Page 14 - WJOLS - Laparoscopic Journal
P. 14

WJOLS
                      Recent Advances in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Journey from Multiple Incision to Single Incision Hysterectomy
             REVIEW ARTICLE
            Recent Advances in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy:

            Journey from Multiple Incision to Single Incision

            Hysterectomy



            Sweta Tiwari
            Member World Association of Laparoscopic Surgeons, Consultant Gynecologist and Laparoscopic Surgeon, World Laparoscopy
            Hospital, Cyber City, DLF Phase II, Gurgaon, Haryana, India



              Abstract
              Four different approaches for hysterectomy are possible: through laparotomy; via the vagina; with the help of laparoscopy using several
              small incisions; and by single incision laparoscopic surgery. Currently, around 70 to 90% of hysterectomies are carried out via abdominal
              incision. This article compares the outcome of LAVH with SILS. In the SILS hysterectomy, only a single small incision in the belly button
              is created for insertion of the surgical instruments. The entire hysterectomy is performed using the SILS Port allows for the removal of the
              uterus through a small incision which measures only 20 mm. Compare to laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy recovery from the
              SILS hysterectomy is similar to the 2 weeks; however, laparoscopic hysterectomies may require multiple incisions which has less
              cosmetic value. Technological advances in SILS, including those in port structure, will enable gynecologists in future to employ strategies
              that effectively enhance instrument coordination and suturing. However; benefits of SILS to the patient need to be further documented
              prospectively before it can be recommended widely for every gynecologist to perform.
              Keywords: Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH), operative outcome in LH,
              pain, operative time in TLH, length of stay after hysterectomy.





            INTRODUCTION                                       School, Izmir, Turkey and first presented at—The Annual
            The benefits of surgical treatment of disease have always  Congress of Turkish Association of Paediatric Surgeons,
            been viewed as being obtained with a certain acceptable  October 2005. SILS has the advantage of improved
            level of pain and trauma to the patient. Minimizing this  cosmesis, ease of tissue retrieval, increased patient
            untoward effect of any surgical procedure has been a driving  acceptance (Figs 1 and 2). Whether it causes less pain or
            force of laparoscopy since its inception in the early 1900s. 1,2  early recovery needs further trials.
            Even with the clear benefits of laparoscopy over open  Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) refers to
                   3
            surgery,  we have continued to see a trend toward fewer  performing laparoscopy through a single incision. This
            invasions in the quest for “scarless” surgery.     approach is also referred to as single access surgery (SAS),
               Laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH)  single port surgery (SPS), single port access (SPA), single
            was first performed by Reich in the year 1989. It has been  port laparoscopy (SPL) and one port umbilical surgery
            implemented in hysterectomy procedures for uterine  (OPUS).
            myomas and adenomyomas. Three or four laparoscopic    SILS has several other advantages compared with
            ports are traditionally required to complete a LAVH. One  conventional multiple incision laparoscopic hysterectomy.
            port is inserted through the infraumbilical, and the other  First, operative complications related to trocar insertion such
            ports are usually inserted through the lateral abdominal wall  as epigastric vessel injury, operative wound infection, and
                                      4
            muscles, suprapubis, or both.  To minimize minimally  hematoma and visceral organ damage might be avoided by
            invasive surgical techniques such as LAVH, single-port-  reducing the number of ancillary ports penetrating abdominal
            access (SPA) laparoscopic surgery has been developed. 5-7  wall. In particular, bleeding from epigastric vessels is one
                                                               of the major complications after laparoscopic surgery.
            SILS AN EMERGING ALTERNATIVE                          Inferior epigastric vessels course cephalad from the
            FOR HYSTERECTOMY                                   external iliac vessels in the lateral third of the rectus
            SILS was first performed for the treatment of appendicitis  abdominis. Injury of these vessels occurs, when the
            at Department of Pediatric Surgery, Dokuz Eylul Medical  ancillary trocars were inserted through the lower quadrant

            World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, May-August 2010;3(2):67-74                                 67
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19