patient out-comes after implementation of a 24. Sheffield KM, Riall TS, Han Y, et al. Association between chole-
clinical pathway. Ann Surg 1998;227(3):343–350. PMID: 11323509. cystectomy with vs without intraoperative cholangiography and
11. Shea JA, Berlin JA, Bachwich DR, et al. Indication for and outcomes of risk of common duct injury. JAMA 2013;310(8):812–820. DOI: 10.1001/
cholecystectomy: a comparison of the pre and postlaparoscopic eras. jama.2013.276205.
Ann Surg 1998;227(3):343–350. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199803000- 25. Hope WW Fanelli R, Walsh DS, et al. SAGES clinical spotlight review:
00005. intraoperative cholangiography. Surg Endosc 2017;31(5):2007–2016.
12. Lillemoe KD, Lin JW, Talamini MA, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5320-0.
as a “true” outpatient procedure: initial experience in 130 26. Ford JA, Soop M, Du J, et al. Systematic review of intraoperative
consecutive patients. J Gastrointest Surg 1999;3(1):44–49. PMID cholangiography in cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2012;99(2):160–167.
10457323. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7809.
13. Giger UF, Michel JM, Opitz, et al. Risk factors for perioperative 27. Biffl WL, Moore EE, Offner PJ, et al. Routine intraoperative laparo-
complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: scopic ultrasonography with selective cholangiography reduces
analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of bile duct complication during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am
Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery database. J Am Coll Surg Coll Surg 2001;193(3):272–280. DOI: 10.1016/s1072-7515(01)00991-7.
2006;203(5):723–728. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.07.018. 28. Machi J, Johnson JO, Deziel DJ, et al. The routine use of laparoscopic
14. Altieri MS, Brunt LM. Elimination of bile duct injury in cholecys- ultrasound decreases bile duct injury: a multicenter study. Surg
tectomy. In: Cameron JL, editor. Advances in surgery. p. 145–160. Endosc 2009;23(2):384–388. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-9985-x.
15. Strasberg SM, Brunt LM. Rationale and use of the critical view of 29. Kapoor VK. ‘Calleaguography’ in place of cholangiography, to prevent
safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2010;211(1): bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Minim Access
132–138. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.02.053. Surg 2019;15(3):273–274. DOI: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_165_18.
16. Yegiyants S, Collins JC. Operative strategy can reduce the incidence 30. Sutherland F, Dixion E. The importance of cognitive map placement
of major bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg in bile duct injuries. Can J Surg 2017;60(6):424–425. DOI: 10.1503/
2008;74(10):985–987. PMID: 18942628. cjs.008816.
17. Auyang ED, Hungness ES, Vazir K, et al. Natural orifice transluminal 31. Lattoo MR, Mirab M, Khaki MS, et al. Relevance of a detached observer
endoscopic surgery (NOTES): dissection for the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an observation study. World
during transcolonic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2009;23(5): J Pharm Res 2019;8(4):785–788. DOI: 10.20959/wjpr20194-14518.
117–118. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0407-5. 32. Hori T, Oike F, Furuyama H, et al. Protocol for laparoscopic chole-
18. Avgerinas C, Kelgiorgi D, Touloumis Z, et al. One thousand cystectomy: is it rocked science. World J Gastroenterol 2016;22(47):
laparoscopic cholecystectomies in a single surgical unit using the 10287–10303. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i47.10287.

194 World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, Volume 14 Issue 3 (September–December 2021)