Page 11 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 11

Efficacy and Safety of Electrothermal Bipolar Vessel Sealer vs ENSEAL in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Large Uterus
            reusable hand instruments. With adequate training and proper     5.  Garry R, Fountain J, Brown J, Manca A, Mason S, Sculpher M, et al.
            technique, these devices can also be used in TLH even in an enlarged   EVALUATE hysterectomy trial: a multicentre randomised trial comparing
            uterus. Thus patients could benefit from all the advantages of   abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic methods of hysterectomy. Health
            minimally invasive surgery.                             Technol Assess 2004;8(26):1–154. DOI: 10.3310/hta8260.
                                                                 6.  Phipps JH. Thermometry studies with bipolar diathermy during
                                                                    hysterectomy. Gynaecol Endosc 1994;3:5–7.
            conclusIon                                            7.  Aytan H, Nazik H, Narin R, Api M, Tok EC. Comparison of the use of
            Laparoscopic hysterectomy is a safer alternative to open   LigaSure, Halo PKS cutting forceps and ENSEAL tissue sealer in total
            hysterectomy even in a large uterus. The ALAN vessel sealer is   laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized trial. J Minim Invasive
                                                                    Gynecol 2014;21(4):650–655. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.01.010.
            comparably safe and as efficient as ENSEAL. It is more cost-effective     8.  Bicer M, Guner Z, Karas C, Guclu A, Gol M. Using LigaSure vessel
            with its reusable hand instruments; hence, could be a promising   sealing device in the large uterus at laparoscopic hysterectomy. Clin
            instrument for patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy in   Exp Obstet Gynecol 2016;43(6):880–882. PMID: 29944243.
            developing countries like India.                     9.  Aykan YB, Karadag B, Mulayim B. Comparison of the efficacy
                                                                    and safety of two advanced vessel sealing technologies in total
                                                                    laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2019;45(11):2220–
            ethIcAl ApprovAl                                        2227. DOI: 10.1111/jog.14096.
            Institutional ethics committee approval has been taken.    10.  Kondo W, Bourdel N, Marengo F, Botchorishvili R, Pouly JL, Jardon K, et al.
                                                                    Is laparoscopic hysterectomy feasible for uteri larger than 1000 g?
                                                                    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011;158(1):76–81. DOI: 10.1016/
            references                                              j.ejogrb.2011.03.027.
              1.  Sinha R, Sundaram M, Lakhotia S, Mahajan C, Manaktala G, Shah P.     11.  Glaser LM, Milad MP. Bowel and bladder injury repair and follow-up
                Total laparoscopic hysterectomy for large uterus. J Gynecol Endosc   after gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2019;133(2):313–322. DOI:
                Surg 2009;1(1):34–39. DOI: 10.4103/0974-1216.51908.  10.1097/AOG.0000000000003067.
              2.  Uccella S, Cromi A, Serati M, Casarin J, Sturla D, Ghezzi F. Laparoscopic     12.  Paul PG,  Panditrao AS, Khan S, Talwar P, Kaur H,  Barsagade S.
                hysterectomy in case of uteri weighing ≥1 kilogram: a series of   Secondary hemorrhage after different modes of hysterectomy.
                71 cases and review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol   Gynecol Surg 2013;10:267–272. DOI: 10.1007/s10397-013-0811-7.
                2014;21(3):460–465. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.08.706.    13.  Paul PG, Prathap T, Kaur H, Shabnam K, Kandhari D, Chopade G.
              3.  Rothmund  R, Kraemer B,  Bricker S, Taran FA, Wallwiener M,     Secondary hemorrhage after total laparoscopic hysterectomy. JSLS
                Zubke A, et al. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy using   2014;18(3):e2014.00139. DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00139.
                ENSEAL vs standard bipolar coagulation technique: randomized     14.  Hur HC, Guido RS, Mansuria SM, Hacker MR, Sanfilippo JS, Lee TT.
                controlled trial. JMIG 2013;20(5):661–666. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.   Incidence and patient characteristics of vaginal cuff dehiscence
                04.014.                                             after different modes of hysterectomies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol
              4.  Hasanov M, Denschlag D, Seemann E, Gitsch G, Woll J, Klar M.   2007;14:311–317. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2006.11.005.
                Bipolar vessel-sealing devices in laparoscopic hysterectomies: a     15.  Katherine OH, McCutcheon SP, McCutcheon JG. Laparoscopic
                multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet   hysterectomy: impact of uterine size.  J Minim Invasive Gynecol
                2018;297(2):409–414. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-017-4599-y.  2011;18(1):85–91. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.09.016.








































                                                       World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, Volume 14 Issue 1 (January–April 2021)  9
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16