Page 22 - WALS Journal
P. 22

Hysterosalpingography, Laparoscopy or Both in the Diagnosis of Tubal Disease in Infertility
                                                                                             16
               Of the 67 patients with normal HSG findings, 12 were found  misinterpretation as distal occlusions.  In our study we found
            to have adnexial adhesions, 3 were diagnosed with pelvic  6 false- positive cases.
            endometriosis and 3 patients had ovarian cysts. Of the twelve  Both HSG and laparoscopy have advantages and
            cases of bilaterally occluded tubes detected by HSG, only 3  disadvantages. HSG is quite accurate in defining the uterine
            (25%) were confirmed to have bilateral occlusion during  cavity. Laparoscopy on the other hand, although not able to
            laparoscopy.                                       give information on the uterine cavity, is superior to
                                                               histerosalpingography in the assessment of tubal patency and
            Discussion                                         allows detection and, most importantly, treatment of
                                                               intraabdominal pathologies as endometriosis and peritubal
            Histerosalpingography (HSG) is a frequently utilized diagnostic  adhesions. The disadvantages of histerosalpingography are
            method in the assessment of tubal status and detection of  the possibility of allergic reactions to iodine, pelvic infections,
            intrauterine anatomical defects in the infertility diagnostic  endometriosis secondary to carriage of endometrial tissue onto
            workup. However, the inadequacy of HSG in determining the  extrauterine sites, and tubal rupture due to contrast material
            state of tubal patency, emphasizes the need for laparoscopy.  given under pressure in patients with hydrosalphinges. Also
            Laparoscopy provides both a panoramic view of the pelvic  the ovaries are said to be exposed to 500-1000 mRads of radiation
            reproductive anatomy and a magnified view of pelvic organs  during HSG. The disadvantages of laparoscopy are its
            and peritoneal surfaces. It is generally accepted that, diagnostic  invasiveness, cost, and related risks of surgical complications. 17
            laparoscopy is the gold standard in diagnosing tubal pathology  During our HSGs, a water soluble contrast medium was used,
                                                8
            and other intraabdominal causes of infertility.  Compared with  and no complications were encountered. During laparoscopy,
            laparoscopy, HSG has only moderate sensitivity but relatively  the only complication encountered was hemorrhage from the
            high specificity. If an occlusion is detected in HSG, there is a  5 mm trocar insertion site that was managed by cauterization.
            60% possibility of the tubes to be actually patent, however,  A diagnosis of unexplained infertility is usually made only
            when patency is demonstrated in HSG, there is little chance the  after it has been demonstrated that the female partner ovulates
            tube to be actually occluded. 9,10  In our study, the likelihood  regularly, has patent fallopian tubes, shows no evidence of
            ratio of HSG for tube patency was found to be 3.21, and the  peritubal adhesions, fibroids or endometriosis and has a partner
            likelihood ratio for tubal occlusion was 0.26. Consequently,  with normal sperm production and function.  Fatum et al
                                                                                                     2
            similar to the studies mentioned previously, we concluded that  suggested that couples with unexplained infertility should be
            HSG is more accurate in detecting patent tubes rather than  treated by 3-6 cycles of combined gonadotrophins and IUI
            occluded ones. Both false negative and false positive results  without preceding diagnostic laparoscopy, and if unsuccessful,
            can be seen with HSG. In accordance with literature, the false-  they should be referred directly to IVF. In their opinion, this
            negative results were much more common than the false-  approach would prove to be the most cost effective and efficient
                                   11
            positive results in our study.  Injection of contrast material  treatment protocol.  In Drake et al’s series of 24 cases with
                                                                               7
            during HSG can lead to the misdiagnosis of tubal occlusion  unexplained infertility, 18 were found to have abnormal findings
                                 12
            following cornual spasm.  In HSG, while one tube can be  in laparoscopy. It was proposed that the usage of laparoscopy
            observed to be patent, the other one can be occluded. Whereas  as a standard test of tubal function would reduce the apparent
            this observation may indicate an actual one sided proximal tubal  incidence of unexplained infertility. They concluded that
            occlusion, most commonly it is due to the tendency of the  laparoscopy is an essential final step in an otherwise negative
            contrast material to enter the tube with the least resistance.  work-up for infertility.  Laparoscopy has been shown to reveal
                                                                                 18
            Therefore, the occluded appearing tube is in fact most likely to  abnormal findings in 21-68 % of infertile patients with a normal
                     13
            be normal.  Another scenario resulting in false-negative  hysterosalpingogram. 4,8,19  Hening et al have detected adnexial
            diagnosis of tubal occlusion is when inadequate wedging of  adhesions and pelvic endometriosis during surgery in 21% of
            the cervical cannula allows leakage of contrast material into the  patients with normal HSG findings.  The superiority of
                                                                                               20
            vagina, thus interfering with generation of sufficient  laparoscopy over HSG in assessing extratubuler pathology is
            intracavitary pressure and often leading to the misdiagnosis of  shown in our study as has been demonstrated in other studies. 6
                         14
            tubal occlusion.  In our study, we found 15 false negative  Tanahatoe et al stated that laparoscopy revealed abnormalities
            cases. Although often venous and lymphatic channels can be  that resulted in altered treatment decisions in 25% of the patients
            identified by their anatomy, contrast intravasation into uterine  who would normally have been scheduled for IUI if laparoscopy
            and ovarian veins can sometimes be mistaken for tubal filling. 15  had not been performed. The altered treatments mainly
            False- positive HSG results may be due to the contrast material  concerned surgery for minimal/mild endometriosis and
            entering through the dilated tube with hydrosalphinx. In the  periadnexial adhesions, both performed during diagnostic
                                                                          8
            presence of peritubal adhesions, even though the tubes may  laparoscopy.  In our study, 27 % of cases with normal HSGs
            actually be patent, focal contrast deposits can lead to the  were found to have adnexial adhesions, ovarian cysts and pelvic


                                                             25
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27