Page 29 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery

Kaundinya Kiran Bharatam

required fewer parenteral analgesics and had reduced rates 10. Watson RW, Redmond HP, McCarthy J, et al. Exposure of the
of postoperative wound infections. peritoneal cavity to air regulates early inflammatory responses
to surgery in a murine model. Br J Surg 1995;82:1060-85.
11. West MA, Hackam DJ, Baker J, et al. Mechanism of decreased
CONCLUSION in vitro murine macrophage cytokine release after exposure to
carbon dioxide: Relevance to laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg
Serious concerns about the potential inadequacy of
1997;226:179-90.
resection, possible staging inaccuracies, tumor cell 12. Cruickshank AM, Fraser WD, Burns HJ, et al. Response of
dissemination demanded prospective randomized serum interleukin-6 in patients undergoing elective surgery of
comparisons between the open and laparoscopic procedures varying severity. Clin Sci (Lond) 1990;79:161-65.
for colorectal malignancies. Multi-institutional studies provide 13. Schwenk W, Jacobi C, Mansmann U, et al. Inflammatory
response after laparoscopic and conventional colorectal re-
data in support of safety of laparoscopy with respect to
sections—results of a prospective randomized trial. Langenbecks
complications, time to recurrence, disease free survival, Arch Surg 2000;385:2-9.
overall survival, and quality of life. Operative factors like 14. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al: Short-term endpoints of
extent of resection–specifically nos of lymph nodes sampled, conventional versus laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients
with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): Multicentre,
length of bowel and mesentry resected and bowel margins–
randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005;365:1718-26.
did not vary in both the groups. Hence, it may be suggested 15. Wexner SD, Cohen SM: Port metastases after laparoscopic
that it is safe to proceed with laparoscopic colorectal cancer colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy. Br J Surg 1995;82:
surgery and that plans to conduct comprehensive analysis 295-98.
16. Tang CL, Eu KW, Tai BC, et al: Randomized clinical trial of the
of the quality of life, cost and cost-effectiveness of
effect of open versus laparoscopically assisted colectomy on
laparascopic surgery for colorectal malignancies may be systemic immunity inpatients with colorectal cancer. Br J Surg
undertaken. 24 2001;88:801-07.
17. Jayne DG, Brown JM, Thorpe H, et al. Bladder and sexual
REFERENCES function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized
clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique. Br J Surg
1. Curet MJ, Putrakul K, Pitcher DE, et al. Laparoscopically 2005;92:1124-32.
assisted colon resection for colon carcinoma: Perioperative results 18. Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al. Laparoscopic surgery
and long-term outcome. Surg Endosc 2000;14:1062-66. versus open surgery for colon cancer: Short-term outcomes of a
2. Joels CS, Mostafa G, Matthews BD, Kercher KW, et al. Factors randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2005;6:477-84.
affecting intravenous analgesic requirements after colectomy. 19. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of
J Am Coll Surg 2003;197:780-85. conventional versus laparoscopic-assistedsurgery in patients
3. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy- with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre,
assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non- randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2005;365:1718-26.
metastatic colon cancer: A randomised trial. Lancet 20. Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. The mesorectum in rectal
2002;359:2224-29. cancer surgery E the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg
4. Nelson H. Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: A trial 1982;69:613-16.
update. Swiss Surg 2001;7:248-51. 21. Feliciotti F, Guerrieri M, Paganini AM, et al. Long-term results
5. Harold K, Mostafa G, Matthews BD, et al. Importance of of laparoscopic versus open resectionsfor rectal cancer for 124
demographic variables in colorectal cancer. Southeastern Surgical unselected patients. Surg Endosc 2003;17:1530-35.
Congress, Savannah, Georgia, February 2003;9-11. 22. Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis PP, et al. Laparoscopic versus
6. Nelson H, Petrelli N, Carlin A, et al. Guidelines 2000 for colon open surgery for rectal cancer: A meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol
and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:583-96. 2006;13:413-24.
7. Neuhaus SJ, Texler M, Hewett PJ, Watson DI. Port-site metas- 23. Gao F, Cao YF, Chen LS. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes
tases following laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 1998;85:735-41. after laparoscopic resection for rectalcancer. Int J Colorectal Dis
8. Nduka CC, Monson JR, Menzies-Gow N, Darzi A. Abdominal 2006;21:652-56.
wall metastases following laparoscopy. Br J Surg 1994;81: 24. Nelson H, Weeks JC, Wieand HS. Proposed phase II trial
648-52. comparing laparoscopic-assisted colectomy versus open
9. Lee SW, Feingold DL, Carter JJ, et al. Peritoneal macrophage colectomy for colon cancer. In: Journal of the National Cancer
and blood monocyte functions after open and laparoscopic- Institute monographs. No. 19. Bethesda, Md.: National Cancer
assisted cecectomy in rats. Surg Endosc 2003;17:1996-2002. Institute, 1995:51-56 (NIH publication no. 9403839).

30
JAYPEE