Page 15 - Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery

WJOLS

Two Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy—An Initial Experience of 25 Cases with a New Technique
need of additional ports. However, traction sutures on REFERENCES
gallbladder may end up in tearing of the organ leading 1. Bordelon BM, Hobday KA, Hunter JG. Incision extension
to stone spillage and associated consequences like an is the optimal method of difficult gallbladder extraction at
abscess, fistula formation and other septic complications laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 1992 Sep-Oct;
4-7
later on. This possibility further increases in patients 6(5):225-227.
with a high stone burden. So, we aim at the gentle han- 2. Shimura T, Suehiro T, Suzuki H, Mochida Y, Okada K, Araki
dling of the gallbladder and take preventive steps to avoid K, Kuwano H. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a novel
intra-operative spillage and hence do not use sutures for two-port technique for surgical residency training. Int Surg.
2009 Apr-Jun;94(2):149-153.
8,9
traction. However, the present technique requires no 3. Poon CM, Chan KW, Lee DW, Chan KC, Ko CW, Cheung
special instrument or complex technique. HY, et al. Two-port versus four-port laparoscopic chole-
Although the present technique is safe, there are some cystectomy. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional
inherent limitations. This should not be used for cases Techniques. 2003 Oct 1;17(10):1624-1627.
where technical difficulty is anticipated or encountered 4. Hougård K, Bergenfeldt M. Abdominal fistula 7 years after
for example in acute cholecystitis, empyema, dense laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ugeskrift for laeger. 2008
Sep;170(36):2803.
adhesions in Calot’s triangle, intrahepatic gallbladder, 5. Arishi AR, Rabie ME, Khan MS, Sumaili H, Shaabi H, Michael
anatomic abnormality in the hepato-biliary system, Mir- NT, et al. Spilled gallstones: the source of an enigma. JSLS:
rizzi’s syndrome, cirrhosis of the liver, etc. Drain inser- Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. 2008
tion in the subcostal region nullifies all the purported Jul;12(3):321-325.
advantages of the procedure. Hence, it is better to perform 6. Bhati CS, Tamijmarane A, Bramhall SR. A tale of three spilled
a feasibility assessment before attempting this two port gall stones: one liver mass and two abscesses. Dig Surg.
2006;23(3):198-200.
technique, and difficult cases should routinely be done in 7. Patterson EJ, Nagy AG. Don’t cry over spilled stones? Com-
four port fashion. If there is bleeding during the proce- plications of gallstones spilled during laparoscopic cholecys-
dure, a low threshold should be maintained to convert to tectomy: case report and literature review. Can J Surg. 1997
the standard four-port technique. Meticulous dissection Aug;40(4):300-304.
and gentle handling of instruments are a sine qua non 8. Waqar SH, Shah SF, Khan IA, Ch TS, Abdullah MT, Malik
for safe and successful completion of the procedure. One ZI, et al. Two-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy–a new tech-
should not expect the freedom of a four-port technique nique. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2008 Oct- Dec;20(4):167-
168.
in this method. With careful case selection coupled with 9. Sathesh-Kumar T, Saklani AP, Vinayagam R, Blackett RL.
precise technique and patience, one can make this two- Spilled gall stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a
port laparoscopic cholecystectomy an amazing reality in review of the literature. Postgraduate medical journal. 2004
one’s surgical practice. Feb 1;80(940):77-79.

World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, May-August 2018;11(2):64-67 67