Page 34 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 34

RESEARCH ARTICLE
            Clipless Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Ultrasonic Dissection

            vs Conventional Method


                                      2
                       1
            Laligen Awale , Narendra Pandit , Shailesh Adhikary 3
             AbstrAct
             Introduction: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is now the gold standard treatment of gallstone disease, but with advancement in technology,
             there is always a scope for improvement. Ultrasonic shears has been shown to seal the duct and small-size vessel adequately but the fear
             of complication and sleepless nights has always hindered its use as the sole instrument for LC. Proper use of ultrasonic shears can provide
             improvement or refinement in LC.
             Materials and methods: It is a randomized controlled trial conducted at BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal, from 2015 to
             2016 (1 year). All the patients with symptomatic gallstone disease were assessed thoroughly and randomized into the harmonic scalpel [clipless
             laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC)] or conventional laparoscopic group (CL).
             Results: Over a period of 1 year, 112 patients were enrolled into CLC (53) and CL (59) groups. The demography of the patients in both the
             groups including age, sex, history of previous surgery, comorbid conditions, and history of acute cholecystitis was comparable. The mean
             operative time in our study was 38.65 ± 13.28 minutes. The operative time in the CLC group (35.91 ± 11.66 minutes vs 41.12 ± 14.23 minutes)
             was less though it was not statistically significant (p 0.054). However, when the “gallbladder (GB) was not perforated,” the operative time was
             significantly less in the CLC group (34.30 ± 9.30 minutes vs 38.70 ± 10.76 minutes, p 0.03). In our study, three (2.6%) patients required conversion
             to open cholecystectomy. One (1.85%) in CLC and 2 (3.2%) in the CL group (p 0.63). The visual analog score (VAS) for pain in the first 12 hours
             and median fall in hemoglobin was significantly less in the CLC group. In our study group, a total of seven (6.25%) patients had morbidity and
             there was no mortality.
             Conclusion: With the development of ultrasonic energy source and its ability to seal the vessel and cystic duct safely, it can be utilized during
             LC without the need of clips.
             Keywords: Harmonic scapel, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Symptomatic cholelithiasis.
             World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery (2020): 10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1384


            IntroductIon                                       1–3 Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, BP

            Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is now the gold standard   Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Sunsari, Nepal
                                     1
            treatment of gallstone disease;  and no doubt, presently it is   Corresponding Author: Laligen Awale, Department of Surgery,
            one of the most commonly performed laparoscopic procedures   Division  of  Gastrointestinal  Surgery,  BP  Koirala  Institute  of  Health
            worldwide. The advantages of this minimal invasive approach   Sciences, Sunsari, Nepal, Phone: +977 9841227258, e-mail: lalijan@
            have been widely reported, showing the positive impact on the   hotmail.com
            short- and long-term outcomes. With the rapid advancement in   How  to  cite  this  article: Awale L, Pandit N, Adhikary S. Clipless
            the technology, there is always new scope for improvement in the   Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Ultrasonic Dissection vs Conventional
            procedure.                                         Method. World J Lap Surg 2019;12(3):120–125.

               Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is an arguably safe procedure,   Source of support: Nil
            but there are few issues with the current technology and   Conflict of interest: None
            technique, which have been seen to increase the risk of injuries and
                                  2
            postoperative complications.  Standard LC is usually performed   Ultrasonic shears adequately seal the vessel and duct, so avoid the
            by instruments such as Maryland dissector, scissors, hook, and/  need of metallic clips. Minimum bleeding while dissection with this
            or spatula. Cystic artery and duct is most frequently occluded by   technique keeps the surgical field clear, avoiding misidentification
            simple metallic clips. Common problems include common bile duct   of the structures. Substantial number of studies reports the positive
                                                         3
            (CBD) stone formation due to the migration of suture materials,  bile   or favorable outcome in closure of cystic artery and duct using
                                                           4,5
            leak due to the inappropriate clip placement or slippage of clips,    the ultrasonically activated shears, 2,9–12  with acceptable rate of
            lateral injury to bile duct and/or vessels from heat of monopolar   complications. In these studies, cases of bile leak associated with this
                  6
            cautery,  and possibility of visceral organ injury due to the need for   technique were reported but comparable (2–4%) to the standard
            frequent instrumental exchange. 6–8                technique.
               Ultrasound shear is the vessel and duct sealing device which   Ultrasound shear has been shown to have added benefit over
                                                           6,9
            tackles the issue related to clips, suture, and lateral thermal injury.    the conventional technique but the fear and hesitancy still exist
            It can also be used as dissector, hence decreases not only the   regarding its widespread acceptance as a sole instrument for LC.
            frequency of instrumental exchange and associated possibility   Hesitancy and fear of using it as a sole instrument for “cystic duct
            of visceral injury but also the operative time loss during the   closure” seem to be the core issue, in spite of the adequate evidence
            process. It provides the surgeon with newer armamentarium in LC.   to suggest its effective closure. In our institute, approximately 500

            © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.
            org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to
            the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain
            Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39