Page 39 - tmp
P. 39

Incidental CaGB in Operated Cases of Gallstone Disease
             Table 10: Comparison of incidence rate of incidental CaGB by various   and almost half of these were first diagnosed on HPE of resected
             authors                                           specimen, thereby highlighting the elusive nature of EGBC. 20,21
                             Number of      Total    Incidence    All patients diagnosed with incidental CaGB were subsequently
              Studies       incidental CaGB  cholecystectomy  rate (%)  underwent staging work up with contrast enhanced CT abdomen
                   5
              Daphna et al.      6          1697       0.3     and tumor markers. They were discussed among a team of surgical
                  6
              Tantia  et al.    19          3205       0.6     oncologist, GI surgeon, pathologist, radiologist, and radiation
                                                               oncologist. They were managed as per consensus, which could
                  7
              Mittal  et al.    13          1305       0.9     be a second operation like completion cholecystectomy, or
                   8
              Morera  et al.     4           372       1.1     chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, palliative biliary drainage by
                     9
              Amanullah  et al.  8           428       1.9     ERCP, PTBD, or best supportive care at home.
                   10
              Shigeki  et al.    4           84        4.7        It was also noted that among the incidental CaGB patients, four
              Present study      5           200       2.5     patients had laparoscopic cholecystectomy in which there are more
                                                               chances of biliary spillage. Thus, possibility of the very early disease
                                                               becoming a disseminated disease.
            Table 11: Comparison of clinical symptoms of GBC by various authors
                                                Weight  Nausea/  conclusIon
            Series          Pain  Anorexia Jaundice  loss  vomiting  •  In our study, the incidence of incidental CaGB was 2.5%.
            Piehler and     76%    34%    38%    39%    32%    •  Unfortunately, no clinical, biochemical, or radiological
            Crichlow                                              parameters were suggestive or predictive of CaGB in patients
            Shieh et al. 11  60.4%  43.7%  35.4%  33.3%  35.4%    who underwent cholecystectomy for gallstone disease.
            Al-Hadeedi et al. 12  47.3%  39.4%  36.4%     39.4%  10.5%  •  Further analysis revealed incidental CaGB was predominantly a
            Shukla et al.   85%    40%    60.3%  14.9%  24.7%     disease of elderly female patients. The mean age was 45.4 years
            Klamer and Max 13  70%  —     40%    40%    30%       and 60% of incidental CaGB cases were female.
            Silk et al. 14  78.5%  35.6%  28.5%  45.7%     35.6%  •  In view of the findings from this study, it may be concluded that
                                                                  chronic cholecystitis remains a significant surgical entity in our
            Perpetuo et al. 15  97%  —    44%    77%    64%       population. However, the suspicion of incidental CaGB should
            Kelly and       74%     —     32%    48%    51%       be borne in mind.
            Chamberlain 16                                     •  This is important as laparoscopic cholecystectomy is being
            Chao et al. 17    81.1%    4.1%  32.4%    1.4%  16.2%  increasingly used for the treatment of chronic cholecystitis.
            White et al. 18  83%    —     47%    70%     —        Also, if there is perioperative spillage of biliary contents, there is
            Chao and       54.1%  18.9%   45%    28.4%  18.9%     a possibility of the very early disease becoming a disseminated
            Greager 19                                            disease. The operating surgeon should have high index of
                                                                  suspicion regarding this not so uncommon and uniformly fatal
                                                                  GI malignancy.
               No suggestive parameter of incidental CaGB could obtain from
            this comparison. Other parameters were also compared, but no result
            obtained. Only intraoperative findings are suggestive of CaGB in a   orcId
            few cases. These findings include adhesions, thickening, irregularity   Rahul Omprakash Paliwal   https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0654-9419
            of GB wall, and disappearance of shiny appearance of gallbladder.
               The following parameters of incidental CaGB were compared   references
            with chronic cholecystitis patients: Among incidental CaGB patients,
            mean age was 49.11 years, median age was 47 years, minimum age     1.  Shukla VK, Khandelwal C, Roy SK, et al. Primary carcinoma of the gall
                                                                    bladder: a review of a 16-year period at the University Hospital. J Surg
            was 30 years, and maximum age was 76 years. Among incidental   Oncol 1985;28(1):32–35. DOI: 10.1002/jso.2930280109.
            CaGB cases (n = 5), male patients were 40% and female patients     2.  Collier NA, Carr D, Hemingway A, et al. Preoperative diagnosis and its
            were 60%. Among incidental CaGB patients, 40% were doing desk   effect on the treatment of carcinoma of the gallbladder. Surg Gynecol
            job, and 60% were housewives. Among incidental CaGB patients,   Obstet 1984;159(5):465–470. PMID: 6208626.
            40% were living in urban area and 60% were living in rural area.     3.  Kapoor VK. Incidental gallbladder cancer. Am J Gastroenterol
            Among incidental CaGB patients, 80% had pain abdomen and 20%   2001;96(3):627–629. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03597.x.
            had no pain. Among incidental CaGB patients, 40% had nausea and     4.  Piehler JM, Crichlow RW. Primary carcinoma of the gallbladder. Surg
                                                                    Gynecol Obstet 1978;147(6):929–942. PMID: 362580.
            20% had vomiting. Among incidental CaGB patients, 0% had weight     5.  Weinstein D, Herbert M, Bendet N, et al. Incidental finding of gallbladder
            loss. Among incidental CaGB patients, 100% had no jaundice. USG   carcinoma. Isr Med Assoc J 2002;4(5):334–336. PMID: 12040819.
            was normal (i.e.: only suggestive of chronic cholecystitis) in 100%     6.  Tantia O, Jain M, Khanna S, et al. Incidental carcinoma gall bladder
            of incidental CaGB cases.                               during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gall stone
               No clinical, biochemical, or radiological parameters were found   disease. Surg Endosc 2009;23(9):2041–2046. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-
            as preoperative predictor of CaGB in patients who underwent   008-9950-8. PMID: 18443860.
            cholecystectomy for chronic cholecystitis.            7.  Mittal R, Jesudason MR, Nayak S. Selective histopathology in
               There are no characteristic clinical features of EGBC. Unfortunately,   cholecystectomy for gallstone disease. Indian J Gastroenterol
                                                                    2010;29(1):26–30. DOI: 10.1007/s12664-010-0005-4.
            it becomes clinically apparent only when it is locally advanced; the     8.  Morera Ocón FJ, Ballestín Vicente J, Ripoll Orts F, et al. Cáncer
            symptoms being due to invasion of neighboring organs. In two   de vesícula biliar en un hospital comarcal [Gallbladder cancer
            series, both from areas with a high incidence of GBC, where the index   in a regional hospital]. Cir Esp 2009;86(4):219–223. DOI: 10.1016/
            of suspicion was high, none of the EGBC was diagnosed clinically   j.ciresp.2009.02.021.

                                                 World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, Volume 14 Issue 3 (September–December 2021)  181
   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44