Page 37 - tmp

Incidental CaGB in Operated Cases of Gallstone Disease
Other Demographic Profiles Table 4: Age comparison in CaGB vs chronic cholecystitis patients
• Among incidental CaGB patients, 40% were male and 60% were (N = 200)
female; 29.74% of chronic cholecystitis patients were male and Cases
70.1% were female (Table 6). Valid Missing Total
• Regarding incidental CaGB patients, 40% were doing desk job, Diagnosis N % N % N %
60% were housewives.
• Among chronic cholecystitis patients, 19.48% were doing desk job, Age CaGB 5 100.0 0 0.0 5 100.0
9.2% were retired persons, and 66.66% were housewives (Table 6). Chronic 195 100.0 0 0.0 195 100.0
• In total, 40% of incidental CaGB patients lived in rural area and cholecystitis
60% in urban area; 69.23% of chronic cholecystitis patients lived
in rural area and 30.77% in urban area (Table 6).
• Table 7 shows statistical tests for demographic profiles in CaGB Table 5: Age distribution in CaGB vs chronic cholecystitis patients
vs chronic cholecystitis patients. (N = 200)
Age CaGB (N = 5) Chronic cholecystitis (N = 195)
Minimum age 30 6
Maximum age 76 78
Median age 36 44

Table 6: Demographic profiles in CaGB vs chronic cholecystitis patients
(N = 200)
Incidental Chronic cholecystitis Total
CaGB (n = 5) (n = 195) (n = 200)
Case profile No. % No. % No. %
Sex: male 2 40 58 29.74 60 30
Sex: female 3 60 137 70.16 140 70
Occupation: desk 2 40 38 19.48 40 20
job
Occupation: 0 0 18 9.2 18 9
retired person
Fig. 2: Bar graph showing histopathology examination findings of our Occupation: 3 60 130 69.23 133 66.5
study group (N = 200)
housewife
Table 3: Frequency of CaGB patients in study group (N = 200) Rural 2 40 135 69.23 137 68.5
Frequency % Valid % Cumulative % Urban 3 60 60 30.77 63 31.5
Valid
CaGB 5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Table 7: Statistical tests for demographic profiles in CaGB vs chronic
Chronic 195 97.5 97.5 100.0 cholecystitis patients
cholecystitis Parameter p value Test Comment
Total 200 100.0 100.0 Sex: male/female 0.63 # Fisher’s Exact test * Not significant
Occupation 0.98 Do Do
housewife—others
Rural/urban 0.37 Do Do
*
# Fisher exact test used. p <0.05 significant

Patient’s History
After cross-tabulation, the following results were obtained. Table 8
shows symptom comparison in CaGB vs chronic cholecystitis
patients as mentioned as follows:
• Among five CaGB patients, four (80%) had upper abdominal pain
and one (20%) had no pain. Among 195 chronic cholecystitis
patients, 149 (76.02%) patients had upper abdominal pain.
• Forty percent of incidental CaGB patients had nausea and 60%
had no nausea.
• Among chronic cholecystitis patients, 38.46% had nausea.
• Among incidental CaGB patients, 20% had vomiting, 80% had
Fig. 3: Bar graph showing frequency of CaGB patients in study group no vomiting. Among chronic cholecystitis patients, 17.43% had
(N = 200) vomiting.

World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, Volume 14 Issue 3 (September–December 2021) 179