Page 40 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 40

REVIEW ARTICLE                    Laparoscopic versus Intraoperative Ultrasound in the Diagnostic of Liver Tumors

            Laparoscopic versus Intraoperative Ultrasound

            in the Diagnostic of Liver Tumors


            María A Matamoros
            Director of the Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplant Center, Caja Costarricense del Seguro Social, San José, Costa Rica




              Abstract
              Introduction: Intraoperative ultrasound has become the gold standard complementary study to surgical decision making in liver surgery.
              In this review are analyze different variables to identified if laparoscopy ultrasound findings are equal or better than intraoperative
              ultrasound.
              Methods: A literature search was performed using Medline and Highwire Press data base. The following search terms were use:
              “laparoscopic ultrasonography”, “intraoperative ultrasonography” and “liver tumors”. 447 citations found in total. Criteria for selection of
              literature were number of cases (excluded if less than 20), Ultrasonography studies IOU and LU of different types of tumors:
              neuroendorcrine, HCC and colon metastasis were included, and method of analysis (statistical or nonstatistical).
              Results: The variables analyze in the studies selected were as follows: Method of patients selection, operative technique, operating time,
              irresectability, postoperative morbidity, number of new tumors missed by IOU or LIOU, surgical plan changed after IOU or LIUO and
              Hospital stay. Patient’s selection was based in patient having any type of liver tumor. Operative technique was performed in cases of
              IOU by conventional laparotomy, and in laparoscopy cases were use mainly 2 subcostal ports and the umbilical port. Operating time
              was estimated surgical prolongation of 30 minutes in the laparoscopy cases. Morbidity was lower in LIOU cases than in IOU. Lesions
              missed by LIOU and IOU, both methods showed a higher sensitivity in finding small lesions than other complementary diagnostic
              studies. Hospital stay was considerable shorter in LIOU.
              Conclusions: Laparoscopy ultrasound has demonstrated to be very useful in diagnostic of liver tumor lesions. Therefore, there is big
              room for the LIOU improved in diagnostic liver tumors. New and improved LIOU probes would very soon allow similar findings than IOU.
              Targeting laparoscopy to patients at high risk for unresectable disease requires consideration to avoid unnecessary laparotomy.
              Aim and objectives:  The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of laparoscopic ultrasonography (LU)  versus the open
              intraoperative ultrasonography.
              The following parameters were evaluated for both IOU and LIOU:
              1. Method of patients selection.
              2. Operative technique.
              3. Operating time.
              4. Intraoperative and postoperative complications.
              5. Postoperative morbidity.
              6. Number of new tumors missed by IOU or LIOU.
              7. Surgical plan changed after IOU or LIUO.
              8. Hospital stay.
              Material and methods: A literature search was performed using Medline and Highwire Press data base. The following search terms were
              use: “laparoscopic ultrasonography”, “intraoperative ultrasonography” and “liver tumors”. 447 citations found in total. Selected papers
              were screened for further references. Criteria for selection of literature were number of cases (excluded if less than 20), Ultrasonography
              studies IOU and LU of different types of tumors: Neuroendocrine, HCC and colon metastasis were included, and method of analysis
              (statistical or nonstatistical).
              Keywords: Laparoscopic ultrasound, diagnostic laparoscopy, laparoscopic tumor resection, laparoscopy for cancers.





            INTRODUCTION                                       or split liver and metastasectomy, metastatic survey, intrahepatic
                                                               biliary tree and vascular structures evaluation. Laparoscopy
            Intraoperative ultrasonography (IOU) has become the gold
            standard tool in liver surgery. Patients diagnosed with colon  ultrasound is not always available as it is the IOU probes because
            cancer approximately one fifth have occult metastases at the  not all the ultrasound scanners have adequate their probes to
            time of the presentation. It has been demonstrated the sensibility  use in laparoscopy. Since it became available, some centers
            of IOU in diagnosed liver tumors is high. IOU in combination  started to switch form the IOU to laparoscopy ultrasonography.
            with other radiological studies prior the surgery improved the  The development of dedicated linear array probes improve the
            diagnosed of the liver lesions. Nowadays IOU is use to perform  feasibility to have a good image and better contact with the
            tumor staging, metastatic survey, and guidance for whole organ  liver surface. Before, transluminal probes were used through

            World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, September-December 2009;2(3):43-46                         43
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45