Page 28 - World's Most Popular Laparoscopic Journal
P. 28

Hydrosalpinx: Functional Surgery or Salpingectomy

          There had been reports about adverse effects associated  6. Marana R, Catalano GF, Muzii L, et al. The prognostic role of
          with salpingectomy, especially if performed close to the  salpingoscopy in laparoscopic tubal surgery. Hum Reprod
                                                                  1999;14:2991-95.
          uterus as it might disrupt the normal blood flow to the ovary  7. Surrey ES. Micro-endoscopy of the human fallopian tube. J Am
          resulting in fewer oocytes being retrieved from the side of  Gynecol Laparosc 1999;6:383-89.
          the operation during IVF cycles in comparison with intact  8. Vasquez G, Boecks W, Brosens I. Prospective study of tubal
                18
          adnexa.  NICE guidelines suggested that the evidence of  mucosal lesions and infertility in hydrosalpinges. Hum Reprod
                                                                  1995;10:1075-78.
          impairment of ovarian response in subsequent IVF was  9. Boer-Meisel ME, te Velde ER, Habbema JDF, Kardaun JWPF.
          inadequate but emphasize that laparoscopic salpingectomy  Predicting the pregnancy outcome in patients treated for
          should be done with care not to compromise ovarian blood  hydrosalpinx: A prospective study. Fertil Steril 1986;45:23-29.
          supply. 35                                          10. Dechaud H. Hydrosalpinges suitable for salpingectomy before
                                                                  IVF. Hum Reprod 2000;16(12):2464-65.
             Reconstructive tubal surgery should be preferred to  11. Aboulghar MA, Mansour RT, Serour GJ. Controversies in the
          salpingectomy in mild forms of tubal disease. 34,36,40,41  modern management of hydrosalpinx. Hum Reprod Update
          Preserved tubal mucosa indicates a good prognostic for  1998;4:882-90.
          tubal surgery. 34,36  The distinction of hydrosalpinges that  12. Puttemans PJ, Brosens IA. Salpingectomy improves in vitro
                                                                  ferilization outcome in patients with a hydrosalpinx; blind
          can be treated with functional surgery can be achieved by  victimization of fallopian tube. Hum Reprod 1996;11:2079-81.
                                            4,5
          utilization of tubal endoscopy tests.  Therefore, an  13. Coughlan C, Li T C. Surgical management of tubal disease. Obst
          appropriate mucosal assessment should be routine prior  gynaecol Reprod Med 2008;19(4):98-105.
          to deciding upon further management of hydrosalpinges. 11  14. Akande VA, Cahill DJ, Wardle PG, Rutherford AJ, Jenkins JM.
                                                                  The predictive value of the 'Hull and Rutherford' classification
          Fimbrioplasty should be performed in patients with mild  for tubal damage. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2004;111:123-41.
          periadnexal adhesions and patent hydrosalpinx mucosa as  15. Ahmad G, Watson AJ, Metwally M. Laparoscopy or
          this improves pregnancy outcomes. 35,36  Salpingostomy is  laparotomy for distal tubal surgery? A meta-analysis. Hum Fertil
                                                                  2007;10(1):43-47.
          an ideal procedure for mild hydrosalpinges with normal  16. Andersen AN, Meng FJ, Petersen. Low implantation rates after
          mucosa as it is associated with better pregnancy rates. 34  IVF in patients with hydrosalpinges diagnosed by
          Microsurgical tubocornual anastomosis is the standard   ultasonography. Hum Reprod 1994;9:1935-38.
                                              35
          treatment for proximal tubal occlusion.  This type of  17. Katz E, Akman MA, Damewood MD,  Garcia JE. Deleterious
          surgery is more effective than no treatment for women   effect of the presence of hydrosalpinx on implantation and
                                                                  pregnancy rates with in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril
          with mild hydrosalpinges and should be considered       1996;66:122-25.
          especially in centers where appropriate expertise is  18. Strandell A, Naldenstrom U, Nilsen L, Hamberger L.
          available. 35                                           Hydrosalpinx reduces in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer
                                                                  pregnancy rate. Hum Reprod 1994;9:861-63.
                                                              19. Vandrome J, Chasse E, Lejeline B, et al. Hydrosalpinges in
          CONCLUSION
                                                                  in vitro fertilization; an unfavourable prognostic feature. Hum
          Proper assessment of hydrosalpinges tubal mucosa utilizing  Reprod 1995;10:576-79.
          tubal endoscopy tests should be routine prior to decision  20. Bindirici I, Bukulmez O, Ensari A, Yarali H, and Gurgan T.
                                                                  A prospective evaluation of the effect of salpingectomy on
          about the choice of surgical treatment as this will prevent  endometrial receptivity in cases of women with communicating
          mis-management of patients.                             hydrosalpinges. Hum Reprod 2001;16(11):2422-26.
                                                              21. Mukherjee T, Copperman AB, McCaffrey C, et al. Hydrosalpinx
          REFERENCES                                              fluid has embryotoxic effect on murine embryogenesis: A case
                                                                  for prophylactic salpingectomy. Fertil Steril 1996;66:851-53.
            1. Bontis JN, Theodoridis TD. Laparoscopic management of  22. Akman MA, Erden HF, Bahaci M. Endometrial fluid visualized
              hydrosalpinx. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2007;1092:199-210.   through ultrasonography during ovarian stimulation in IVF cycles
            2. Puttemans P, Campo R, Gordts S, Brosens I. Hydrosalpinx-  impairs the outcome in tubal factor but not PCOS patients.
              functional surgery or salpingectomy. Hum Reprod 2000;15(7):  Hum Reprod 2005;20(4):906-09.
              1427-30.                                        23. Pandian Z, Akande V A, Harrild K, Bhattacharya S. Surgery for
            3. Dechaud H, Daures JP, Hedon B. Prospective evaluation of  tubal infertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;1:1-12.
              falloposcopy. Hum Reprod 1998b;13:1815-18.      24. Posaci C, Camus M, Osmanagoaglu K, Devroey P. Tubal surgery
            4. Puttemans P, Brosens L, Delattin P, et al. Salpingoscopy versus  in the era of ART: clinical options. Hum Reprod 1999;14: 120-
              hysterosalpingography in hydrosalpinges. Hum Reprod  36.
              1987;2:535-40.                                  25. Johnson N, van Voorst S, Sowter MC, Strandell A, Mol BW.
            5. Valentini AL, Muzii L, Marana R, Catalano GF, Felici F,  Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo in
              Destito C, Marano P. Fallopian tube disease: The cobblestone  vitro fertilisation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;20(1):
              pattern as a radiographic sign. Radiol 2000;217:521-25.  CD002125.

          World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, September-December 2010;3(3):145-150                      149
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33