Page 36 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 36

Preoperative Scoring System to Predict Difficult LC
               Advancing age, ethnic background, family history, female
            gender, and or genetics are some risk factors for cholelithiasis
            which cannot be modified. The risks which can be modified for
            gallstones are an idle lifestyle, sudden weight loss, and obesity. A
            rise in gallstone frequency is expected with the rising epidemic
            of obesity and its associated metabolic syndrome. Drugs such
            as thiazide diuretics, ceftriaxone, octreotide, pregnancy, total
            parenteral nutrition, and fasting are some of the risk factors
            for biliary sludge. Chronic hemolysis, cirrhosis, and Crohn’s
            disease are a few risk factors for the formation of black pigment
            stones. 10
               The first cholecystectomy was performed on a patient who
            suffered from cholelithiasis by Carl Johann August Langenbuch, who
            pioneered Cholecystectomy in 1882. It has since been considered
            the surgery of choice for gallstone disease (cholelithiasis). The
            gold standard for treatment of most of the gallbladder diseases
            is considered to be LC. Shorter duration of hospital stay, less
            postoperative pain, faster return of bowel function, better cosmesis,
            and also quicker return to full activity are some of the advantages
            of LC.
               Although LC is the gold standard, there are instances of
            LC, when the surgery becomes difficult. There are instances of
            surgery taking a longer than expected duration with bile/stone
            spillage, iatrogenic injury of common bile/hepatic duct, and
            thickly adherent gallbladder, and occasionally some surgeries
            require conversion to open cholecystectomy (OC). Predicting   Fig. 1: Preoperative scoring system with the various parameters and
            preoperatively, the degree of difficulty of surgery is a nigh   their respective scores
            impossible task with many confounding factors. There is no
            standardized and widely recognized scoring system available to   Clinical
            predict the difficulty of LC preoperatively at present. In my study,   •  Abdominal scar infraumbilical or supraumbilical
            we have attempted to devise a scoring system for predicting the   •  Palpable gallbladder
            difficulty in LC preoperatively using easily available parameters and   •  BMI
            correlating the same with our observed intraoperative findings and
            difficulty encountered. My study attempts to recognize the factors   Imaging
            which help to predict increased difficulty in LC, and thus surgical   •  Pericholecystic collection.
            complications can be predicted and necessary precautions taken   •  Impacted stone.
            or altogether prevented.                           •  Gallbladder wall thickness.
                                                               •  These factors were selected based on the previous studies and
                                                                  their respective association with LC (Fig. 1). 12,13
            PreoPerAtIve PredIctIve FActors
            In our study, the preoperative degree of difficulty is assessed by   Following evaluation, the patient will be subjected to LC. Factors
                                                               noted are given as follows:
            taking the following factors into consideration, and it is compared
            with our intraoperative observations and experiences. Patients   •  Biliary/stone spillage.
            with gallstone disease confirmed on ultrasound scan will be posted   •  Operative time taken incision to port closure.
            for LC. The following patient factors are evaluated preoperatively:   •  Injury to duct/artery.
            History – History of previous hospitalization for cholecystitis, sex,   •  Bleeding during surgery.
            and age; Clinical findings – Palpable gallbladder, abdominal scar,   •  Placement of drain.
            and BMI; Sonology findings – wall thickness, impacted stone, and   •  Need for conversion regarding upon the difficulty of the case.
            pericholecystic collection.                        Accordingly the cases are classified into one of the following
               In a study conducted by Mittalgodu Anantha Krishna et al. at   categories:
            Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Mangaluru, which
            tried to establish a predictive scoring method for difficult LC, they   Easy
            used a number of USG, preoperative and intraoperative parameters   •  Time taken is <60 min
            analyzed against the endpoint of difficult LC. Our study uses far   •  No injury to duct, artery
            fewer parameters and aims for similar results. 11  •  No bile spillage

            History                                            Difficult
            •  H/o previous hospitalization (abdominal surgeries/cholecystitis/  •  Time taken is 60–120 min
              pancreatitis)                                    •  Injury to duct
            •  Age                                             •  Bile/stone spillage
            •  Sex                                             •  No conversion

            132   World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, Volume 15 Issue 2 (May–August 2022)
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41