Page 49 - tmp
P. 49

RESEARCH ARTICLE
            Adopting “Culture of Safety for Laparoscopic

            Cholecystectomy” in a Rural Hospital: A Prospective

            Observational Study


                                             2
                           1
            Mohd Riyaz Lattoo , Prince Ajaz Ahmad , Sadaf Ali Bangri 3
             AbstrAct
             Background: The most feared complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy is injury to bile duct. Different strategies have been proposed to
             avoid this serious complication. Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) “Culture of Safe Cholecystectomy” is
             one such strategy.
             Aim: This study was done to evaluate and validate SAGES “Culture of Safe Cholecystectomy” components modified and tailored to the setting
             of a rural hospital with emphasis on a bystander surgeon.
             Materials and methods: This was a prospective study of 382 patients with gallstone disease who underwent surgery at District Hospital,
             Anantnag, a rural hospital from September 2016 to September 2018.
             Results: Mean age of patients was 43 years. Two-hundred and ninety-eight (78%) patients were females, and 84 (22%) were male with male
             female ratio of 1:3.54. Most common indication was chronic cholecystitis in 213 patients (55.7%). Bystander surgeon was present in all cases.
             Critical view of safety (CVS) was achieved in 256 patients (67%). Rouviere’s sulcus was present in 242 patients (63.3%). Bailout option was
             adopted in 19 patients (4.97%). Conversation to open cholecystectomy was done in 11 of the 382 patients (2.87%). Most common indication
             for conversion was inability to achieve CVS. Mean duration of surgery was 45 minutes. None of the patients in our study had bile duct injury.
             Conclusion: SAGES culture of safe cholecystectomy can be modified to make it applicable to rural hospitals in developing countries where
             more reliance can be put on a detached bystander surgeon who is likely available in the vicinity.
             Keywords: Bile duct injury, Calot’s triangle, Common bile duct, Cholangiography, Cholelithiasis, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
             World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery (2021): 10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1470



            IntroductIon                                       1–3 Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Sher-I-Kashmir Institute
            In modern surgical practice, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)   of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
            is the most frequent surgical procedure performed on digestive   Corresponding Author: Mohd Riyaz Lattoo, Department of Surgical
                        1
            tract worldwide.  It is considered to be the procedure of choice   Gastroenterology, Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences,
                                                    2
            for the treatment of symptomatic gallstone disease.  Iatrogenic   Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India, Phone: +91 9419049425, e-mail:
            bile duct injury (BDI) is the most concerning complication after   riyazlattoo@gmail.com
            LC. The incidence of this complication is variable but usually   How to cite this article: Lattoo MR, Ahmad PA, Bangri SA. Adopting
                         3,4
            approaches 0.5%.  BDI continues to happen, and despite advances   “Culture of Safety for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy” in a Rural
                                                       5
            in technology, there has been no decline in rate of injury.  About   Hospital: A Prospective Observational Study.  World J Lap Surg
            97% of iatrogenic biliary ductal injury are attributed to visual   2021;14(3):191–194.
                                                        6
            misinterpretation of biliary anatomy during the procedure.  Many   Source of support: Nil
            strategies have been proposed to avoid this serious complication.   Conflict of interest: None
            Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons’
            (SAGES) culture of safe cholecystectomy is a strategy directed
                                                            7
            to decrease this complication. It consists of six components.    setting under general anesthesia with four-port technique. We
            This study was done to evaluate and validate these components,   excluded patients with body mass index >30 (as our rural hospital
            modified and tailored to the setting of a rural hospital with emphasis   was not equipped with facilities to operate on obese patients) and
            on a bystander surgeon.                            patients with acute cholecystitis who presented beyond 72 hours of
                                                               symptom development from our study. We adopted components
            MAterIAls And Methods                              of safe cholecystectomy tailored to our settings of a rural hospital
                                                               with emphasis on bystander surgeon as detailed below.
            This was a prospective study conducted at District Hospital
            Anantnag, a rural health care center located in the Indian valley of   •  Operating surgeon dissected Calot’s triangle and ensured that
            Kashmir, from September 2016 to September 2018. Three-hundred   critical view of safety (CVS) was achieved.
            and eighty-two patients admitted for LC were enrolled. Clinical   •  Starting dissection from a fixed extra biliary point, i.e., Rouviere’s
            history, physical examination, blood counts, biochemistry, and   sulcus.
            abdominal ultrasound were routine in all patients. Preanesthetic   •  Intraoperative time-out before transecting cystic duct and
            check-up was done in all. The operations were done in elective   artery.

            © The Author(s). 2021 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.
            org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to
            the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain
            Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54