Page 38 - Laparoscopic Surgery Online Journal
P. 38

Mohammed Khairy Ali et al

          field including cancer. Robotic surgery is considered as a  15. Beste TM, Nelson KH, Daucher JA. Total laparoscopic hysterec-
                                                                  tomy utilizing a robotic surgical system. JSLS 2005; 9(1):13-15.
          solution for the technical problems of MIS. However, the
                                                              16. Boggess JF, et al. A comparative study of 3 surgical methods
          economic feasibility of robotic surgery still remains as an  for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic
          obstacle which should be overcomed. It is expected with  assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;
          further development of robotic technology and the Da Vinci  199(4):360 e1-9.
                                                              17. Brenot K, Goyert GL. Impact of robotic surgery on obstetric-
          robotic platform, the concept of high cost will be resolved.
                                                                  gynecologic resident training. J Reprod Med 2009;54(11-12):
          Robotic surgery has many advantages like 3D vision with  675-677.
          high-definition vision system; increase the dexterity of the  18. Degueldre M, et al. Robotically assisted laparoscopic micro-
          surgeon and his ability to perform delicate operations, and  surgical tubal reanastomosis: A feasibility study. Fertil Steril
                                                                  2000;74(5):1020-1023.
          comfortable positioning for the surgeon while performing
                                                              19. Elliott DS, Chow GK, Gettman M. Current status of robotics in
          surgical procedures because the surgeon sits on robotic  female urology and gynecology. World J Urol 2006;24(2):
          console away from the patient. However, there are some  188-192.
          disadvantages to the robotic surgery like high cost, the large  20. Falcone T. Laparoscopic surgery. Foreword. Clin Obstet Gynecol
                                                                  2009;52(3):303.
          size of the robot set up, and there is no tactile feedback
                                                              21. Fanning J, et al. Robotic radical hysterectomy. Minerva Ginecol
          during operation. But with the future, the robotic surgery  2009;61(1):53-55.
          will be progressing and its disadvantages will be resolved  22. Hoekstra AV, et al. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology:
          with the time.                                          impact on fellowship training. Gynecol Oncol 2009;114(2):
                                                                  168-172.
                                                              23. Goldberg JM, Falcone T. Laparoscopic microsurgical tubal
          REFERENCES                                              anastomosis with and without robotic assistance. Hum Reprod
                                                                  2003;18(1):145-147.
            1. Ayala Yanez R, Olaya Guzman EJ, Haghenbeck Altamirano FJ.
                                                              24. Holloway RW, Patel SD, Ahmad S. Robotic surgery in
               Robotics in gynecology. Background, feasibility and applicability.
                                                                  gynecology. Scand J Surg 2009;98(2):96-109.
               Ginecol Obstet Mex 2012;80(6):409-416.
                                                              25. Holub Z. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynecology:
            2. Al-Badawi IA, Al-Aker M, Tulandi T. Robotic-assisted
                                                                  scientific dream or reality? Ceska Gynekol 2007;72(1):3-4.
               salpingostomy for ectopic pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can
                                                              26. Escobar PF, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site
               2010;32(7):627-628.
                                                                  surgery in gynecology: initial report and technique. J Minim
            3. Bandera CA, Magrina JF. Robotic surgery in gynecologic
                                                                  Invasive Gynecol 2009;16(5):589-591.
               oncology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2009;21(1):25-30.
                                                              27. Sanchez-Salas R, et al. Laparoendoscopic single site in pelvic
            4. Bocca S, Stadtmauer L, Oehninger S. Current status of robotically
                                                                  surgery. Indian J Urol 2010;28(1):54-59.
               assisted laparoscopic surgery in reproductive medicine and
                                                              28. Lue JR, Murray B, Bush S. Single port robotic hysterectomy
               gynecology. Reprod Biomed Online 2007;14(6):765-772.
                                                                  technique improving on multiport procedure. J Minim Access
            5. Nezhat C, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in
                                                                  Surg 2010;8(4):156-157.
               gynecology: scientific dream or reality? Fertil Steril 2009;91(6):
                                                              29. Mencaglia L, et al. Single port entry: are there any advantages?
               2620-2622.
                                                                  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2013 Jun;27(3):441-455.
            6. Mettler L, et al. Robotic assistance in gynecological oncology.
                                                              30. Magrina JF, Kho R, Magtibay PM. Robotic radical hysterectomy:
               Curr Opin Oncol 2008;20(5):581-589.
                                                                  technical aspects. Gynecol Oncol 2009;113(1):28-31.
            7. Lenihan JP Jr, Kovanda C, Seshadri-Kreaden U. What is the
               learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery? J Minim
               Invasive Gynecol 2008;15(5):589-594.           ABOUT THE AUTHORS
            8. Jung YW, Kim SW, Kim YT. Recent advances of robotic surgery
                                                              Mohammed Khairy Ali (Corresponding Author)
               and single port laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology. J Gynecol
               Oncol 2009;20(3):137-144.                      Assistant Lecturer, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
            9. Chen CC, Falcone T. Robotic gynecologic surgery: past, present  Woman’s Health Center, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt, Phone:
               and future. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2009;52(3):335-343.  +208824621, 201005537951, e-mail: mohammedelkosy@yahoo.com
           10. Bartos P, et al. (Da vinci robotic surgery in gynaecological
               oncology: a critical interim appraisal). Ceska Gynekol 2007;  Ahmed Y Abdelbadee
               72(5):354-359.
                                                              Assistant Lecturer, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
           11. Schreuder HW, Verheijen RH. Robotic surgery. BJOG 2009;
                                                              Woman’s Center Hospital, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
               116(2):198-213.
           12. Advincula AP. Robotic surgery in gynecology. Foreword. Clin  Sherif A Shazly
               Obstet Gynecol 2011;54(3):373-375.
           13. Behera MA, et al. Cost analysis of abdominal, laparoscopic and  Assistant Lecturer, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
                                                              Woman’s Health Center, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
               robotic-assisted myomectomies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol
               2012;19(1):52-57.
                                                              Ahmed M Abbas
           14. Bell MC, et al. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial
               cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy  Assistant Lecturer, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
               and robotic techniques. Gynecol Oncol 2008;111(3):407-411.  Woman’s Health Center, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
          162
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43