Page 42 - WJOLS - Laparoscopic Journal
P. 42

Laparoscopic Ovarian Drilling versus Medical Treatment in Management of Clomiphene Citrate Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome

            Operative and Postoperative Complications          were found to be lower than the before LOD values by
                                                               means of ovarian reserve markers, the after values stayed

            The procedure is devoid of major complications, and yield  higher than normal when compared with normal women
            satisfactory ovulation and conception rates. However,  without PCOS. 17,18  Even though the fear for ovarian reserve
            adhesion formation is a potential complication following such  and premature ovarian failure is not unfounded with LOD,
            procedures. 4,5  Other potential complications include  hormone replacement therapy could be used if need be.
                                               3
            premature ovarian failure in the future.  The procedure  Some studies have tried to identify makers for positive
            usually done as a day case and patient need not be admitted.  response to LOD to include high levels of Luteinizing
            Postoperative pain is relieved with mild analgesics such as  hormones and androstendione, short period of infertility
            paracetamol for 2 to 3 days. Other potential risks is that of  (< 3 years) and absence of pre-existing tubal disease and
            anesthesia which is beyond the scope of this review.  advocate their use to identify patients who will respond
                                                               well to LOD. 19,20
            Safety and Cost-effectiveness
            The procedure does not add to more cost or risk from  Quality-of-life Analysis
            anesthesia for a patient having diagnostic laparoscopy for  LOD promotes a better quality-of-life when used in women
            evaluation of infertility. Successful pregnancy from  especially amongst those who have not conceived following
            treatment with LOD will of course treat the patients infertility  treatment. A study on women’s health-related quality-of-
            fulfilling the desire of the patient. LOD is more effective  life (HRQoL) on 168 CC-resistant women with PCOS that


            than or equivalent to metformin, GnRHa, or FSH in resolving  were randomly assigned to receive either laparoscopic

            anovulation and pregnancy. 3,9-11  Systematic review has  electrocauteryof the ovaries followed by CC or recombinant

            shown that there is no difference in ongoing pregnancy,  FSH (rFSH) if anovulation persisted. Overall, HRQoL was

            births and miscarriages between LOD and FSH but LOD  notaffected in both groups. In women still under treatment,

                                             12
            has reduced risk of multiple pregnancy.  FSH and to lower  rFSH was slightly more burdensome for women’s HRQoL

            extent CC have the added risk of causing ovarian   than electrocautery. 21
                                          4
            hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS),  which is a potentially  Future prospects of LOD:
            fatal condition. Futhermore, GnRHa is expensive and could  With increasing evidence that LOD is more effective
            cause distressing pseudomenopausal symptoms and which  with less cost, and as techniques to reduce periovarian
            may require add back hormone therapy for the treatment to  adhesions improves, more practitioners will begin to consider
                    4
            continue.  The cumulative cost of treatment with FSH over  it ahead of chemotherapeutic agents in treatment of CC-
            LOD was found to be higher in a randomized trials and one  resistant PCOS.
            systematic review. 13-15  This may be similar with other
            chemotherapeutic agents that have higher risks of multiple  CONCLUSION
            gestation. In a study, the median time to pregnancy after
            LOD was 135 days and LOD alone resolves infertility within  LOD has obvious comparative advantages to competitive
            4 to 6 months in 50 to 60% of couples. The researchers  chemotherapeutic agents. Reduction in overall cost of
            were advocating a strategy of diagnostic laparoscopy and  treatment and risk of multiple gestation implies that it may
            LOD as the first line of treatment of infertility in women  be the treatment of choice in women with CC-resistant
            with PCOS as this will shorten the time to pregnancy for  PCOS.
            many women, reduce the need for medical ovulation
            induction and enable diagnosis of those women with  REFERENCES
            anatomic infertility, who can achieve pregnancy only by in  1. The Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-sponsored PCOS Consensus
            vitro fertilization treatment. 16                       Work-shop Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic
               There is however, a risk of periovarian adhesions and  criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary
                                                                    syndrome. Fertil Steril 2004;81(1):19-25.
            premature ovarian failure in the future. Studies to determine  2. Balen AH, Laven JSE, Tan SL, Dewailly D. Ultrasound
            ovarian reserve and possibility of future premature ovarian  assessment of the polycystic ovary. IntConsensus Definitions.
            failure are few and equivocal. There were statistically  Human Reprod Update 2003;9:505-14.
            significant differences between Day 3 FSH, inhibin B levels,  3. Malkawi HY. Laparoscopic ovarian drilling in the treatment of
                                                                    polycystic ovary syndrome: How many punctures per ovary
            ovarian volume and antral follicle count before and after  are needed to improve the reproductive outcome? J Obstet
            LOD in some of the reports. Although, the after LOD values  Gynaecol Res 2005;31(2):115-19.

            World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, May-August 2010;3(2):99-102                               101
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47