Page 36 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 36

Ultrasonic Dissection vs Conventional Method
            Table 1: Demography of the patients in the clipless laparoscopic   Table 2: Intraoperative findings
            cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic groups  Variables       CLC group (n 53) CL group (n 59)  p value
                              CLC group (n 53)  CL group (n 59)   Operative time (mean)  35.91 ± 11.66  41.12 ± 14.23  0.054
            Variables         (%)          (%)         p value  Gallbladder       7 (13.20%)  12 (20.33%)  0.31
            Age (mean)                                          perforation (mean)
              <30             13 (24.52)   13 (22.03)  0.54     GB removal time   6 (5–8)     6 (5–10)    0.23
              31–40           10 (18.86)     6 (10.16)          (median)
              41–50           12 (22.64)   12 (20.33)           Drain placement   6 (11.32%)  13 (22.03%)  0.13
              51–60             8 (15.09)  12 (20.33)           Conversion        1 (1.85%)   2 (3.2%)    0.63
              61–70           10 (18.86)   16 (27.11)
            Sex                                                Table 3: Operative time in clipless laparoscopic cholecystectomy
              Male            10 (18.86)     8 (13.55)  0.44   and conventional laparoscopic groups with and without gallbladder
              Female          43 (81.13)   51 (86.44)          perforation
            Previous surgery    6 (11.32)  10 (16.94)  0.39     Operative time    CLC group   CL group     p value
            Comorbid condition  14 (26.41)  18 (30.50)  0.63    With GB perforation   46.42 ± 12.85  50.58 ± 14.44  0.34
            Diabetes mellitus    7 (13.2)    5 (8.47)  0.41     (mean)
            Hypertension        5 (9.43)   10 (16.94)  0.24     Without GB perforation  34.30 ± 9.30  38.70 ± 10.76  0.03
                                                                (mean)
            Cirrhosis           0            2 (3.38)  0.17
            COPD                2 (3.77)     1 (1.69)  0.91    oozing or bile stain and when some collection was anticipated
            USG findings                                       in the postoperative period. The drains were usually removed on
              Multiple calculi  41 (77.35)  51 (86.44)  0.21   second postoperative day (range 1–14 days) and the total days
              Solitary stone  12 (22.64)     8 (13.55)  0.62   required to remove the drain was not significant (p 0.65) between
              Acute cholecystitis    4 (7.54)    6 (10.16)     the groups (Table 2). Three (2.6%) patients required conversion
                                                               to open cholecystectomy in our study, i.e., One (1.85%) in the
                                                               CLC group and two (3.2%) in the CL group. The one in the CLC
            cholecystitis and the rest [102 (91.07%)] were electively operated   group had obscured anatomy with frozen Calot’s triangle and an
            for gallstone disease. Four (7.54%) patients in the CLC group   enlarged cystic node. The reason for conversion in the CL group
            and 6 (10.16%) in the CL group were operated for acute calculus   was intraoperative bleeding not controllable laparoscopically and
            cholecystitis. The demographics of the patients in both the groups   the other one had a dilated CBD with multiple calculi requiring a
            were comparable (Table 1).                         choledochoduodenostomy.
               The mean operative time was 38.65 ± 13.28 minutes (range   All the patients (100%) in the study group required an analgesic
            20–85 minutes). The operative time in the CLC group (35.91 ±   in the first 12 hours and majority 109 (97.32%) asked for analgesia in
            11.66 minutes) was less when compared to the CL group (41.12 ±   the first 24 hours. Fifty-one (96.22%) patients in CLC and 58 (98.3%)
            14.23 minutes), though it was not statistically significant (p 0.054).   in CL group asked for analgesia in the first 24 hours (0.49). The VAS
            A total of 19 (17%) patients had perforation of GB intraoperatively.   for pain in the first 12 hours postoperatively was significantly (p <
            The operative time was significantly less in those without GB   0.05) less statistically in the CLC group (Table 4). The VAS for pain
            perforation (n 93, mean 36.52 ± 13.28 minutes) than in those with   at 24 hours postoperatively was also less in the CLC group (2.5 ±
            GB perforation (n 19, mean 49.05 ± 13.51 minutes) (p < 0.001). Seven   0.8 vs 2.97 ± 0.87) though it was not statistically significant (p 0.50);
            (13.2%) patients in the CLC group and 12 (20.33%) in the CL group   and after the first week, it was comparable in both the groups (CLC
            had intraoperative GB perforation (p 0.31). The median time taken   1.16 ± 0.47 vs 1.10 ± 0.30; p 0.55).
            to remove the GB from its fossa in the CLC group was 6 minutes   The amount of blood loss as demonstrated by the median
            (IQR of 5–8 minutes), ranging from 3 minutes to 30 minutes; and   fall in hemoglobin level was significantly (p 0.001) less in the CLC
            in the CL group, it was 6 minutes (IQR of 5–10 minutes), ranging   group (Table 4). Majority of the cases [88 (78.57%)] were discharged
            from 3 minutes to 26 minutes (Table 2). The time taken to remove   on the first postoperative day following surgery and in both the
            GB from the fossa was not statistically significant between the two   groups, patients were discharged on the same postoperative days
            groups (p 0.23).                                   (p 0.23). In our study group, a total of seven (6.25%) patients had
               The operative time when compared between patients “who   morbidity following surgery: two (3.77%) in the CLC group and
            had GB perforation” in the two groups, the CL group took more   five (8.47%) in the CL group (p 0.44). In the CLC group, we had one
            time but was not statistically significant (50.58 ± 14.44 minutes vs   case (1.88%) each with port site infection and bilious drainage. In
            46.42 ± 12.85 minutes in CLC group; p 0.34). However, when the “GB   the CL group, two cases (3.38%) each with port site infections and
            was not perforated,” the operative time was 34.30 ± 9.30 minutes   bilious drainage followed by one (1.69%) with chest infection. There
            (range 25–80 minutes) in the CLC group and 38.70 ± 10.76 minutes   were three (2.67%) cases of port site infection. All of them required
            (range 20–65 minutes) in the CL group. The operative time was   removal of suture and were managed with daily dressings. One
            statistically significantly less in the CLC group (p 0.03) when the GB   in the CL group had deep surgical site infection in the epigastric
            was not perforated (Table 3).                      port, which was managed with wound trimming and irrigation
               In all 19 (17%) patients required placement of the drain, 6   under local anesthesia, allowed to heal by secondary intention,
            (11.32%) in the CLC group and 13 (22.03%) patients in the CL group   and discharged on the fourth postoperative day. All the patients
            (p 0.13). It was kept mainly after difficult dissection which had   were without any adverse consequences in the follow-up and the


            122   World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, Volume 12 Issue 3 (September–December 2019)
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41