Page 35 - Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 35
WJOLS
Role of Minimal Access Surgery in Management of Infective Pancreatic Necrosis
approaches that have risen to favor are the endoscopic ACKNOWLEDGMENT
transgastric and nephroscopic retroperitoneal routes, probably The guidance provided by Professor Dr RK Mishra, Director,
because they are based on conventional operations. Laparoscopy Hospital, Tilak Nagar, Delhi, is sincerely
The former is an adaptation of an open surgical approach, appreciated and acknowledged.
developed to treat retrogastric pseudocysts, that has been
extended to include endoluminal ultrasonographically-guided REFERENCES
transgastric puncture of the lesion, balloon dilatation of the 1. Slavin J, Ghaneh P, Sutton R, et al. Management of necrotizing
track, insertion of multiple stents, direct basket extraction of pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol 2001;7:476-81.
necrosum and transpapillary stenting of the pancreatic duct. 2. Rau B, Steinbach G, Gansauge F, et al. The potential role of
These technically demanding endoscopic maneuvers are likely procalcitonin and interleukin 8 in the prediction of infected
to become more widespread and supercede the laparoscopic necrosis in acute pancreatitis. Gut 1997;41:832-40.
transgastric operation. 3. Traverso LW, Kozarek RA. Pancreatic necrosectomy: Definitions
and technique. J Gastrointest Surg 2005;9:436-39.
The endoscopic transgastric procedure avoids peritoneal 4. Mayer JM, Raraty M, Slavin J, et al. Serum amyloid A is a
contamination and external pancreatic fistula formation, but it better early predictor of severity than C-reactive protein in acute
may not be possible if there is no abutment of the lesion against pancreatitis. Br J Surg 2002;89:163-71.
the stomach or duodenal wall. The nephroscopic retroperitoneal 5. Götzinger P, Wamser P, Barlan M, et al. Candida infection of
local necrosis in severe acute pancreatitis is associated with
procedure has been advocated by the Glasgow group and increased mortality. Shock 2000;14:320-23.
appears now to be the most popular MAN approach. It is an 6. Freeny PC, Hauptmann E, Althaus SJ, Traverso LW, Sinanan
adaptation of the open lumbotomy technique to left sided M. Percutaneous CT-guided catheter drainage of infected acute
organized pancreatic necrosis. necrotizing pancreatitis: Techniques and results. Am J
Roentgenol 1998;170:969-75.
MAN has now passsed the stage of feasibility testing and 7. Bradley EL, Allen K. A prospective longitudinal study of
it can be done. What is now needed is evidence to guide the observation versus surgical intervention in the management of
decision about which technique should be selected for which necrotizing pancreatitis. Am J Surg 1991;161:19-24.
patient and about the timing of its application. 8. Altemeier WA, Alexander JW. Pancreatic abscess. A study of
32 cases. Arch Surg 1963;87:80-89.
It appears to be associated with a reduction in duration of 9. Beger HG, Büchler M, Bittner R, et al. Necrosectomy and
stay in the intensive care unit. Another challenge to progress is postoperative local lavage in necrotizing pancreatitis. Br J Surg
technical and involves the extraction of necrosum. With MAN, 1988;75:207-12.
the ‘educated finger’ cannot be deployed for digital debridement. 10. Bradley EL. Management of infected pancreatic necrosis by
open drainage. Ann Surg 1987;206:542-50.
The small forceps and baskets currently in use mean tedious, 11. Fagniez PL, Rotman N, Kracht M. Direct retroperitoneal
piecemeal extraction. approach to necrosis in severe acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg
Now, with the advent of robotic surgery even within few 1989;76:264-67.
years it will be possible to perform the IPN surgery with maximum 12. Villazón A, Villazón O, Terrazas F, Raña R. Retroperitoneal
accuracy. However, a prospective double-blind study is drainage in the management of the septic phase of severe acute
pancreatitis. World J Surg 1991;15:103-07.
required for the same over a span of at least 5 years with 13. Castellanos G, Piñero A, Serrano A, et al. Translumbar
meticulous follow-up and data recording. retroperitoneal endoscopy: An alternative in the follow-up and
management of drained infected pancreatic necrosis. Arch Surg
CONCLUSION 2005;140:952-55.
14. Wilson PG, Manji M, Neoptolemos JP. Acute pancreatitis as a
Pancreatic necrosectomy by minimal access surgery is model of sepsis. J Antimicrob Chemother 1998;41:51-63.
feasible and on the available evidence there is no doubt that 15. Carter CR, McKay CJ, Imrie CW. Percutaneous necrosectomy
it has a major role to play in reducing both systemic insult and sinus tract endoscopy in the management of infected
and the subsequent mortality, but it demands technical pancreatic necrosis: An initial experience. Ann Surg 2000;232:
175-80.
expertise and availability of skilled interventionist. It requires 16. Connor S, Ghaneh P, Raraty M, et al. Minimally invasive retro-
multiple sessions as it is difficult to remove necrosum in a peritoneal pancreatic necrosectomy. Dig Surg 2003;20:270-77.
single sitting. 17. Risse O, Auguste T, Delannoy P, et al. Percutaneous video-
Currently, majority of patients are suitable for minimal access assisted necrosectomy for infected pancreatic necrosis.
Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2004;28:868-71.
surgery and with the development of better instruments and 18. Binmoeller KF (May 19, 2008). Pancreas-endoscopic
increasing experience this number is likely to increase, although transgastric pancreatic necrosectomy using a forward viewing
it is unlikely to completely replace open necrosectomy. echoendoscope. The DAVE Project.
World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, September-December 2011;4(3):160-165 165