Page 24 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery

Safety and Feasibility of Sleeve Gastrectomy with Loop Duodenal Switch
3 m common channel compared to BPD-DS. 4,29 In our study, we 11. Lauti M, Kularatna M, Hill AG, et al. Weight regain following sleeve
observed that these bowel problems were triggered when there gastrectomy—a systematic review. Obes Surg 2016;26(6):1326. DOI:
was oil, spice, or chilly in the food. So, our patients were advised to 10.1007/s11695-016-2152-x.
avoid these items after surgery. 12. Dijkhorst PJ, Boerboom AB, Janssen IMC, et al. Failed sleeve
gastrectomy: single anastomosis duodenoileal bypass or roux-
en-Y gastric bypass? A multicenter cohort study. Obes Surg
conclusIon 2018;28(12):3834–3842. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-018-3429-z.
This study showed that SLDS surgery is safe and feasible. Nutritional 13. Zhao H, Jiao L. Comparative analysis for the effect of roux-en-Y
complications significantly come down when the common channel gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy in patients with morbid
is increased to ≥3 m without compromising on the metabolic obesity: evidence from 11 randomized clinical trials (meta-analysis).
Int J Surg 2019;72:216–223. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.013. Epub 2019
efficacy of the procedure. More studies with long-term follow-up Nov 20.
are needed to determine the ideal common channel length to 14. Lee WJ, Chong K, Aung L, et al. Metabolic surgery for diabetes
standardize this promising procedure. treatment: sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass? World J Surg
2017;41(1):216–223. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3690-z.

