Page 12 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 12

Nuhu Musa Mshelia et al
          under vision in the left lower and right upper quadrants
          (Figs 2 to 4) for dissection and holding the appendix respec-
          tively are done. The appendix is identified and lifted at the
          tip with a grasper from the right port (Fig. 5). Adhesions
          were freed and mesoappendix is cauterized with a bipolar
          diathermy closed to the appendix and cut with scissor
          this continued till the base of the appendix is reached.
          A pre tied Meltzer’s knot is applied to ligate the base
          (Fig. 6) and is tightened with the use of a knot pusher.
          Similar knotting is done at about 10 mm from the base
          knot. The appendix is severed and the area is sucked.
          Review of the peritoneum is done before the appendix
          is extracted, hidden in the cannula. The umbilical port        Fig. 2: Entry of the peritoneal cavity
          site is closed with vicryl suture (Fig. 7).
             All the patients are followed up in the surgical out-
          patient department after discharge from hospital stay.
          They are examined after subjective assessment of the
          port sites (Fig. 8) and remarkably, non-had infection. They
          expressed satisfaction of the procedure.
             Data extracted on time taken to operate, recover,
          hospital stay, and pain perception was analyzed using
          Microsoft Excel 2010.


          RESuLTS
          Summary of values obtained is as follows:

                                                     2
           S. no.  Parameters            Mean       c
           1.    Operative time in minutes  34.2    12.10               Fig. 3: Insertion of ports under vision
           2.    Recovery time in minutes  181      36.15
           3.    Pain perception (VAS)   2.55       1.96
           4.    Hospital stay in hours   22.1      4.00

          dISCuSSION

          There is general acceptance of laparoscopic appendic ec -
          tomy worldwide however, still disputed to be a gold
                                  9
          standard in appendectomy.  The development of laparo-
          scopy surgery is slow in Nigeria compared to other









                                                                             Fig. 4: Ports are in place
                                                              developing nations like India. From reports of successes
                                                              recorded across the globe, it is encouraging to dedi-
                                                              cated resources to establish the services efficiently in our
                                                              institutions of learning.
                                                                 The uses of laparoscopy has been long by the
                                                              department of obstetrics and gynecology for the purpose
                   Fig. 1: Positions of the team and monitor  of investigating infertility until recently we had a visiting


          112
   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17