Page 31 - Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 31

WJOLS


                                                   Role of Minimal Access Surgery in Management of Infective Pancreatic Necrosis


          been documented. The spectrum of bacteria cultured from  infection with a secondary deterioration, often during the third
          infected necrosis has altered with the more widespread use of  and fourth weeks of admission. This is often heralded by a
          prophylactic antibiotics, with a shift toward Gram-positive  significant rise in CRP.
          bacteria and fungal infections. 5                      A CT scan often will confirm the presence of a tense
             The necrotizing process can extend widely to involve  collection with rim enhancement arising from a region of
          retroperitoneal fat, small and large bowel mesentery and the  pancreatic necrosis. The presence of gas within the tissues
          retrocolic and perinephric compartments.            confirms infection, with an ‘air bubble’ appearance, but this is
                                                              present in the minority of cases. Infected necrosis usually is
          DIAGNOSING OF IPN                                   confirmed by fine-needle aspiration (FNA) for Gram’s stain and

          The clinical symptoms and signs of pancreatic necrosis are  bacterial culture. This can be guided by US or CT scan and is
          indistinguishable from those of other patients presenting with  considered safe and reliable.
          acute pancreatitis. Abdominal pain, distension and guarding
          are associated with a low-grade fever and tachycardia. The  MANAGEMENT OF IPN
          severity of pain and the extent of hyperamylasemia do not  The goals of surgical management are to remove necrotic and
          correspond with the severity of acute pancreatitis. Patients  infected tissue, drain pus, lavage the peritoneal cavity and avoid
          presenting late with severe disease often will have established  blood loss and injury to other organs. Few advocate only
          multiorgan dysfunction.                             observational nonoperative intensive approach to manage IPN. 7
             The classic skin signs of retroperitoneal necrosis are  Preservation of vital intact pancreatic tissue is important. The
          discoloration at umbilicus (Cullen’s sign), the flanks (Grey-  choice of operation is determined by the location, extent and
          Turner’s sign) and the inguinal region (Fox’s sign), are rare and  maturity of the necrotic material; status of the infection; the
          often not seen until the second or third week. The diagnosis of  patient’s condition, the degree of organ dysfunction and the
          pancreatic necrosis requires more than clinical acumen.  preference and experience of the surgeon.
             The gold standard for the diagnosis of pancreatic necrosis  A number of different approaches have been described some
          is contrast-enhanced CT scanning demonstrating hypo-  of which are only of historical interest. Necrosectomy is complex,
          perfusion in the arterial phase. In the absence of a specific  fraught with potentially life-threatening complications and
          marker of pancreatic necrosis, many serum predictors have been  should be left to the experienced surgeon. None of these surgical
          proposed C-reactive protein (CRP) as the most widely used  methods have been subjected to a randomized, controlled trial,

          predictor of pancreatic necrosis and is useful as a daily monitor  and the minimal access approaches are still evolving.The latter
          of disease progress. The accuracy in detecting necrosis is about  are best suited to treatment of well-demarcated and localized
          85%, but it requires 3 to 4 days to reach this level. The threshold  necrosis in the later stage of the disease.
          values depend on the assay and the study used. The most  One possible benefit of this approach is a reduction in the

          commonly used threshold is greater than 120 mg/l.   number of patients who need intensive-care support. The
               Other prognostic markers, none of which has been  minimal access surgical approaches to pancreatic necrosectomy
          proven to outperform CRP, include interleukin-6 (threshold  can be classified according to the type of optical system (flexible
          > 14 pg/ml) which peaks a day earlier than polymorphonuclear  endoscope, laparoscope or operating nephroscope) and the
          elastase (threshold > 120 gm/l), which peaks early and reflects  route used (via the stomach, peritoneum or retroperitoneum).
          neutrophil activation and degranulation; and phospholipase
          A  type II (threshold > 15 units/l). Urinary trypsinogen-  Open and Minimal Access Approaches to the
            2
          activating peptide and serum amyloid-A have also been studied  Treatment of Pancreatic Necrosis
          as early marker for severity prediction. 4          As per review of literature,
             In practice, the indications for a CT scan to diagnose and  •  Open approaches:
          determine the extent of pancreatic necrosis are the prediction of  –  Pancreatic resection
          severe pancreatitis (usually during the second week), when a  –  Necrosectomy + wide tube drainage 8
          patient fails to improve with initial resuscitation and/or when  –  Necrosectomy + staged laparotomy (reexploration)
          the CRP has crossed the diagnostic threshold (see above). The  –  Necrosectomy + drainage + relaparotomy
          CT scan can be used to grade the severity of acute pancreatitis  –  Necrosectomy + laparotomy + open packing 10
          [CT Severity Index (CTSI)] based on the extent of extrapancreatic  –  Necrosectomy + drainage + closed continuous lavage 9
          changes and pancreatic necrosis.                       –  Retroperitoneal routed necrosectomy 11,12
             The importance of the diagnosis of pancreatic necrosis is  •  Minimal access approaches:
          to initiate intensive-care management, which may necessitate  –  Laparoscopic necrosectomy
          transfer of the patient to a tertiary unit. The diagnosis of infected  –  Laparoscopic intracavitary necrosectomy
          necrosis is imperative because it is an absolute indication for  –  Laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous drainage
          surgical intervention. It is more usual to suspect pancreatic  –  Laparoscopic transgastric necrosectomy

          World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, September-December 2011;4(3):160-165                       161
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36