clInIcAl sIgnIfIcAnce 15. Kansou G, Lechaux D, Delarue J, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve
Sleeve gastrectomy with loop duodenal switch surgery with gastrectomy vs laparoscopic mini gastric bypass: one year outcomes.
Int J Surg 2016;33(Pt A):18–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.07.051 Epub
common channel length ≥3 m simplifies BPD-DS, gives excellent 2016 Jul 22.
weight loss and diabetes remission with minimal malabsorption. 16. Magouliotis DE, Tasiopoulou VS, Tzovaras G. One anastomosis gastric
Restricting biliopancreatic limb to ≤55% prevents adverse bypass vs roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid Obesity: an updated
malabsorptive consequences. meta-analysis. Obes Surg 2019;29(9):2721–2730. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-
019-04005-0.
dIsclAIMer 17. Solouki A, Kermansaravi M, Davarpanah Jazi AH, et al. One-
anastomosis gastric bypass as an alternative procedure of choice
We hereby declare that there are no hidden conflicts of interests in morbidly obese patients. J Res Med Sci. 2018 23:84. DOI: 10.4103/
either financial or plagiarism related or any other related to the jrms.JRMS_386_18.eCollection 2018.
clinical content and work of this manuscript. 18. Kessler Y, Adelson D, Mardy-Tilbor L, et al. Nutritional status following
one anastomosis gastric bypass. Clin Nutr 2019;39(2):599–605. DOI:
10.1016/j.clnu.2019.03.008 [Epub ahead of print].
references 19. Martini F, Paolino L, Marzano E, et al. Single-anastomosis pylorus-
1. Tam CS, Berthoud HR, Bueter M, et al. Could the mechanisms of preserving Bariatric procedures: review of the literature. Obes Surg
bariatric surgery hold the key for novel therapies? report from a 2016;26(10):2503–2515. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-016-2310-1.
Pennington scientific symposium. Obes Rev 2011;12(11):984–994. 20. Copăescu C. Laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00902.x Epub 2011 Jul 6. switch—the most effective operation for type II diabetes Mellitus.
2. Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, et al. Bariatric surgery vs intensive How I do it? Chirurgia (Bucur) 2018;113(5):704–711. DOI: 10.21614/
medical therapy for diabetes—5 year outcomes. N Engl J Med chirurgia.113.5.704.
2017;376(7):641–651. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1600869. 21. Homan J, Betzel B, Aarts EO, et al. Vitamin and mineral deficiencies
3. Sánchez-Pernaute A, Herrera MA, Pérez-Aguirre ME, et al. Single after biliopancreatic diversion and biliopancreatic diversion with
anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). duodenal switch—the rule rather than the exception. Obes Surg
One to three-year follow-up. Obes Surg 2010;20(12):1720–1726. DOI: 2015;25(9):1626–1632. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-015-1570-5.
10.1007/s11695-010-0247-3. 22. Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MÁ, Cabrerizo L, et al. Single-anastomosis
4. Cottam A, Cottam D, Portenier D, et al. A matched cohort analysis of duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) for obese
stomach intestinal pylorus saving (SIPS) surgery vs biliopancreatic diabetic patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2015;11(5):1092–1098. DOI:
diversion with duodenal switch with two-year follow-up. Obes Surg 10.1016/j.soard.2015.01.024Epub 2015 Feb 7.
2017;27(2):454–461. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-016-2341-7. 23. Mitzman B, Cottam D, Goriparthi R, et al. Stomach intestinal pylorus
5. Brown WA, Ooi G, Higa K, et al. Single anastomosis duodenal-ileal sparing (SIPS) surgery for morbid Obesity: retrospective analyses of
bypass with sleeve gastrectomy/one anastomosis duodenal switch our preliminary experience. Obes Surg 2016;26(9):2098–2104. DOI:
(SADI-S/OADS) IFSO Position statement. Obes Surg 2018;28(5):1207– 10.1007/s11695-016-2077-4.
1216. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-018-3201-4. 24. Moon RC, Kirkpatrick V, Gaskins L, et al. Safety and Effectiveness
6. Cottam A, Cottam D, Roslin M, et al. A matched cohort analysis of of single—Vs double-anastomosis duodenal switch at a single
sleeve gastrectomy with and without 300 cm loop duodenal switch institution. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2019;15(2):245–252. DOI: 10.1016/j.
with 18-month follow-up. Obes Surg 2016;26:2363–2369. DOI: soard.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
10.1007/s11695-016-2133-0. 25. Cottam D, Roslin M, Enochs P, et al. Single anastomosis duodenal
7. Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio Herrera MA, Pérez-Aguirre E, et al. switch: 1 year outcomes. Obes Surg 2020;30(4):1506–1514. DOI:
Proximal duodenal–ileal end-to-side bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: 10.1007/s11695-019-04352-y.
proposed technique. Obes Surg 2007;17(12):1614–1618. DOI: 10.1007/ 26. Surve A, Rao R, Cottam D, et al. Early outcomes of primary SADI-S: an
s11695-007-9287-8. Australian experience. Obesity Surgery 2020;30(4):1429–1436. DOI:
8. Dallegrave Marchesini JC. End-to-side duodeno-jejunostomy with 10.1007/s11695-019-04312-6.
half-and-half biliopancreatic limb for the treatment of type II diabetes: 27. Shoar S, Poliakin L, Rubenstein R, et al. Single anastomosis
a proposal for a SIMPLER technique. Obes Surg 2007;17(1):138–139. duodeno-ileal switch (SADIS): a systematic review of efficacy and
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-007-9019-0. safety. Obes Surg 2018;28(1):104–113. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-017-
9. Gebelli JP, Gordejuela AG, Ramos AC, et al. SADI-S with right gastric 2838-8.
artery ligation: technical systematization and early results. Arq Bras 28. Surve A, Cottam D, Sanchez-Pernaute A, et al. The incidence of
Cir Dig 2016;29(Suppl 1):85–90. DOI: 10.1590/0102-6720201600s10021. complications associated with loop duodeno-ileostomy after single-
10. Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric surgery and anastomosis duodenal switch procedures among 1328 patients: a
endoluminal procedures: IFSO worldwide survey 2014. Obes Surg multicenter experience. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2018;14(5):594–601. DOI:
2017;27(9):2279–2289. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-017-2666-x. 10.1016/j.soard.2018.01.020 Epub 2018 Feb 2.

World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, Volume 13 Issue 3 (September–December 2020) 123