Page 6 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 6
Rooh-ul-Muqim et al
23
dissection or adhesiolysis and they often remain undetected in a study from a single center by Vagenas K et al. Inspite of
5
during operations. There was only one (0.28%) case of bowel the above mentioned complications the overall outcome was
injury in our study and it was recognized postoperatively when satisfactory, with better patient acceptance of the procedure.
the patient developed abdominal distension, rigidity and had a
toxic look. She was initially treated conservatively but CONCLUSIONS
laparotomy was performed on the 3rd day, where a perforation LC is one of the most frequently performed laparoscopic
in ileum with edematous gut covered with slough was found. operations. It has a low rate of mortality and morbidity. LC is a
So resection of affected segment with end to end anastomosis safe and effective procedure in almost all patients presenting
was performed. Intestinal ischemia and small bowel evisceration with cholelithiasis. Most of the complications are due to lack of
after LC have also been reported. 20,21 Bowel injury can be experience or knowledge of typical error.
prevented by trocar placement under direct vision and A rational selection of patients and proper preoperative
inspection of abdomen before withdrawing laparoscope. 5 work up as well as knowledge of possible complications, a low
In our study LC was converted to open surgery in 11(3.13%)
patients. In 3 cases the gallbladder was adherent, 5 cases of threshold for conversion, in combination with adequate training
makes this operation a safe procedure with favorable results.
vascular injury during LC where bleeding could not be controlled
with routine methods, and in 3 cases with disturbed anatomy, REFERENCES
Tayab M et al, in their study identified two preoperative risk
factors for conversion, ultrasonographic signs of inflammation 1. Ros A, Carlsson P, Rahmqvist M, Bachman K, Nilsson E.
22
and age more than 60 years. Al Salamah, has reported Nonrandomized patients in a cholecystectomy trial:
disturbed anatomy in the region of callot’s triangle as the most characteristics, procedure, and outcomes. BMC Surge 2006;6:17.
common cause of conversion observed in 41.5% of converted 2. Ji W, Li LT, Li JS. Role of Laparoscopic subtotal chole-
cases while male gender, age over 65 years, high leukocytes cystectomy in the treatment of complicated cholecystitis.
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2006;5(4):584-9.
count, gallbladder wall thickness more than 4 mm on USG were 3. Hobbs MS, Mai Q, Knuimam MW, et al. Surgeon experience
observed as the most significant determinants for conversion and trends in intraoperative complications in laparoscopic
7
to open procedure. A conversion rate of 1.88% has been cholecystectomy. BJS 2006;93;844-53.
reported in a series of 1220 patients from a single center. 23 4. Hasl DM, Ruiz OR, Baumert J, Gerace C, et al. A prospective
Bile duct injury during LC is a dreaded complication and study of bile leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg
may lead to post LC benign biliary strictures after few months, Endosc 2001;15:1299-1300.
increasing the morbidity and mortality related to the procedure. 24 5. Shamiyeh A, Wanyand W. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: early
Late postoperative strictures are usually the result of biliary and late complication and their treatment, Langenbecks arch.
reconstruction for injuries after cholecystectomy or excessive Surg 2004;389:164-17.
25
use of electrocautery near CBD. CBD stricture occurred in 6. Cawich SO, Mitchell DI, Newnham MS, Arthurs M. A
5(1.42%) of our cases. ERCP was done in these cases, in 2 cases comparison of open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy done by
a surgeon in training. West Indian Med J 2006;55(2):103-9.
surgical repair with Roux-en-Y Hepaticojejunostomy was done 7. Al-Salamah SM. Out come of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in
with good results. Three cases were lost to follow up, probably acute cholecystitis. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2005;15(7):400-
went to higher center for treatment. 3.
Other minor complications in our study were Port–site hernia 8. Chau CH, Siu WT, Tang CN, Ha PY, et al. Laparoscopic
in 3 cases, 1 at epigastric site and 2 at umbilical port site. Repair cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: the evolving trend in
was done at an interval of 4-6 months. Holes greater than 5 mm an institution. Asian J Surg 2006;29(3):120-4.
diameter should be closed at facial level and also removal of 9. Curro G, Lapichino G, Lorenzini C, Palmeri R, Cucinotta E.
gallbladder from epigastric hole is important to prevent Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children with chronic
enlargement of umbilical port. 21 hemolytic anemia. Is the outcome related to the timing of the
Mortality was fortunately low in our series with only 2 cases procedure? Surg Endosc 2006;20(2):252-5.
(0.56%). Both were females and high risk patients with multiple 10. Lee KW, Poon CM, Leung KF, Lee DW, Ko CW. Two Port
organ disease. One of them developed cardiac arrest during needlescopic cholecystectomy: Prospective study of 100 cases.
Hong Kong, Med J 2005;11(1);30-5.
anesthesia on the table and the other expired on the 1st 11. Prieto Diazchavez E, Median Chavez J, L Gonzalez Ojeda A, et
postoperative’s day in the ICU. Others have reported a morbidity al. Direct trocar insertion without pneumoperitoneum and the
of 2.9% with no mortality. 7 veress needle in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative
Three of our patients developed basal pneumonia and were study. Acta Chir Belg 2006;106(5).
treated with antibiotics and chest physiotherapy. Average 12. Frilling A, Li J, Weber F, Fruhaus NR, et al. Major bile duct
hospital stay was 2 days in our study while it has been reported injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a tertiary center
as 2.29 days including the prolonged stay in complicated cases experience. J Gastrointest Surg 2004;8(6):679-85.
4