Page 29 - WALS Journal
P. 29

World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, May-August 2008;1(2):32-35
                                                       M Dhanesh Kumar
            Long-term Outcomes in Laparoscopic vs


            Open Ventral Hernia Repair


            M Dhanesh Kumar
            Dhanesh Hospital, Vellore






            Abstract                                           open or laparoscopic repair shouldbe performed it depends on

            Objective: To ruleout whether there was a difference in, recurrence  general surgeons interest. Data are still inconclusive on

            rate, morbidity, and duration of hospital stay between patients  morbidity and recurrence rates.The main purpose of this study

            undergoing open or laparoscopic ventral hernia surgery.
                                                               is to compare the outcome of the patientsundergoing open and

            Materials and methods: Cohort study in single-institution was  laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repairs in a single
            compared prospectively collected from patient cohorts undergoing  institution for a period of 10 years.
            laparoscopic or open intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair. Literature
            search was performed using search engine Google and our online facility  DATA
            of Springer Link. The following search terms were used. Laparoscopic
            versus ventral hernia repair, ‘laparoscopic repair of ventral hernia,  Data from all 651 patients who underwent ventral incisional
            controversies in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, comparison of  hernia repair between October 1995 to December 2005 at a single
            laparoscopic and open (Ventral Hernia) repair, Laparoscopic Repair  institution were collected prospectively. Patients who had

            of Ventral Hernia during obesity. About 143 citations found in total.  undergone an intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair, either openor


            Data collected from 360 consecutive patients who had undergone
            laparoscopic or open intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair of a ventral  laparoscopic, are only considered. The techniques of both


            hernia were prospectivelycollected from October 1995 and December  repairs have been described here.
            2005 are recorded .
                                                               Open Mesh Techniques

            Main outcome of the study:  Hernia recurrence andduration of hospital

            stay and morbidity. Postoperative complications of Claviengrade 2 or  Rives, Stoppa and Wantz popularized Open surgical technique
            more than grade 2 were considered as major complications.  After taking patients to operative theater and under general

            Results: Intraperitoneal onlay mesh surgery was performed in 233  anesthesia, endotracheal intubation and with close
            patients by open approach and in 127 patients by laparoscopic  monitoring operation was started. After painting and draping

            approach. Groups were similar for sex and body mass index and it is  of abdomen the incision was made according to the site and

            calculated by weight in kilograms divided by the height in meters  size of the hernia subcutaneous flap was raised up to 4 to 5 cm

            squared and the mean age for the laparoscopic group was 3 years  around the hernia and the hernial sac was found, contents was

            younger; and the mesh was selected larger for the laparoscopicgroup.  reduced sac was excised. The mesh is placed in the


            Mean follow-up for both laparoscopic and open groups was 30 and 36  intraperitoneally and fixation of the mesh done withinterrupted


            months; and the conversion rates are 4%. Majormorbidities were 15%

            in the open group and 7% in the laparoscopicgroup. Recurrence rates  sutures at minimum of two centimeters from the fascial edge.

            were 9% in the open group and 12% in the laparoscopic group.  Anterior rectus sheath closed over the mesh with a loop of

            Postoperative inpatient admission was more frequent after the open  polypropylene without tension, and then skin closed over the
            procedure than after the laparoscopic procedure (28% and 16%,  drain depending upon size and extension of the wound.
            respectively).
            Conclusions: Outcomes of the study shows not much difference with  Laparoscopic Repair of Ventral Hernia

            respect to recurrence rates after long-term follow-up; however, lower  Almost all types of Ventral Hernia can be operated by minimal

            rate ofmajor morbidity and increased outpatient-based procedure rates  access surgical techniques except if the size more than 10 cm
            favor laparoscopic repair in this study.
                                                               and it should be explained clearly to the patient that the
            INTRODUCTION                                       laparoscopic repair will not help cosmetically if the skin is very
                                                               lax and hanging loosely in the large hernia. In Laparoscopic
            More than 2 million abdominal surgery’s take place yearly in  Ventral Hernia Repair evacuation of urinary bladder in lower

            USA; with an estimated 3 to 20% of those patients develop  abdominal surgery and Nasogastric tube in upper abdominal

            ventral incisional hernia. With 90 000ventral incisional hernia  surgery  is necessary, because in most of the cases the access

            repairs are performed every year, the question of whether an  is through the palmar’s point which is about 2 to 3 cm below the
                                                             32
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34