Page 38 - Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 38
JA Maseloane
decision whether to proceed with primary anastomosis versus 6. Bartlett JG, Condon RE, Gorbach SL, et al. Veterans
fecal diversion may be taken out of the hands of the administration cooperative study on bowel preparation for
gynecologist. Despite recommendations and data supporting elective colorectal operations: Impact of oral antibiotic regimen
on colonic flora, wound irrigation cultures, and bacteriology of
the safety of primary anastomosis on unprepared bowel, clinical septic complications. Ann Surg 1978;188:249-54.
practice patterns among surgeons vary greatly. In situations 7. Espin-Basany E, Sanchez-Garcia JL, Lopez-Cano M, et al.
where the patient is thought to be at high-risk for inadvertent Prospective, randomised study on antibiotic prophylaxis in
bowel injury, it may be prudent to perform a mechanical bowel colorectal surgery. Is it really necessary to use oral antibiotics?
Int J Colorectal Dis 2005;20:542-46.
preparation to avoid the possibility of fecal diversion, depending 8. Guenaga KK, Matos D, Wille-Jørgensen P. Mechanical bowel
on the pervasive local practice patterns of consulting surgeons. preparation for elective colorectal surgery.Cochrane Database
It may also be a good idea to have a discussion with the local Syst Rev 2009;1 CD001544.
team of surgeons to discuss what influence, if any, the lack of a 9. Halsted WS. Circular suture of the intestine: An experimental
study. Am J Med Sci 1887;94:436-61.
mechanical bowel preparation might have on their surgical 10. Bucher P, Gervaz P, Soravia C, et al. Randomized clinical trial of
management of an inadvertent bowel injury. mechanical bowel preparation versus no preparation before
A novel role for bowel preparation in pelvic laparoscopic elective left-sided colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 2005;92:409-14.
surgery is the evacuation of intestinal contents to allow for a 11. Hughes ES. Asepsis in large-bowel surgery. Ann R Coll Surg
Engl 1972;51:347-56.
clearer operative field. Based on a single, randomized, controlled 12. Dorudi S, Wilson NM, Heddle RM. Primary restorative
trial, there does not appear to be any advantage of mechanical colectomy in malignant left-sided large bowel obstruction. Ann
bowel preparation on surgeon perception of appropriateness R Coll Surg Engl 1990;72:393-95.
19
of surgical field. As the field of minimally invasive gynecologic 13. Poole GV. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis during bowel
preparation: An example of clinical translocation. South Med J
surgery continues to evolve and encompass more complex 1991;84:1412-13.
surgical techniques, further research is needed to better define 14. Kale TI, Kuzu MA, Tekeli A, et al. Aggressive bowel preparation
optimal pre and intraoperative management. As suggested by does not enhance bacterial translocation, provided the mucosal
the Cochrane review, well-designed randomized studies barrier is not disrupted: A prospective, randomized study. Dis
Colon Rectum 1998;41:636-41.
regarding mechanical bowel preparation in laparoscopy are 15. Bucher P, Gervaz P, Egger JF, et al. Morphologic alterations
needed, regarding both oncologic and benign gynecologic associated with mechanical bowel preparation before elective
indications. colorectal surgery: A randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum
2006;49:109-12.
REFERENCES 16. Mahajna A, Krausz M, Rosin D, et al. Bowel preparation is
associated with spillage of bowel contents in colorectal surgery.
1. Botha MH. Mechanical bowel preparation in gynaecological Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:1626-31.
surgery—are we doing more harm than good? S Afr Med J 17. Lassen K, Hannemann P, Ljungqvist O, et al. Patterns in current
2007;97:1040, 1042-43. preoperative practice: Survey of colorectal surgeons in five
2. Leo WA, Von Riesen VL, Roberts GG, Schloerb PR. Twenty- Northern European countries. BMJ 2005;330:1420-21.
four hours preparation of the large bowel for surgery using 18. van der Voort M, Heijnsdijk EA, Gouma DJ. Bowel injury as a
neomycin-sulfathalidine or neomycin-oxytetracycline: A complication of laparoscopy. Br J Surg 2004;91:1253-58.
comparative evaluation. Ann Surg 1958;147:359-65. 19. Muzii L, Bellati F, Zullo MA, et al. Mechanical bowel
3. Itani KM, Wilson SE, Awad SS, et al. Polyethylene glycol preparation before gynecologic laparoscopy: A randomized,
versus sodium phosphate mechanical bowel preparation in single-blind, controlled trial. Fertil Steril 2006;85:689-93.
elective colorectal surgery. Am J Surg 2007;193:190-94. 20. Lijoi D, Ferrero S, Mistrangelo E, et al. Bowel preparation before
4. Chaleoykitti B. Comparative study between polyethylene glycol laparoscopic gynaecological surgery in benign conditions using a
and sodium phosphate solution in elective colorectal surgery. 1 week low-fibre diet: A surgeon blind, randomized and controlled
J Med Assoc Thai 2002;85:92-96. trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009;280:713-18.
5. Baum ML, Anish DS, Chalmers TC, et al. A survey of clinical 21. Gadducci A, Cosio S, Genazzani AR. The perioperative
trials of antibiotic prophylaxis in colon surgery: Evidence against management of patients with gynaecological cancer undergoing
further use of no-treatment controls. N Engl J Med 1981;305: major surgery: A debated clinical challenge. Crit Rev Oncol
795-99. Hematol 2010;73:126-40.
168
JAYPEE